1638. Tele-Infectious Disease Consultation Produces Equivalent Outcomes as In-Person Consultation

BACKGROUND: Technology can extend Infection Disease Consultants (IDCs) into resource limited small community US hospitals. We compared in-person infectious disease (ID) consults with Tele-ID consults to determine whether length of stay, antibiotic usage, drug cost, or readmission rates will remain the same between both groups over a 3-month period. METHODS: University of Maryland Harford Memorial Hospital (UM-HMH) is a 95-bed hospital including a 6-bed ICU. From May to August 2017 (study period) there was no IDC at UM-HMH. During study period, IDCs from a regional UM hospital provided formal Tele-ID consults through an HIPAA compliant secured Skype Business account. Patient history and wound examination were done by the IDC via video monitor while a bedside nurse assisted in performing the physical examination. Laboratory and radiological data were reviewed in real time as both hospitals shared the same electronic medical record and IT infrastructure (Meditech 6.15). A formal consultation was dictated and computer orders were entered by the IDC within 24 hours of the consult request. Daily Tele-ID follow-up rounds were conducted. IDCs had the authority to transfer a patient to the regional hospital for in-person care if deemed necessary. Study period was compared with a baseline period (May–August 2016) when IDCs were providing in-person consults at UM-HMH. RESULTS: Baseline period had 148 inpatient stays and study period had 148 inpatient stays. Despite similar case mix index in both groups, there was no statistical difference between the clinical outcomes. Results are shown in Table 1. CONCLUSION: Tele-ID at our hospitals was noninferior to in-person ID consults. An integrated computer system, nursing support, and daily follow-up are key components of a successful Tele-ID program. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.