Cargando…

Differences in Stress-Induced Modulation of the Auditory System Between Wistar and Lewis Rats

Many aspects of stress-induced physiological and psychological effects have been characterized in people and animals. However, stress effects on the auditory system are less explored and their mechanisms are not well-understood, in spite of its relevance for a variety of diseases, including tinnitus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szczepek, Agnieszka J., Dietz, Gunnar P. H., Reich, Uta, Hegend, Olga, Olze, Heidi, Mazurek, Birgit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510499
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00828
_version_ 1783373236857208832
author Szczepek, Agnieszka J.
Dietz, Gunnar P. H.
Reich, Uta
Hegend, Olga
Olze, Heidi
Mazurek, Birgit
author_facet Szczepek, Agnieszka J.
Dietz, Gunnar P. H.
Reich, Uta
Hegend, Olga
Olze, Heidi
Mazurek, Birgit
author_sort Szczepek, Agnieszka J.
collection PubMed
description Many aspects of stress-induced physiological and psychological effects have been characterized in people and animals. However, stress effects on the auditory system are less explored and their mechanisms are not well-understood, in spite of its relevance for a variety of diseases, including tinnitus. To expedite further research of stress-induced changes in the auditory system, here we compare the reactions to stress among Wistar and Lewis rats. The animals were stressed for 24 h, and subsequently we tested the functionality of the outer hair cells (OHCs) using distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and auditory neurons using evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Lastly, using Western blot, we analyzed the levels of plasticity-related proteins in the inferior colliculus, confirming that the inferior colliculus is involved in the adaptive changes that occur in the auditory system upon stress exposure. Surprisingly, the two strains reacted to stress quite differently: Lewis rats displayed a lowering of their auditory threshold, whereas it was increased in Wistar rats. These functional differences were seen in OHCs of the apical region (low frequencies) and in the auditory neurons (across several frequencies) from day 1 until 2 weeks after the experimental stress ended. Wistar and Lewis rats may thus provide models for auditory threshold increase and decrease, respectively, which can both be observed in different patients in response to stress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62523252018-12-03 Differences in Stress-Induced Modulation of the Auditory System Between Wistar and Lewis Rats Szczepek, Agnieszka J. Dietz, Gunnar P. H. Reich, Uta Hegend, Olga Olze, Heidi Mazurek, Birgit Front Neurosci Neuroscience Many aspects of stress-induced physiological and psychological effects have been characterized in people and animals. However, stress effects on the auditory system are less explored and their mechanisms are not well-understood, in spite of its relevance for a variety of diseases, including tinnitus. To expedite further research of stress-induced changes in the auditory system, here we compare the reactions to stress among Wistar and Lewis rats. The animals were stressed for 24 h, and subsequently we tested the functionality of the outer hair cells (OHCs) using distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and auditory neurons using evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Lastly, using Western blot, we analyzed the levels of plasticity-related proteins in the inferior colliculus, confirming that the inferior colliculus is involved in the adaptive changes that occur in the auditory system upon stress exposure. Surprisingly, the two strains reacted to stress quite differently: Lewis rats displayed a lowering of their auditory threshold, whereas it was increased in Wistar rats. These functional differences were seen in OHCs of the apical region (low frequencies) and in the auditory neurons (across several frequencies) from day 1 until 2 weeks after the experimental stress ended. Wistar and Lewis rats may thus provide models for auditory threshold increase and decrease, respectively, which can both be observed in different patients in response to stress. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6252325/ /pubmed/30510499 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00828 Text en Copyright © 2018 Szczepek, Dietz, Reich, Hegend, Olze and Mazurek. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Szczepek, Agnieszka J.
Dietz, Gunnar P. H.
Reich, Uta
Hegend, Olga
Olze, Heidi
Mazurek, Birgit
Differences in Stress-Induced Modulation of the Auditory System Between Wistar and Lewis Rats
title Differences in Stress-Induced Modulation of the Auditory System Between Wistar and Lewis Rats
title_full Differences in Stress-Induced Modulation of the Auditory System Between Wistar and Lewis Rats
title_fullStr Differences in Stress-Induced Modulation of the Auditory System Between Wistar and Lewis Rats
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Stress-Induced Modulation of the Auditory System Between Wistar and Lewis Rats
title_short Differences in Stress-Induced Modulation of the Auditory System Between Wistar and Lewis Rats
title_sort differences in stress-induced modulation of the auditory system between wistar and lewis rats
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510499
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00828
work_keys_str_mv AT szczepekagnieszkaj differencesinstressinducedmodulationoftheauditorysystembetweenwistarandlewisrats
AT dietzgunnarph differencesinstressinducedmodulationoftheauditorysystembetweenwistarandlewisrats
AT reichuta differencesinstressinducedmodulationoftheauditorysystembetweenwistarandlewisrats
AT hegendolga differencesinstressinducedmodulationoftheauditorysystembetweenwistarandlewisrats
AT olzeheidi differencesinstressinducedmodulationoftheauditorysystembetweenwistarandlewisrats
AT mazurekbirgit differencesinstressinducedmodulationoftheauditorysystembetweenwistarandlewisrats