Cargando…

2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing meningitis and encephalitis is challenging in the immunosuppressed population. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture is the gold standard diagnostic test for cryptococcal meningitis (CM), but is time intensive and requires a high index of suspicion. The BioFire FilmArray Meningiti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Morgan, Sheets, Jeffery, Hamer, Diana, O’Neal, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252391/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1708
_version_ 1783373252916150272
author Walker, Morgan
Sheets, Jeffery
Hamer, Diana
O’Neal, Catherine
author_facet Walker, Morgan
Sheets, Jeffery
Hamer, Diana
O’Neal, Catherine
author_sort Walker, Morgan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosing meningitis and encephalitis is challenging in the immunosuppressed population. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture is the gold standard diagnostic test for cryptococcal meningitis (CM), but is time intensive and requires a high index of suspicion. The BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) panel offers an option for rapid diagnostic testing. Recent studies suggest similar performance of the ME panel compared with CSF culture in the initial diagnosis and relapse of CM. We investigated the performance of the ME panel in the diagnosis of cryptococcal disease in patients presenting with meningitis. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed at an 800 bed regional medical center between June 1, 2016 and March 1, 2018. Laboratory results for all patients admitted with CSF or serum cryptococcal testing were reviewed. We abstracted the results from 14 distinct hospitalizations involving 12 patients (Figure 1) with CM who had an ME panel and CSF culture. Diagnostic performance was determined by comparison of ME panel to CSF culture. RESULTS: The ME panel demonstrated a 71.43% (95% CI: 29.04–96.33) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI: 59.04–100) specificity for diagnosing CM for the population described in Table 1. ME panel detected all four patients with an initial diagnosis of CM and one of three patients with culture positive relapse. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a negative cryptococcal result on the ME panel should not be used to rule out cryptococcal disease, particularly in patients with a previous diagnosis of CM. Additional testing may increase cost, but until larger studies validate the use of rapid diagnostics, fungal culture remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of CM and should not be eliminated from routine evaluation. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62523912018-11-28 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis Walker, Morgan Sheets, Jeffery Hamer, Diana O’Neal, Catherine Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Diagnosing meningitis and encephalitis is challenging in the immunosuppressed population. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture is the gold standard diagnostic test for cryptococcal meningitis (CM), but is time intensive and requires a high index of suspicion. The BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) panel offers an option for rapid diagnostic testing. Recent studies suggest similar performance of the ME panel compared with CSF culture in the initial diagnosis and relapse of CM. We investigated the performance of the ME panel in the diagnosis of cryptococcal disease in patients presenting with meningitis. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed at an 800 bed regional medical center between June 1, 2016 and March 1, 2018. Laboratory results for all patients admitted with CSF or serum cryptococcal testing were reviewed. We abstracted the results from 14 distinct hospitalizations involving 12 patients (Figure 1) with CM who had an ME panel and CSF culture. Diagnostic performance was determined by comparison of ME panel to CSF culture. RESULTS: The ME panel demonstrated a 71.43% (95% CI: 29.04–96.33) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI: 59.04–100) specificity for diagnosing CM for the population described in Table 1. ME panel detected all four patients with an initial diagnosis of CM and one of three patients with culture positive relapse. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a negative cryptococcal result on the ME panel should not be used to rule out cryptococcal disease, particularly in patients with a previous diagnosis of CM. Additional testing may increase cost, but until larger studies validate the use of rapid diagnostics, fungal culture remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of CM and should not be eliminated from routine evaluation. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252391/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1708 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Walker, Morgan
Sheets, Jeffery
Hamer, Diana
O’Neal, Catherine
2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis
title 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis
title_full 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis
title_fullStr 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis
title_short 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis
title_sort 2052. performance of the biofire filmarray meningitis/encephalitis panel in cryptococcal meningitis diagnosis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252391/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1708
work_keys_str_mv AT walkermorgan 2052performanceofthebiofirefilmarraymeningitisencephalitispanelincryptococcalmeningitisdiagnosis
AT sheetsjeffery 2052performanceofthebiofirefilmarraymeningitisencephalitispanelincryptococcalmeningitisdiagnosis
AT hamerdiana 2052performanceofthebiofirefilmarraymeningitisencephalitispanelincryptococcalmeningitisdiagnosis
AT onealcatherine 2052performanceofthebiofirefilmarraymeningitisencephalitispanelincryptococcalmeningitisdiagnosis