Cargando…

1177. Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Colonization Screening Surveys, Maryland, April 2017–April 2018

BACKGROUND: In April 2017, the Maryland Department of Health (MDH) began screening healthcare contacts of confirmed cases of carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant organisms (CP-CROs) to identify potential transmission, per guidance published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brooks, Richard B, Vaeth, Elisabeth, Jani, Niketa M, Dominguez, Catherine E, Johnston, Jonathan R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252535/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1010
_version_ 1783373284876746752
author Brooks, Richard B
Vaeth, Elisabeth
Jani, Niketa M
Dominguez, Catherine E
Johnston, Jonathan R
author_facet Brooks, Richard B
Vaeth, Elisabeth
Jani, Niketa M
Dominguez, Catherine E
Johnston, Jonathan R
author_sort Brooks, Richard B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In April 2017, the Maryland Department of Health (MDH) began screening healthcare contacts of confirmed cases of carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant organisms (CP-CROs) to identify potential transmission, per guidance published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The results of MDH’s CP-CRO colonization screening surveys (CSSs) conducted as of April 1, 2018, are summarized. METHODS: Rectal swabs were collected on epidemiologically linked CP-CRO contacts and sent to the MDH Laboratories Administration, where the Cepheid Xpert® Carba-R assay was used to detect five carbapenemases: Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), Verona integron encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), imipenemase (IMP), and oxacillinase-48-like carbapenemase (OXA-48). Identification of CP-CROs in contacts sometimes resulted in additional CSSs to ensure complete case detection. Non-KPC cases were combined for analysis. RESULTS: During April 1, 2017–April 1, 2018, MDH received reports of 278 incident cases of confirmed CP-CROs. Of these, 16 (6%) expressed non-KPC carbapenemases. The 7 (3%) cases with healthcare contacts prompting CSSs led to screening of 132 first-round contacts, with additional CP-CROs identified in 13 (10%), all of which had KPC. Of these, 12 (92%) resided in ventilator units of skilled nursing facilities (vSNFs). In the first-round CSS at one vSNF, 64% of screened contacts were positive for KPC, which had not been identified in the index case. Weekly follow-up CP-CRO admission screenings and serial follow-up CSSs at the vSNF resulted in screening of a total of 72 unique patients; 38 (53%) were KPC-positive. Of these 38 cases, 32 (89%) were previously unidentified and were placed on contact precautions if not already on them. Staff were re-trained in infection prevention (IP) techniques, and staff and KPC-positive patients were cohorted. CONCLUSION: Detection of CP-CROs that express non-KPC carbapenemases in Maryland is rare, and transmission of these carbapenemases has not been identified. However, CSSs identified previously unknown cases of KPC, most commonly in vSNFs, demonstrating the utility of CSSs to detect CP-CROs, and resulting in important IP interventions. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62525352018-11-28 1177. Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Colonization Screening Surveys, Maryland, April 2017–April 2018 Brooks, Richard B Vaeth, Elisabeth Jani, Niketa M Dominguez, Catherine E Johnston, Jonathan R Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: In April 2017, the Maryland Department of Health (MDH) began screening healthcare contacts of confirmed cases of carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant organisms (CP-CROs) to identify potential transmission, per guidance published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The results of MDH’s CP-CRO colonization screening surveys (CSSs) conducted as of April 1, 2018, are summarized. METHODS: Rectal swabs were collected on epidemiologically linked CP-CRO contacts and sent to the MDH Laboratories Administration, where the Cepheid Xpert® Carba-R assay was used to detect five carbapenemases: Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), Verona integron encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM), imipenemase (IMP), and oxacillinase-48-like carbapenemase (OXA-48). Identification of CP-CROs in contacts sometimes resulted in additional CSSs to ensure complete case detection. Non-KPC cases were combined for analysis. RESULTS: During April 1, 2017–April 1, 2018, MDH received reports of 278 incident cases of confirmed CP-CROs. Of these, 16 (6%) expressed non-KPC carbapenemases. The 7 (3%) cases with healthcare contacts prompting CSSs led to screening of 132 first-round contacts, with additional CP-CROs identified in 13 (10%), all of which had KPC. Of these, 12 (92%) resided in ventilator units of skilled nursing facilities (vSNFs). In the first-round CSS at one vSNF, 64% of screened contacts were positive for KPC, which had not been identified in the index case. Weekly follow-up CP-CRO admission screenings and serial follow-up CSSs at the vSNF resulted in screening of a total of 72 unique patients; 38 (53%) were KPC-positive. Of these 38 cases, 32 (89%) were previously unidentified and were placed on contact precautions if not already on them. Staff were re-trained in infection prevention (IP) techniques, and staff and KPC-positive patients were cohorted. CONCLUSION: Detection of CP-CROs that express non-KPC carbapenemases in Maryland is rare, and transmission of these carbapenemases has not been identified. However, CSSs identified previously unknown cases of KPC, most commonly in vSNFs, demonstrating the utility of CSSs to detect CP-CROs, and resulting in important IP interventions. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252535/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1010 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Brooks, Richard B
Vaeth, Elisabeth
Jani, Niketa M
Dominguez, Catherine E
Johnston, Jonathan R
1177. Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Colonization Screening Surveys, Maryland, April 2017–April 2018
title 1177. Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Colonization Screening Surveys, Maryland, April 2017–April 2018
title_full 1177. Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Colonization Screening Surveys, Maryland, April 2017–April 2018
title_fullStr 1177. Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Colonization Screening Surveys, Maryland, April 2017–April 2018
title_full_unstemmed 1177. Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Colonization Screening Surveys, Maryland, April 2017–April 2018
title_short 1177. Carbapenemase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Organism Colonization Screening Surveys, Maryland, April 2017–April 2018
title_sort 1177. carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant organism colonization screening surveys, maryland, april 2017–april 2018
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252535/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1010
work_keys_str_mv AT brooksrichardb 1177carbapenemaseproducingcarbapenemresistantorganismcolonizationscreeningsurveysmarylandapril2017april2018
AT vaethelisabeth 1177carbapenemaseproducingcarbapenemresistantorganismcolonizationscreeningsurveysmarylandapril2017april2018
AT janiniketam 1177carbapenemaseproducingcarbapenemresistantorganismcolonizationscreeningsurveysmarylandapril2017april2018
AT dominguezcatherinee 1177carbapenemaseproducingcarbapenemresistantorganismcolonizationscreeningsurveysmarylandapril2017april2018
AT johnstonjonathanr 1177carbapenemaseproducingcarbapenemresistantorganismcolonizationscreeningsurveysmarylandapril2017april2018