Cargando…

PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Major depressive Disorder (MDD) is a severe mental disorder associated with considerable disability and high costs. Over the last decades, various psychotherapies for MDD have been developed and researched, among others Behavioral Activation (BA) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). MCT and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schaich, Anja, Heikaus, Laura, Assmann, Nele, Köhne, Sandra, Jauch-Chara, Kamila, Hüppe, Michael, Wells, Adrian, Schweiger, Ulrich, Klein, Jan Philipp, Fassbinder, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510523
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00584
_version_ 1783373243243036672
author Schaich, Anja
Heikaus, Laura
Assmann, Nele
Köhne, Sandra
Jauch-Chara, Kamila
Hüppe, Michael
Wells, Adrian
Schweiger, Ulrich
Klein, Jan Philipp
Fassbinder, Eva
author_facet Schaich, Anja
Heikaus, Laura
Assmann, Nele
Köhne, Sandra
Jauch-Chara, Kamila
Hüppe, Michael
Wells, Adrian
Schweiger, Ulrich
Klein, Jan Philipp
Fassbinder, Eva
author_sort Schaich, Anja
collection PubMed
description Background: Major depressive Disorder (MDD) is a severe mental disorder associated with considerable disability and high costs. Over the last decades, various psychotherapies for MDD have been developed and researched, among others Behavioral Activation (BA) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). MCT and BA target different maintaining factors of MDD and have not been compared to date. The PRO(*)MDD randomized controlled trial will compare MCT and BA in the routine clinical setting of an outpatient clinic. Methods and Design: We aim to recruit 128 MDD patients, who will be randomly assigned to either MCT or BA. In both conditions, patients will receive one individual therapy session and one group therapy session per week for a maximum of 6 months. Assessments will take place at baseline, pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment as well as at 12, 18, and 30 months after start of treatment as follow-up. The primary outcome is reduction of depression severity assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; secondary outcomes address quality of life, psychosocial functioning and participation as well as comorbidity. Discussion: The PRO(*)MDD study is the first randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of MCT and BA. The outcome of this trial will increase our knowledge on the effectiveness and applicability of both treatment modalities and therefore contribute to the improvement of treatment for depressive patients. Ethics and dissemination: The study has been reviewed and approved on 11 August 2016 by the Ethics Committee of the Lübeck University (reference number: 16–176). The results will be discussed through peer-reviewed publications. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00011536 (retrospectively registered)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62523512018-12-03 PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial Schaich, Anja Heikaus, Laura Assmann, Nele Köhne, Sandra Jauch-Chara, Kamila Hüppe, Michael Wells, Adrian Schweiger, Ulrich Klein, Jan Philipp Fassbinder, Eva Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: Major depressive Disorder (MDD) is a severe mental disorder associated with considerable disability and high costs. Over the last decades, various psychotherapies for MDD have been developed and researched, among others Behavioral Activation (BA) and Metacognitive Therapy (MCT). MCT and BA target different maintaining factors of MDD and have not been compared to date. The PRO(*)MDD randomized controlled trial will compare MCT and BA in the routine clinical setting of an outpatient clinic. Methods and Design: We aim to recruit 128 MDD patients, who will be randomly assigned to either MCT or BA. In both conditions, patients will receive one individual therapy session and one group therapy session per week for a maximum of 6 months. Assessments will take place at baseline, pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment as well as at 12, 18, and 30 months after start of treatment as follow-up. The primary outcome is reduction of depression severity assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; secondary outcomes address quality of life, psychosocial functioning and participation as well as comorbidity. Discussion: The PRO(*)MDD study is the first randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of MCT and BA. The outcome of this trial will increase our knowledge on the effectiveness and applicability of both treatment modalities and therefore contribute to the improvement of treatment for depressive patients. Ethics and dissemination: The study has been reviewed and approved on 11 August 2016 by the Ethics Committee of the Lübeck University (reference number: 16–176). The results will be discussed through peer-reviewed publications. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00011536 (retrospectively registered) Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6252351/ /pubmed/30510523 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00584 Text en Copyright © 2018 Schaich, Heikaus, Assmann, Köhne, Jauch-Chara, Hüppe, Wells, Schweiger, Klein and Fassbinder. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Schaich, Anja
Heikaus, Laura
Assmann, Nele
Köhne, Sandra
Jauch-Chara, Kamila
Hüppe, Michael
Wells, Adrian
Schweiger, Ulrich
Klein, Jan Philipp
Fassbinder, Eva
PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial
title PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial
title_fullStr PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial
title_short PRO(*)MDD Study Protocol: Effectiveness of Outpatient Treatment Programs for Major Depressive Disorder: Metacognitive Therapy vs. Behavioral Activation a Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial
title_sort pro(*)mdd study protocol: effectiveness of outpatient treatment programs for major depressive disorder: metacognitive therapy vs. behavioral activation a single-center randomized clinical trial
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510523
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00584
work_keys_str_mv AT schaichanja promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT heikauslaura promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT assmannnele promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kohnesandra promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jauchcharakamila promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT huppemichael promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wellsadrian promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT schweigerulrich promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kleinjanphilipp promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fassbindereva promddstudyprotocoleffectivenessofoutpatienttreatmentprogramsformajordepressivedisordermetacognitivetherapyvsbehavioralactivationasinglecenterrandomizedclinicaltrial