Cargando…
2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis
BACKGROUND: Diagnosing meningitis and encephalitis is challenging in the immunosuppressed population. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture is the gold standard diagnostic test for cryptococcal meningitis (CM), but is time intensive and requires a high index of suspicion. The BioFire FilmArray Meningiti...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252391/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1708 |
_version_ | 1783373252916150272 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Morgan Sheets, Jeffery Hamer, Diana O’Neal, Catherine |
author_facet | Walker, Morgan Sheets, Jeffery Hamer, Diana O’Neal, Catherine |
author_sort | Walker, Morgan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Diagnosing meningitis and encephalitis is challenging in the immunosuppressed population. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture is the gold standard diagnostic test for cryptococcal meningitis (CM), but is time intensive and requires a high index of suspicion. The BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) panel offers an option for rapid diagnostic testing. Recent studies suggest similar performance of the ME panel compared with CSF culture in the initial diagnosis and relapse of CM. We investigated the performance of the ME panel in the diagnosis of cryptococcal disease in patients presenting with meningitis. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed at an 800 bed regional medical center between June 1, 2016 and March 1, 2018. Laboratory results for all patients admitted with CSF or serum cryptococcal testing were reviewed. We abstracted the results from 14 distinct hospitalizations involving 12 patients (Figure 1) with CM who had an ME panel and CSF culture. Diagnostic performance was determined by comparison of ME panel to CSF culture. RESULTS: The ME panel demonstrated a 71.43% (95% CI: 29.04–96.33) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI: 59.04–100) specificity for diagnosing CM for the population described in Table 1. ME panel detected all four patients with an initial diagnosis of CM and one of three patients with culture positive relapse. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a negative cryptococcal result on the ME panel should not be used to rule out cryptococcal disease, particularly in patients with a previous diagnosis of CM. Additional testing may increase cost, but until larger studies validate the use of rapid diagnostics, fungal culture remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of CM and should not be eliminated from routine evaluation. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6252391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62523912018-11-28 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis Walker, Morgan Sheets, Jeffery Hamer, Diana O’Neal, Catherine Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Diagnosing meningitis and encephalitis is challenging in the immunosuppressed population. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture is the gold standard diagnostic test for cryptococcal meningitis (CM), but is time intensive and requires a high index of suspicion. The BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) panel offers an option for rapid diagnostic testing. Recent studies suggest similar performance of the ME panel compared with CSF culture in the initial diagnosis and relapse of CM. We investigated the performance of the ME panel in the diagnosis of cryptococcal disease in patients presenting with meningitis. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed at an 800 bed regional medical center between June 1, 2016 and March 1, 2018. Laboratory results for all patients admitted with CSF or serum cryptococcal testing were reviewed. We abstracted the results from 14 distinct hospitalizations involving 12 patients (Figure 1) with CM who had an ME panel and CSF culture. Diagnostic performance was determined by comparison of ME panel to CSF culture. RESULTS: The ME panel demonstrated a 71.43% (95% CI: 29.04–96.33) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI: 59.04–100) specificity for diagnosing CM for the population described in Table 1. ME panel detected all four patients with an initial diagnosis of CM and one of three patients with culture positive relapse. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a negative cryptococcal result on the ME panel should not be used to rule out cryptococcal disease, particularly in patients with a previous diagnosis of CM. Additional testing may increase cost, but until larger studies validate the use of rapid diagnostics, fungal culture remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of CM and should not be eliminated from routine evaluation. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252391/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1708 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Walker, Morgan Sheets, Jeffery Hamer, Diana O’Neal, Catherine 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis |
title | 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis |
title_full | 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis |
title_fullStr | 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis |
title_short | 2052. Performance of the Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel in Cryptococcal Meningitis Diagnosis |
title_sort | 2052. performance of the biofire filmarray meningitis/encephalitis panel in cryptococcal meningitis diagnosis |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252391/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1708 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkermorgan 2052performanceofthebiofirefilmarraymeningitisencephalitispanelincryptococcalmeningitisdiagnosis AT sheetsjeffery 2052performanceofthebiofirefilmarraymeningitisencephalitispanelincryptococcalmeningitisdiagnosis AT hamerdiana 2052performanceofthebiofirefilmarraymeningitisencephalitispanelincryptococcalmeningitisdiagnosis AT onealcatherine 2052performanceofthebiofirefilmarraymeningitisencephalitispanelincryptococcalmeningitisdiagnosis |