Cargando…

1848. Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in Outpatient Clinics for the Treatment of Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory visits for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) have doubled over the past decade and are one of the most common reasons for infection-related visits to outpatient clinics. However, there is limited data evaluating antibiotic prescribing in this population....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Redman, Bailey, Petty, Lindsay, Nagel, Jerod
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252524/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1504
_version_ 1783373282217558016
author Redman, Bailey
Petty, Lindsay
Nagel, Jerod
author_facet Redman, Bailey
Petty, Lindsay
Nagel, Jerod
author_sort Redman, Bailey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ambulatory visits for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) have doubled over the past decade and are one of the most common reasons for infection-related visits to outpatient clinics. However, there is limited data evaluating antibiotic prescribing in this population. We aimed to assess the management of SSTIs in adult patients in order to target interventions to improve antibiotic utilization and optimize outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients within a large academic healthcare system presenting to 38 clinics. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of a SSTI (ICD-10 for cutaneous abscess, cellulitis, and local SSTIs) in 2016. The primary outcome was to evaluate prescriber compliance to institutional guidelines based on antibiotic selection and duration of therapy. Patient allergies and culture results were used when determining compliance to first-line (trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole for cutaneous abscess, or cephalexin +/- trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole for cellulitis and local SSTIs) and second-line recommendations (doxycycline for cutaneous abscess, or clindamycin for cellulitis and local SSTIs). Duration of therapy of 5–7 days was considered compliant. RESULTS: A total of 2,170 adult encounters for the treatment of SSTIs were included; 1,588 with cellulitis, 413 with local infection and 169 with cutaneous abscess. The overall compliance rate for appropriate therapy, including drug selection and duration, was 64.9% (see Figure 1). Unnecessarily long duration of therapy resulted in an extra 1,637 days of antibiotic therapy. Compliance with drug selection occurred more frequently with physicians (40.3%) compared with residents (33.9%) and Advanced Practice Providers (APP) (25.1%). CONCLUSION: Compliance with an institutional SSTI guideline for antibiotic selection and duration of therapy is suboptimal in outpatient clinics. Stewardship interventions for SSTIs should target both drug selection and duration, and APPs as an important provider group in outpatient settings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252524
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62525242018-11-28 1848. Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in Outpatient Clinics for the Treatment of Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections Redman, Bailey Petty, Lindsay Nagel, Jerod Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Ambulatory visits for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) have doubled over the past decade and are one of the most common reasons for infection-related visits to outpatient clinics. However, there is limited data evaluating antibiotic prescribing in this population. We aimed to assess the management of SSTIs in adult patients in order to target interventions to improve antibiotic utilization and optimize outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients within a large academic healthcare system presenting to 38 clinics. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of a SSTI (ICD-10 for cutaneous abscess, cellulitis, and local SSTIs) in 2016. The primary outcome was to evaluate prescriber compliance to institutional guidelines based on antibiotic selection and duration of therapy. Patient allergies and culture results were used when determining compliance to first-line (trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole for cutaneous abscess, or cephalexin +/- trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole for cellulitis and local SSTIs) and second-line recommendations (doxycycline for cutaneous abscess, or clindamycin for cellulitis and local SSTIs). Duration of therapy of 5–7 days was considered compliant. RESULTS: A total of 2,170 adult encounters for the treatment of SSTIs were included; 1,588 with cellulitis, 413 with local infection and 169 with cutaneous abscess. The overall compliance rate for appropriate therapy, including drug selection and duration, was 64.9% (see Figure 1). Unnecessarily long duration of therapy resulted in an extra 1,637 days of antibiotic therapy. Compliance with drug selection occurred more frequently with physicians (40.3%) compared with residents (33.9%) and Advanced Practice Providers (APP) (25.1%). CONCLUSION: Compliance with an institutional SSTI guideline for antibiotic selection and duration of therapy is suboptimal in outpatient clinics. Stewardship interventions for SSTIs should target both drug selection and duration, and APPs as an important provider group in outpatient settings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252524/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1504 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Redman, Bailey
Petty, Lindsay
Nagel, Jerod
1848. Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in Outpatient Clinics for the Treatment of Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections
title 1848. Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in Outpatient Clinics for the Treatment of Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections
title_full 1848. Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in Outpatient Clinics for the Treatment of Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections
title_fullStr 1848. Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in Outpatient Clinics for the Treatment of Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections
title_full_unstemmed 1848. Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in Outpatient Clinics for the Treatment of Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections
title_short 1848. Evaluation of Antibiotic Prescribing Practices in Outpatient Clinics for the Treatment of Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections
title_sort 1848. evaluation of antibiotic prescribing practices in outpatient clinics for the treatment of skin and soft-tissue infections
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252524/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1504
work_keys_str_mv AT redmanbailey 1848evaluationofantibioticprescribingpracticesinoutpatientclinicsforthetreatmentofskinandsofttissueinfections
AT pettylindsay 1848evaluationofantibioticprescribingpracticesinoutpatientclinicsforthetreatmentofskinandsofttissueinfections
AT nageljerod 1848evaluationofantibioticprescribingpracticesinoutpatientclinicsforthetreatmentofskinandsofttissueinfections