Cargando…

Which treatment is most effective for patients with patellofemoral pain? A protocol for a living systematic review including network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) affects 1 in every 14 adults. Many treatments for PFP have been evaluated, but the comparative effectiveness of all available treatments has never been examined. Network meta-analysis is the only design to study the comparative effectiveness of all available t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winters, Marinus, Holden, Sinead, Vicenzino, Bill, Welton, Nicky J, Caldwell, Deborah M, Lura, Carolina Bryne, Weir, Adam, Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022920
_version_ 1783373310846828544
author Winters, Marinus
Holden, Sinead
Vicenzino, Bill
Welton, Nicky J
Caldwell, Deborah M
Lura, Carolina Bryne
Weir, Adam
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
author_facet Winters, Marinus
Holden, Sinead
Vicenzino, Bill
Welton, Nicky J
Caldwell, Deborah M
Lura, Carolina Bryne
Weir, Adam
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
author_sort Winters, Marinus
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) affects 1 in every 14 adults. Many treatments for PFP have been evaluated, but the comparative effectiveness of all available treatments has never been examined. Network meta-analysis is the only design to study the comparative effectiveness of all available treatments in one synthesis. This protocol describes the methods for a systematic review including network meta-analysis to assess which treatment is most likely to be effective for patients with PFP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome measures of this network meta-analysis are the global rating of change scale at 6–12 weeks, 13–52 weeks and >52 weeks. The secondary outcome measures are patient-rated pain scales at 6–12 weeks, 13–52 weeks and >52 weeks. Completed published and unpublished randomised controlled trials with full-text reports are eligible for inclusion. We will search Embase, PubMed (including MEDLINE), CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, OpenGrey, WorldCat, conference Proceedings and multiple trial registers for relevant reports. Two researchers will appraise the study eligibility and perform data extraction. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool V.2.0. Bayesian network meta-analyses will be constructed for global rating of change scale and patient-rated pain. Consistency between direct and indirect comparisons will be assessed. Between study variability will be explored, and a threshold analysis for the credibility of the network meta-analyses’ conclusions will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required, as this study will be based on published data. The study commenced at 1 February 2018, and its expected completion date is 15 January 2019. Full publication of the work will be sought in an international peer-reviewed journal, as well as translational articles to disseminate the work to clinical practitioners. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018079502.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62526442018-12-11 Which treatment is most effective for patients with patellofemoral pain? A protocol for a living systematic review including network meta-analysis Winters, Marinus Holden, Sinead Vicenzino, Bill Welton, Nicky J Caldwell, Deborah M Lura, Carolina Bryne Weir, Adam Rathleff, Michael Skovdal BMJ Open General practice / Family practice INTRODUCTION: Patellofemoral pain (PFP) affects 1 in every 14 adults. Many treatments for PFP have been evaluated, but the comparative effectiveness of all available treatments has never been examined. Network meta-analysis is the only design to study the comparative effectiveness of all available treatments in one synthesis. This protocol describes the methods for a systematic review including network meta-analysis to assess which treatment is most likely to be effective for patients with PFP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome measures of this network meta-analysis are the global rating of change scale at 6–12 weeks, 13–52 weeks and >52 weeks. The secondary outcome measures are patient-rated pain scales at 6–12 weeks, 13–52 weeks and >52 weeks. Completed published and unpublished randomised controlled trials with full-text reports are eligible for inclusion. We will search Embase, PubMed (including MEDLINE), CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, OpenGrey, WorldCat, conference Proceedings and multiple trial registers for relevant reports. Two researchers will appraise the study eligibility and perform data extraction. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool V.2.0. Bayesian network meta-analyses will be constructed for global rating of change scale and patient-rated pain. Consistency between direct and indirect comparisons will be assessed. Between study variability will be explored, and a threshold analysis for the credibility of the network meta-analyses’ conclusions will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required, as this study will be based on published data. The study commenced at 1 February 2018, and its expected completion date is 15 January 2019. Full publication of the work will be sought in an international peer-reviewed journal, as well as translational articles to disseminate the work to clinical practitioners. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018079502. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6252644/ /pubmed/30455387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022920 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Winters, Marinus
Holden, Sinead
Vicenzino, Bill
Welton, Nicky J
Caldwell, Deborah M
Lura, Carolina Bryne
Weir, Adam
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
Which treatment is most effective for patients with patellofemoral pain? A protocol for a living systematic review including network meta-analysis
title Which treatment is most effective for patients with patellofemoral pain? A protocol for a living systematic review including network meta-analysis
title_full Which treatment is most effective for patients with patellofemoral pain? A protocol for a living systematic review including network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Which treatment is most effective for patients with patellofemoral pain? A protocol for a living systematic review including network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Which treatment is most effective for patients with patellofemoral pain? A protocol for a living systematic review including network meta-analysis
title_short Which treatment is most effective for patients with patellofemoral pain? A protocol for a living systematic review including network meta-analysis
title_sort which treatment is most effective for patients with patellofemoral pain? a protocol for a living systematic review including network meta-analysis
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30455387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022920
work_keys_str_mv AT wintersmarinus whichtreatmentismosteffectiveforpatientswithpatellofemoralpainaprotocolforalivingsystematicreviewincludingnetworkmetaanalysis
AT holdensinead whichtreatmentismosteffectiveforpatientswithpatellofemoralpainaprotocolforalivingsystematicreviewincludingnetworkmetaanalysis
AT vicenzinobill whichtreatmentismosteffectiveforpatientswithpatellofemoralpainaprotocolforalivingsystematicreviewincludingnetworkmetaanalysis
AT weltonnickyj whichtreatmentismosteffectiveforpatientswithpatellofemoralpainaprotocolforalivingsystematicreviewincludingnetworkmetaanalysis
AT caldwelldeborahm whichtreatmentismosteffectiveforpatientswithpatellofemoralpainaprotocolforalivingsystematicreviewincludingnetworkmetaanalysis
AT luracarolinabryne whichtreatmentismosteffectiveforpatientswithpatellofemoralpainaprotocolforalivingsystematicreviewincludingnetworkmetaanalysis
AT weiradam whichtreatmentismosteffectiveforpatientswithpatellofemoralpainaprotocolforalivingsystematicreviewincludingnetworkmetaanalysis
AT rathleffmichaelskovdal whichtreatmentismosteffectiveforpatientswithpatellofemoralpainaprotocolforalivingsystematicreviewincludingnetworkmetaanalysis