Cargando…

1277. Universal Screening Is Key: Identifying Gaps in Adolescent HIV Infection Diagnosis at Local Pediatric Health System When Compared With Regional Adult Hospital

BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed sexual partners with HIV infection may contribute to up to 30% of new infections annually. Routine HIV screening of high-risk populations has been shown to be effective and is recommended by the CDC. Despite this recommendation, many adolescents are not screened. The negative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Most, Zachary, James, Lorraine, Warraich, Gohar, Costello, Kathleen, Dietz, Stephen, Evans, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252406/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1110
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed sexual partners with HIV infection may contribute to up to 30% of new infections annually. Routine HIV screening of high-risk populations has been shown to be effective and is recommended by the CDC. Despite this recommendation, many adolescents are not screened. The negative impact on the adolescent population from inadequate screening has not been fully quantified. METHODS: Through a retrospective chart review, the course prior to diagnosis of HIV-infected adolescents diagnosed at Children’s Medical Center Dallas (CMC) and Parkland Hospital (PH, the proximate adult county hospital with a universal HIV screening program) was reviewed. Subjects were included if they had a confirmed, positive HIV test between 13 and 21 years of age, and excluded if they had a previous HIV diagnosis. Inpatient, outpatient, and ED encounters at CMC and PH following the subjects’ 13th birthday and before their HIV diagnosis were quantified. Missed opportunity encounters (MOE) were defined as above encounters where there was no HIV screen performed that took place after the date 3 months following their most recent HIV screen. Data were collated by facility and compared. RESULTS: 204 subjects met inclusion criteria: 140 (69%) male, 155 (76%) black, and 87 (43%) followed by CMC. There were 412 total encounters (2.02 per subject) out of which 284 (1.39 per subject) qualified as MOE. Seventy-two subjects had at least one MOE. At the CMC ED, there were 6.7 MOE for every new HIV adolescent diagnosis, compared with PH ED where there were 0.9 (P < 0.01) (Figure 1). Adolescents identified through the PH ED were older (PH, 18.8 years vs. CMC, 16.1 years, P < 0.01) (Figure 2), and had a trend toward a lower CD4 count (PH, 337 cells/m(3) vs. CMC, 449 cells/m(3), ns). Three adolescents were identified with AIDS (CD4 <200) through HIV screening at PH, vs. 1 at the CMC ED. CONCLUSION: Missed opportunity encounters for HIV screening of adolescents are greater in number in pediatric emergency departments without universal screening programs, when compared with similar adult settings with such a program. Implementing a universal HIV screening protocol at pediatric EDs in HIV endemic areas may help to identify HIV-positive adolescents at younger ages and improve long-term outcomes. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.