Cargando…

1472. Antibiotic De-escalation Compared with Continued Empirical Treatment in Non-Ventilated Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic de-escalation is an important component of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Nosocomial pneumonia is the most common healthcare-associated infection with nonventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) comprising the majority of cases. We aimed to compare antibiotic de-escal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alnaimi, Shaikha, Rawson, Timothy, Holmes, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252463/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1302
_version_ 1783373270016327680
author Alnaimi, Shaikha
Rawson, Timothy
Holmes, Alison
author_facet Alnaimi, Shaikha
Rawson, Timothy
Holmes, Alison
author_sort Alnaimi, Shaikha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antibiotic de-escalation is an important component of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Nosocomial pneumonia is the most common healthcare-associated infection with nonventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) comprising the majority of cases. We aimed to compare antibiotic de-escalation with continued empirical treatment in terms of clinical outcomes in nonventilated HAP. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients meeting the American Thoracic Society criteria for HAP. This compared de-escalated HAP patients to those continued on empirical treatment across three hospitals in West London over 3 months. The primary outcome was the length of stay (LOS), and secondary outcomes were duration of treatment and cost of hospital stay. Effects were adjusted for confounders using multivariate linear regression models. RESULTS: Eighty patients with HAP were identified. Overall, 22/80 (27.5%) had therapy de-escalated and 47/80 (58.8%) continued empirical treatment. A total of 58 patients survived and were included in the analysis, 20 in de-escalation and 38 in continued empirical treatment. Length of stay was shorter in de-escalation by −7.2 (95% CI −12.2, −3.0) days, P < 0.01, with an adjusted difference of −3.2 (95% CI −8.3, 1.9) days, P = 0.21. The duration of treatment was shorter in de-escalation by −3.4 (95% CI −5.8, −0.9) days, P < 0.01, with an adjusted difference of −2.6 (95% CI −5.2, 0.1) days, P = 0.06. The cost of hospital stay was lower in de-escalation by £-2, 907.37 (95% CI −4,865.31, −949.43), P < 0.01, with an adjusted difference of £-1,290.00 (95% CI −3,320.75, 740.74), P = 0.21. CONCLUSION: In HAP, 27.5% of patients were de-escalated. There was no difference in LOS, duration of treatment, and cost of hospital stay between de-escalation and continued empirical treatment on adjustment for confounders. Future work should explore the relationship between de-escalation and antimicrobial resistance in HAP. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62524632018-11-28 1472. Antibiotic De-escalation Compared with Continued Empirical Treatment in Non-Ventilated Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Alnaimi, Shaikha Rawson, Timothy Holmes, Alison Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antibiotic de-escalation is an important component of antimicrobial stewardship programs. Nosocomial pneumonia is the most common healthcare-associated infection with nonventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) comprising the majority of cases. We aimed to compare antibiotic de-escalation with continued empirical treatment in terms of clinical outcomes in nonventilated HAP. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients meeting the American Thoracic Society criteria for HAP. This compared de-escalated HAP patients to those continued on empirical treatment across three hospitals in West London over 3 months. The primary outcome was the length of stay (LOS), and secondary outcomes were duration of treatment and cost of hospital stay. Effects were adjusted for confounders using multivariate linear regression models. RESULTS: Eighty patients with HAP were identified. Overall, 22/80 (27.5%) had therapy de-escalated and 47/80 (58.8%) continued empirical treatment. A total of 58 patients survived and were included in the analysis, 20 in de-escalation and 38 in continued empirical treatment. Length of stay was shorter in de-escalation by −7.2 (95% CI −12.2, −3.0) days, P < 0.01, with an adjusted difference of −3.2 (95% CI −8.3, 1.9) days, P = 0.21. The duration of treatment was shorter in de-escalation by −3.4 (95% CI −5.8, −0.9) days, P < 0.01, with an adjusted difference of −2.6 (95% CI −5.2, 0.1) days, P = 0.06. The cost of hospital stay was lower in de-escalation by £-2, 907.37 (95% CI −4,865.31, −949.43), P < 0.01, with an adjusted difference of £-1,290.00 (95% CI −3,320.75, 740.74), P = 0.21. CONCLUSION: In HAP, 27.5% of patients were de-escalated. There was no difference in LOS, duration of treatment, and cost of hospital stay between de-escalation and continued empirical treatment on adjustment for confounders. Future work should explore the relationship between de-escalation and antimicrobial resistance in HAP. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252463/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1302 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Alnaimi, Shaikha
Rawson, Timothy
Holmes, Alison
1472. Antibiotic De-escalation Compared with Continued Empirical Treatment in Non-Ventilated Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
title 1472. Antibiotic De-escalation Compared with Continued Empirical Treatment in Non-Ventilated Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
title_full 1472. Antibiotic De-escalation Compared with Continued Empirical Treatment in Non-Ventilated Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
title_fullStr 1472. Antibiotic De-escalation Compared with Continued Empirical Treatment in Non-Ventilated Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed 1472. Antibiotic De-escalation Compared with Continued Empirical Treatment in Non-Ventilated Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
title_short 1472. Antibiotic De-escalation Compared with Continued Empirical Treatment in Non-Ventilated Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia
title_sort 1472. antibiotic de-escalation compared with continued empirical treatment in non-ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252463/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1302
work_keys_str_mv AT alnaimishaikha 1472antibioticdeescalationcomparedwithcontinuedempiricaltreatmentinnonventilatedhospitalacquiredpneumonia
AT rawsontimothy 1472antibioticdeescalationcomparedwithcontinuedempiricaltreatmentinnonventilatedhospitalacquiredpneumonia
AT holmesalison 1472antibioticdeescalationcomparedwithcontinuedempiricaltreatmentinnonventilatedhospitalacquiredpneumonia