Cargando…
Artificial womb technology and the frontiers of human reproduction: conceptual differences and potential implications
In 2017, a Philadelphia research team revealed the closest thing to an artificial womb (AW) the world had ever seen. The ‘biobag’, if as successful as early animal testing suggests, will change the face of neonatal intensive care. At present, premature neonates born earlier than 22 weeks have no hop...
Autor principal: | Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30097459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-104910 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Artificial womb technology and clinical translation: Innovative treatment or medical research?
por: Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
Publicado: (2019) -
Artificial womb technology, pregnancy, and EU employment rights
por: Hooton, Victoria, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Artificial womb technology and the significance of birth: why gestatelings are not newborns (or fetuses)
por: Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
Publicado: (2019) -
Abortion & ‘artificial wombs’: would ‘artificial womb’ technology legally empower non-gestating genetic progenitors to participate in decisions about how to terminate pregnancy in England and Wales?
por: Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
Publicado: (2021) -
Artificial Womb Technology and the Choice to Gestate Ex Utero: Is Partial Ectogenesis the Business of the Criminal Law?
por: Romanis, Elizabeth Chloe
Publicado: (2019)