Cargando…

Reliability and accuracy of delirium assessments among investigators at multiple international centres

INTRODUCTION: Delirium is a common, serious postoperative complication. For clinical studies to generate valid findings, delirium assessments must be standardised and administered accurately by independent researchers. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a widely used delirium assessment tool....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maybrier, Hannah R, Mickle, Angela M, Escallier, Krisztina E, Lin, Nan, Schmitt, Eva M, Upadhyayula, Ravi T, Wildes, Troy S, Mashour, George A, Palihnich, Kerry, Inouye, Sharon K, Avidan, Michael Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023137
_version_ 1783373310612996096
author Maybrier, Hannah R
Mickle, Angela M
Escallier, Krisztina E
Lin, Nan
Schmitt, Eva M
Upadhyayula, Ravi T
Wildes, Troy S
Mashour, George A
Palihnich, Kerry
Inouye, Sharon K
Avidan, Michael Simon
author_facet Maybrier, Hannah R
Mickle, Angela M
Escallier, Krisztina E
Lin, Nan
Schmitt, Eva M
Upadhyayula, Ravi T
Wildes, Troy S
Mashour, George A
Palihnich, Kerry
Inouye, Sharon K
Avidan, Michael Simon
author_sort Maybrier, Hannah R
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Delirium is a common, serious postoperative complication. For clinical studies to generate valid findings, delirium assessments must be standardised and administered accurately by independent researchers. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a widely used delirium assessment tool. The objective was to determine whether implementing a standardised CAM training protocol for researchers at multiple international sites yields reliable inter-rater assessment and accurate delirium diagnosis. METHODS: Patients consented to video recordings of CAM delirium assessments for research purposes. Raters underwent structured training in CAM administration. Training entailed didactic education, role-playing with intensive feedback, apprenticeship with experienced researchers and group discussions of complex cases. Raters independently viewed and scored nine video-recorded CAM interviews. Inter-rater reliability was determined using Fleiss kappa. Accuracy was judged by comparing raters’ scores with those of an expert delirium researcher. RESULTS: Twenty-seven raters from eight international research centres completed the study and achieved almost perfect agreement for overall delirium diagnosis, kappa=0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.92). Agreement of the four core CAM features ranged from fair to substantial. The sensitivity and specificity for identifying delirium were 72% (95% CI 60% to 81%) and 99% (95% CI 96% to 100%), considering an expert rater’s scores as the reference standard (delirious, n=3; non-delirious, n=6). Delirium severity ratings were tightly clustered, with most scores within 5% of the median. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that, with appropriate training and ongoing scoring discussions, researchers at multiple sites can reliably detect delirium in postsurgical patients. These results support the premise that methodologically rigorous multi-centre studies can yield standardised and accurate determinations of delirium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62526432018-12-11 Reliability and accuracy of delirium assessments among investigators at multiple international centres Maybrier, Hannah R Mickle, Angela M Escallier, Krisztina E Lin, Nan Schmitt, Eva M Upadhyayula, Ravi T Wildes, Troy S Mashour, George A Palihnich, Kerry Inouye, Sharon K Avidan, Michael Simon BMJ Open Research Methods INTRODUCTION: Delirium is a common, serious postoperative complication. For clinical studies to generate valid findings, delirium assessments must be standardised and administered accurately by independent researchers. The Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) is a widely used delirium assessment tool. The objective was to determine whether implementing a standardised CAM training protocol for researchers at multiple international sites yields reliable inter-rater assessment and accurate delirium diagnosis. METHODS: Patients consented to video recordings of CAM delirium assessments for research purposes. Raters underwent structured training in CAM administration. Training entailed didactic education, role-playing with intensive feedback, apprenticeship with experienced researchers and group discussions of complex cases. Raters independently viewed and scored nine video-recorded CAM interviews. Inter-rater reliability was determined using Fleiss kappa. Accuracy was judged by comparing raters’ scores with those of an expert delirium researcher. RESULTS: Twenty-seven raters from eight international research centres completed the study and achieved almost perfect agreement for overall delirium diagnosis, kappa=0.88 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.92). Agreement of the four core CAM features ranged from fair to substantial. The sensitivity and specificity for identifying delirium were 72% (95% CI 60% to 81%) and 99% (95% CI 96% to 100%), considering an expert rater’s scores as the reference standard (delirious, n=3; non-delirious, n=6). Delirium severity ratings were tightly clustered, with most scores within 5% of the median. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that, with appropriate training and ongoing scoring discussions, researchers at multiple sites can reliably detect delirium in postsurgical patients. These results support the premise that methodologically rigorous multi-centre studies can yield standardised and accurate determinations of delirium. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6252643/ /pubmed/30467132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023137 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Methods
Maybrier, Hannah R
Mickle, Angela M
Escallier, Krisztina E
Lin, Nan
Schmitt, Eva M
Upadhyayula, Ravi T
Wildes, Troy S
Mashour, George A
Palihnich, Kerry
Inouye, Sharon K
Avidan, Michael Simon
Reliability and accuracy of delirium assessments among investigators at multiple international centres
title Reliability and accuracy of delirium assessments among investigators at multiple international centres
title_full Reliability and accuracy of delirium assessments among investigators at multiple international centres
title_fullStr Reliability and accuracy of delirium assessments among investigators at multiple international centres
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and accuracy of delirium assessments among investigators at multiple international centres
title_short Reliability and accuracy of delirium assessments among investigators at multiple international centres
title_sort reliability and accuracy of delirium assessments among investigators at multiple international centres
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30467132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023137
work_keys_str_mv AT maybrierhannahr reliabilityandaccuracyofdeliriumassessmentsamonginvestigatorsatmultipleinternationalcentres
AT mickleangelam reliabilityandaccuracyofdeliriumassessmentsamonginvestigatorsatmultipleinternationalcentres
AT escallierkrisztinae reliabilityandaccuracyofdeliriumassessmentsamonginvestigatorsatmultipleinternationalcentres
AT linnan reliabilityandaccuracyofdeliriumassessmentsamonginvestigatorsatmultipleinternationalcentres
AT schmittevam reliabilityandaccuracyofdeliriumassessmentsamonginvestigatorsatmultipleinternationalcentres
AT upadhyayularavit reliabilityandaccuracyofdeliriumassessmentsamonginvestigatorsatmultipleinternationalcentres
AT wildestroys reliabilityandaccuracyofdeliriumassessmentsamonginvestigatorsatmultipleinternationalcentres
AT mashourgeorgea reliabilityandaccuracyofdeliriumassessmentsamonginvestigatorsatmultipleinternationalcentres
AT palihnichkerry reliabilityandaccuracyofdeliriumassessmentsamonginvestigatorsatmultipleinternationalcentres
AT inouyesharonk reliabilityandaccuracyofdeliriumassessmentsamonginvestigatorsatmultipleinternationalcentres
AT avidanmichaelsimon reliabilityandaccuracyofdeliriumassessmentsamonginvestigatorsatmultipleinternationalcentres