Cargando…

Classification of the glioma grading using radiomics analysis

BACKGROUND: Grading of gliomas is critical information related to prognosis and survival. We aimed to apply a radiomics approach using various machine learning classifiers to determine the glioma grading. METHODS: We considered 285 (high grade n = 210, low grade n = 75) cases obtained from the Brain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Hwan-ho, Lee, Seung-hak, Kim, Jonghoon, Park, Hyunjin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30498643
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5982
_version_ 1783373226651418624
author Cho, Hwan-ho
Lee, Seung-hak
Kim, Jonghoon
Park, Hyunjin
author_facet Cho, Hwan-ho
Lee, Seung-hak
Kim, Jonghoon
Park, Hyunjin
author_sort Cho, Hwan-ho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Grading of gliomas is critical information related to prognosis and survival. We aimed to apply a radiomics approach using various machine learning classifiers to determine the glioma grading. METHODS: We considered 285 (high grade n = 210, low grade n = 75) cases obtained from the Brain Tumor Segmentation 2017 Challenge. Manual annotations of enhancing tumors, non-enhancing tumors, necrosis, and edema were provided by the database. Each case was multi-modal with T1-weighted, T1-contrast enhanced, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. A five-fold cross validation was adopted to separate the training and test data. A total of 468 radiomics features were calculated for three types of regions of interest. The minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm was used to select features useful for classifying glioma grades in the training cohort. The selected features were used to build three classifier models of logistics, support vector machines, and random forest classifiers. The classification performance of the models was measured in the training cohort using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. The trained classifier models were applied to the test cohort. RESULTS: Five significant features were selected for the machine learning classifiers and the three classifiers showed an average AUC of 0.9400 for training cohorts and 0.9030 (logistic regression 0.9010, support vector machine 0.8866, and random forest 0.9213) for test cohorts. DISCUSSION: Glioma grading could be accurately determined using machine learning and feature selection techniques in conjunction with a radiomics approach. The results of our study might contribute to high-throughput computer aided diagnosis system for gliomas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62522432018-11-29 Classification of the glioma grading using radiomics analysis Cho, Hwan-ho Lee, Seung-hak Kim, Jonghoon Park, Hyunjin PeerJ Radiology and Medical Imaging BACKGROUND: Grading of gliomas is critical information related to prognosis and survival. We aimed to apply a radiomics approach using various machine learning classifiers to determine the glioma grading. METHODS: We considered 285 (high grade n = 210, low grade n = 75) cases obtained from the Brain Tumor Segmentation 2017 Challenge. Manual annotations of enhancing tumors, non-enhancing tumors, necrosis, and edema were provided by the database. Each case was multi-modal with T1-weighted, T1-contrast enhanced, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. A five-fold cross validation was adopted to separate the training and test data. A total of 468 radiomics features were calculated for three types of regions of interest. The minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm was used to select features useful for classifying glioma grades in the training cohort. The selected features were used to build three classifier models of logistics, support vector machines, and random forest classifiers. The classification performance of the models was measured in the training cohort using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve. The trained classifier models were applied to the test cohort. RESULTS: Five significant features were selected for the machine learning classifiers and the three classifiers showed an average AUC of 0.9400 for training cohorts and 0.9030 (logistic regression 0.9010, support vector machine 0.8866, and random forest 0.9213) for test cohorts. DISCUSSION: Glioma grading could be accurately determined using machine learning and feature selection techniques in conjunction with a radiomics approach. The results of our study might contribute to high-throughput computer aided diagnosis system for gliomas. PeerJ Inc. 2018-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6252243/ /pubmed/30498643 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5982 Text en ©2018 Cho et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Radiology and Medical Imaging
Cho, Hwan-ho
Lee, Seung-hak
Kim, Jonghoon
Park, Hyunjin
Classification of the glioma grading using radiomics analysis
title Classification of the glioma grading using radiomics analysis
title_full Classification of the glioma grading using radiomics analysis
title_fullStr Classification of the glioma grading using radiomics analysis
title_full_unstemmed Classification of the glioma grading using radiomics analysis
title_short Classification of the glioma grading using radiomics analysis
title_sort classification of the glioma grading using radiomics analysis
topic Radiology and Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30498643
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5982
work_keys_str_mv AT chohwanho classificationofthegliomagradingusingradiomicsanalysis
AT leeseunghak classificationofthegliomagradingusingradiomicsanalysis
AT kimjonghoon classificationofthegliomagradingusingradiomicsanalysis
AT parkhyunjin classificationofthegliomagradingusingradiomicsanalysis