Cargando…
PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial
Background: Major depressive Disorder (MDD) is a severe mental disorder associated with considerable disability and high costs. Over the last decades, various psychotherapies for MDD have been developed and researched, among others Behavioral Activation (BA) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). MCT and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510523 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00584 |
_version_ | 1783373243243036672 |
---|---|
author | Schaich, Anja Heikaus, Laura Assmann, Nele Köhne, Sandra Jauch-Chara, Kamila Hüppe, Michael Wells, Adrian Schweiger, Ulrich Klein, Jan Philipp Fassbinder, Eva |
author_facet | Schaich, Anja Heikaus, Laura Assmann, Nele Köhne, Sandra Jauch-Chara, Kamila Hüppe, Michael Wells, Adrian Schweiger, Ulrich Klein, Jan Philipp Fassbinder, Eva |
author_sort | Schaich, Anja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Major depressive Disorder (MDD) is a severe mental disorder associated with considerable disability and high costs. Over the last decades, various psychotherapies for MDD have been developed and researched, among others Behavioral Activation (BA) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). MCT and BA target different maintaining factors of MDD and have not been compared to date. The PRO(*)MDD randomized controlled trial will compare MCT and BA in the routine clinical setting of an outpatient clinic. Methods and Design: We aim to recruit 128 MDD patients, who will be randomly assigned to either MCT or BA. In both conditions, patients will receive one individual therapy session and one group therapy session per week for a maximum of 6 months. Assessments will take place at baseline, pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment as well as at 12, 18, and 30 months after start of treatment as follow-up. The primary outcome is reduction of depression severity assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; secondary outcomes address quality of life, psychosocial functioning and participation as well as comorbidity. Discussion: The PRO(*)MDD study is the first randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of MCT and BA. The outcome of this trial will increase our knowledge on the effectiveness and applicability of both treatment modalities and therefore contribute to the improvement of treatment for depressive patients. Ethics and dissemination: The study has been reviewed and approved on 11 August 2016 by the Ethics Committee of the Lübeck University (reference number: 16–176). The results will be discussed through peer-reviewed publications. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00011536 (retrospectively registered) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6252351 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62523512018-12-03 PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial Schaich, Anja Heikaus, Laura Assmann, Nele Köhne, Sandra Jauch-Chara, Kamila Hüppe, Michael Wells, Adrian Schweiger, Ulrich Klein, Jan Philipp Fassbinder, Eva Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: Major depressive Disorder (MDD) is a severe mental disorder associated with considerable disability and high costs. Over the last decades, various psychotherapies for MDD have been developed and researched, among others Behavioral Activation (BA) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). MCT and BA target different maintaining factors of MDD and have not been compared to date. The PRO(*)MDD randomized controlled trial will compare MCT and BA in the routine clinical setting of an outpatient clinic. Methods and Design: We aim to recruit 128 MDD patients, who will be randomly assigned to either MCT or BA. In both conditions, patients will receive one individual therapy session and one group therapy session per week for a maximum of 6 months. Assessments will take place at baseline, pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment as well as at 12, 18, and 30 months after start of treatment as follow-up. The primary outcome is reduction of depression severity assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; secondary outcomes address quality of life, psychosocial functioning and participation as well as comorbidity. Discussion: The PRO(*)MDD study is the first randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of MCT and BA. The outcome of this trial will increase our knowledge on the effectiveness and applicability of both treatment modalities and therefore contribute to the improvement of treatment for depressive patients. Ethics and dissemination: The study has been reviewed and approved on 11 August 2016 by the Ethics Committee of the Lübeck University (reference number: 16–176). The results will be discussed through peer-reviewed publications. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00011536 (retrospectively registered) Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6252351/ /pubmed/30510523 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00584 Text en Copyright © 2018 Schaich, Heikaus, Assmann, Köhne, Jauch-Chara, Hüppe, Wells, Schweiger, Klein and Fassbinder. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Schaich, Anja Heikaus, Laura Assmann, Nele Köhne, Sandra Jauch-Chara, Kamila Hüppe, Michael Wells, Adrian Schweiger, Ulrich Klein, Jan Philipp Fassbinder, Eva PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | pro(*)mdd study protocol: effectiveness of outpatient treatment programs for major depressive disorder: metacognitive therapy vs. behavioral activation a single-center randomized clinical trial |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252351/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510523 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00584 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schaichanja promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT heikauslaura promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT assmannnele promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT kohnesandra promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT jauchcharakamila promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT huppemichael promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT wellsadrian promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT schweigerulrich promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT kleinjanphilipp promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial AT fassbindereva promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial |