Cargando…
1457. Escherichia coli Community Acquired Pneumonia
BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli has been thought to be an uncommon cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Large epidemiological data on E. coli CAP (E-CAP) and its comparison to pneumococcal CAP (P-CAP) are lacking. METHODS: A multi-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients (aged ≥ 18 y...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252561/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1287 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli has been thought to be an uncommon cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Large epidemiological data on E. coli CAP (E-CAP) and its comparison to pneumococcal CAP (P-CAP) are lacking. METHODS: A multi-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) admitted to 140 US hospitals with pneumonia and/or sepsis from 2010–2015, included in the Premier Research database. Patients with community-onset infection, antibiotic treatment beginning within the first 2 hospital days, and continued for at least 3 consecutive days were included. Patients were excluded if they had been transferred from another acute care facility, had cystic fibrosis, had a hospital length of stay of 1 day or less, co-existent urinary tract infection, gastrointestinal/ intra-abdominal infection, or simultaneous presence of other CAP pathogens. Pneumonia and sepsis were identified by ICD-9 codes. RESULTS: A total of 13,165 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 1,247 had E. coli CAP. Majority of patients with E-CAP were nonnursing home residents (90.2%, 1,125/1,247). 69.3% (864/1,247) patients with E-CAP presented with”sepsis syndrome’ compared with only 48.1% in other Gram-negative CAP and 62.5% in P-CAP. Aspiration pneumonia was diagnosed in 5.9% (73/1,247) with E-CAP. Blood cultures were positive in 59.9% (748/1,247) of patients with E-CAP with 84.8% positivity in patients with sepsis syndrome. Patients with E-CAP compared with P-CAP were more likely to require ICU-level care (42.6% vs. 38.2%), mechanical ventilation (19.3% vs. 15.7%), and require vasopressors (21% vs. 13.8%). In-hospital mortality was 14.8% in E-CAP compared with 7.4% in P-CAP. The median cost of hospitalization was great in E-CAP than P-CAP ($12,420.1 vs. $9,857.5) Re-admission within 30 days was greater among patients with E-CAP than P-CAP (5.4% vs. 4%). 36.8% of isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolones, 10.4% to ceftriaxone and 18.1% to aminoglycosides. Only 10/1,247(0.8%) were multi-drug-resistant. CONCLUSION: E. coli is an important cause of severe CAP, with higher mortality, greater need for ICU-level care, and higher re-admission rates than patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. The rate of fluoroquinolone resistance was high and empiric quinolones should be used with caution for patients who are critically ill due to E-CAP DISCLOSURES: A. Deshpande, 3M: Investigator, Research support; Clorox: Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Research grant and Speaker honorarium; Merck: Investigator and Speaker’s Bureau, Research support. |
---|