Cargando…

979. Standardizing Medical Student Learning for Infectious Diseases Consult Electives: Prioritizing Content

BACKGROUND: The goals of 4th-year medical student electives vary, and students’ learning during clinical electives may occur solely through the subspecialty cases that students encounter. We aim to standardize learning during electives by creating a toolkit to guide elective directors in the develop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdoler, Emily, Hauer, Karen, Schwartz, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252602/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy209.095
_version_ 1783373300845510656
author Abdoler, Emily
Hauer, Karen
Schwartz, Brian
author_facet Abdoler, Emily
Hauer, Karen
Schwartz, Brian
author_sort Abdoler, Emily
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The goals of 4th-year medical student electives vary, and students’ learning during clinical electives may occur solely through the subspecialty cases that students encounter. We aim to standardize learning during electives by creating a toolkit to guide elective directors in the development of curricula that reinforce basic science principles, highlight areas for high-value care, and provide opportunities for further inquiry. The first step is to determine the core specialty topics applicable to students regardless of career choice. Here, we describe this content prioritization process within the context of an infectious diseases (ID) elective pilot curriculum. METHODS: We conducted a modified, 2-round Delphi process to develop consensus on ID topics that all graduating medical students should know. Through review of the literature for common diagnoses and high value care, and the medical school curriculum, the authors generated an initial list of 16 topics. An interdisciplinary group of 90 expert faculty educators from Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Surgery rated these topics’ importance using a 5-point Likert scale, from 0 (absolutely do not include) to 4 (very important). We considered items rated at least 3 (important) by at least 80% of participants to have reached consensus. RESULTS: Sixty of 90 (67%) educators responded to the initial survey, and 48/60 (80%) completed both surveys. Nine additional topics were proposed by first-round participants. After the second round, 14 topics met the consensus criterion. Many common conditions, several dangerous infections, and infectious issues overrepresented in the local population met consensus. However, while many of the topics failing to meet consensus addressed rare conditions or those typically managed by subspecialists, some were also common conditions. CONCLUSION: Standardizing medical student learning during elective rotations begins with identifying key topics. Our process included a diverse group of educators to determine key topics. We will use this list to guide the content of a new asynchronous, online ID elective curriculum, and we will describe our process as part of a curriculum development toolkit for other elective directors. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62526022018-11-28 979. Standardizing Medical Student Learning for Infectious Diseases Consult Electives: Prioritizing Content Abdoler, Emily Hauer, Karen Schwartz, Brian Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The goals of 4th-year medical student electives vary, and students’ learning during clinical electives may occur solely through the subspecialty cases that students encounter. We aim to standardize learning during electives by creating a toolkit to guide elective directors in the development of curricula that reinforce basic science principles, highlight areas for high-value care, and provide opportunities for further inquiry. The first step is to determine the core specialty topics applicable to students regardless of career choice. Here, we describe this content prioritization process within the context of an infectious diseases (ID) elective pilot curriculum. METHODS: We conducted a modified, 2-round Delphi process to develop consensus on ID topics that all graduating medical students should know. Through review of the literature for common diagnoses and high value care, and the medical school curriculum, the authors generated an initial list of 16 topics. An interdisciplinary group of 90 expert faculty educators from Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, Emergency Medicine, and Surgery rated these topics’ importance using a 5-point Likert scale, from 0 (absolutely do not include) to 4 (very important). We considered items rated at least 3 (important) by at least 80% of participants to have reached consensus. RESULTS: Sixty of 90 (67%) educators responded to the initial survey, and 48/60 (80%) completed both surveys. Nine additional topics were proposed by first-round participants. After the second round, 14 topics met the consensus criterion. Many common conditions, several dangerous infections, and infectious issues overrepresented in the local population met consensus. However, while many of the topics failing to meet consensus addressed rare conditions or those typically managed by subspecialists, some were also common conditions. CONCLUSION: Standardizing medical student learning during elective rotations begins with identifying key topics. Our process included a diverse group of educators to determine key topics. We will use this list to guide the content of a new asynchronous, online ID elective curriculum, and we will describe our process as part of a curriculum development toolkit for other elective directors. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252602/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy209.095 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Abdoler, Emily
Hauer, Karen
Schwartz, Brian
979. Standardizing Medical Student Learning for Infectious Diseases Consult Electives: Prioritizing Content
title 979. Standardizing Medical Student Learning for Infectious Diseases Consult Electives: Prioritizing Content
title_full 979. Standardizing Medical Student Learning for Infectious Diseases Consult Electives: Prioritizing Content
title_fullStr 979. Standardizing Medical Student Learning for Infectious Diseases Consult Electives: Prioritizing Content
title_full_unstemmed 979. Standardizing Medical Student Learning for Infectious Diseases Consult Electives: Prioritizing Content
title_short 979. Standardizing Medical Student Learning for Infectious Diseases Consult Electives: Prioritizing Content
title_sort 979. standardizing medical student learning for infectious diseases consult electives: prioritizing content
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252602/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy209.095
work_keys_str_mv AT abdoleremily 979standardizingmedicalstudentlearningforinfectiousdiseasesconsultelectivesprioritizingcontent
AT hauerkaren 979standardizingmedicalstudentlearningforinfectiousdiseasesconsultelectivesprioritizingcontent
AT schwartzbrian 979standardizingmedicalstudentlearningforinfectiousdiseasesconsultelectivesprioritizingcontent