Cargando…

A structural-chemical explanation of fungal laccase activity

Fungal laccases (EC 1.10.3.2) are multi-copper oxidases that oxidize a wide variety of substrates. Despite extensive studies, the molecular basis for their diverse activity is unclear. Notably, there is no current way to rationally predict the activity of a laccase toward a given substrate. Such kno...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mehra, Rukmankesh, Muschiol, Jan, Meyer, Anne S., Kepp, Kasper P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35633-8
_version_ 1783373163689672704
author Mehra, Rukmankesh
Muschiol, Jan
Meyer, Anne S.
Kepp, Kasper P.
author_facet Mehra, Rukmankesh
Muschiol, Jan
Meyer, Anne S.
Kepp, Kasper P.
author_sort Mehra, Rukmankesh
collection PubMed
description Fungal laccases (EC 1.10.3.2) are multi-copper oxidases that oxidize a wide variety of substrates. Despite extensive studies, the molecular basis for their diverse activity is unclear. Notably, there is no current way to rationally predict the activity of a laccase toward a given substrate. Such knowledge would greatly facilitate the rational design of new laccases for technological purposes. We report a study of three datasets of experimental K(m) values and activities for Trametes versicolor and Cerrena unicolor laccase, using a range of protein modeling techniques. We identify diverse binding modes of the various substrates and confirm an important role of Asp-206 and His-458 (T. versicolor laccase numbering) in guiding substrate recognition. Importantly, we demonstrate that experimental K(m) values correlate with binding affinities computed by MMGBSA. This confirms the common assumption that the protein-substrate affinity is a major contributor to observed K(m). From quantitative structure-activity relations (QSAR) we identify physicochemical properties that correlate with observed K(m) and activities. In particular, the ionization potential, shape, and binding affinity of the substrate largely determine the enzyme’s K(m) for the particular substrate. Our results suggest that K(m) is not just a binding constant but also contains features of the enzymatic activity. In addition, we identify QSAR models with only a few descriptors showing that phenolic substrates employ optimal hydrophobic packing to reach the T1 site, but then require additional electronic properties to engage in the subsequent electron transfer. Our results advance our ability to model laccase activity and lend promise to future rational optimization of laccases toward phenolic substrates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6251875
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62518752018-11-29 A structural-chemical explanation of fungal laccase activity Mehra, Rukmankesh Muschiol, Jan Meyer, Anne S. Kepp, Kasper P. Sci Rep Article Fungal laccases (EC 1.10.3.2) are multi-copper oxidases that oxidize a wide variety of substrates. Despite extensive studies, the molecular basis for their diverse activity is unclear. Notably, there is no current way to rationally predict the activity of a laccase toward a given substrate. Such knowledge would greatly facilitate the rational design of new laccases for technological purposes. We report a study of three datasets of experimental K(m) values and activities for Trametes versicolor and Cerrena unicolor laccase, using a range of protein modeling techniques. We identify diverse binding modes of the various substrates and confirm an important role of Asp-206 and His-458 (T. versicolor laccase numbering) in guiding substrate recognition. Importantly, we demonstrate that experimental K(m) values correlate with binding affinities computed by MMGBSA. This confirms the common assumption that the protein-substrate affinity is a major contributor to observed K(m). From quantitative structure-activity relations (QSAR) we identify physicochemical properties that correlate with observed K(m) and activities. In particular, the ionization potential, shape, and binding affinity of the substrate largely determine the enzyme’s K(m) for the particular substrate. Our results suggest that K(m) is not just a binding constant but also contains features of the enzymatic activity. In addition, we identify QSAR models with only a few descriptors showing that phenolic substrates employ optimal hydrophobic packing to reach the T1 site, but then require additional electronic properties to engage in the subsequent electron transfer. Our results advance our ability to model laccase activity and lend promise to future rational optimization of laccases toward phenolic substrates. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6251875/ /pubmed/30470810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35633-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Mehra, Rukmankesh
Muschiol, Jan
Meyer, Anne S.
Kepp, Kasper P.
A structural-chemical explanation of fungal laccase activity
title A structural-chemical explanation of fungal laccase activity
title_full A structural-chemical explanation of fungal laccase activity
title_fullStr A structural-chemical explanation of fungal laccase activity
title_full_unstemmed A structural-chemical explanation of fungal laccase activity
title_short A structural-chemical explanation of fungal laccase activity
title_sort structural-chemical explanation of fungal laccase activity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251875/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35633-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mehrarukmankesh astructuralchemicalexplanationoffungallaccaseactivity
AT muschioljan astructuralchemicalexplanationoffungallaccaseactivity
AT meyerannes astructuralchemicalexplanationoffungallaccaseactivity
AT keppkasperp astructuralchemicalexplanationoffungallaccaseactivity
AT mehrarukmankesh structuralchemicalexplanationoffungallaccaseactivity
AT muschioljan structuralchemicalexplanationoffungallaccaseactivity
AT meyerannes structuralchemicalexplanationoffungallaccaseactivity
AT keppkasperp structuralchemicalexplanationoffungallaccaseactivity