Cargando…
Impact of a treatment escalation/limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms in patients during their last admission before in-hospital death, using the Structured Judgment Review Method
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of using a treatment escalation/limitation plan (TELP) on the frequency of harms in 300 patients who died following admission to hospital. DESIGN: A retrospective case note review of 300 unselected, consecutive deaths comprising: (1) patients with a TELP in addition...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024264 |
_version_ | 1783373320582856704 |
---|---|
author | Lightbody, Calvin J Campbell, Jonathan N Herbison, G Peter Osborne, Heather K Radley, Alice Taylor, D Robin |
author_facet | Lightbody, Calvin J Campbell, Jonathan N Herbison, G Peter Osborne, Heather K Radley, Alice Taylor, D Robin |
author_sort | Lightbody, Calvin J |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of using a treatment escalation/limitation plan (TELP) on the frequency of harms in 300 patients who died following admission to hospital. DESIGN: A retrospective case note review of 300 unselected, consecutive deaths comprising: (1) patients with a TELP in addition to a do-not-attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation order (DNACPR); (2) those with DNACPR only; and (3) those with neither. Patient deaths were classified retrospectively as ‘expected’ or ‘unexpected’ using the Gold Standard Framework Prognostic Indicator Guidance. SETTING: Medical, surgical and intensive care units of a district general hospital. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the between-group difference in rates of harms, non-beneficial interventions (NBIs) and clinical ‘problems’ identified using the Structured Judgement Review Method. RESULTS: 289 case records were evaluable. 155 had a TELP and DNACPR (54%); 113 had DNACPR only (39%); 21 had neither (7%). 247 deaths (86%) were ‘expected’. Among patients with ‘expected’ deaths and using the TELP/DNACPR as controls (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=1.00), the IRRs were: for harms, 2.99 (DNACPR only) and 4.00 (neither TELP nor DNACPR) (p<0.001 for both); for NBIs, the corresponding IRRs were 2.23 (DNACPR only) and 2.20 (neither) (p<0.001 and p<0.005, respectively); for ‘problems’, 2.30 (DNACPR only) and 2.76 (neither) (p<0.001 for both). The rates of harms, NBIs and ‘problems’ were significantly lower in the group with a TELP/DNACPR compared with ‘DNACPR only’ and ‘neither’: harms (per 1000 bed days) 17.1, 76.9 (p<0.001) and 197.8 (p<0.001) respectively; NBIs: 27.4, 92.1 (p<0.001) and 172.4 (p<0.001); and ‘problems’: 42.3, 146.2 (p<0.01) and 333.3 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a TELP was associated with a significant reduction in harms, NBIs and ‘problems’ in patients admitted acutely and who subsequently died, especially if they were likely to be in the last year of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6252685 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62526852018-12-11 Impact of a treatment escalation/limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms in patients during their last admission before in-hospital death, using the Structured Judgment Review Method Lightbody, Calvin J Campbell, Jonathan N Herbison, G Peter Osborne, Heather K Radley, Alice Taylor, D Robin BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of using a treatment escalation/limitation plan (TELP) on the frequency of harms in 300 patients who died following admission to hospital. DESIGN: A retrospective case note review of 300 unselected, consecutive deaths comprising: (1) patients with a TELP in addition to a do-not-attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation order (DNACPR); (2) those with DNACPR only; and (3) those with neither. Patient deaths were classified retrospectively as ‘expected’ or ‘unexpected’ using the Gold Standard Framework Prognostic Indicator Guidance. SETTING: Medical, surgical and intensive care units of a district general hospital. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the between-group difference in rates of harms, non-beneficial interventions (NBIs) and clinical ‘problems’ identified using the Structured Judgement Review Method. RESULTS: 289 case records were evaluable. 155 had a TELP and DNACPR (54%); 113 had DNACPR only (39%); 21 had neither (7%). 247 deaths (86%) were ‘expected’. Among patients with ‘expected’ deaths and using the TELP/DNACPR as controls (incidence rate ratio (IRR)=1.00), the IRRs were: for harms, 2.99 (DNACPR only) and 4.00 (neither TELP nor DNACPR) (p<0.001 for both); for NBIs, the corresponding IRRs were 2.23 (DNACPR only) and 2.20 (neither) (p<0.001 and p<0.005, respectively); for ‘problems’, 2.30 (DNACPR only) and 2.76 (neither) (p<0.001 for both). The rates of harms, NBIs and ‘problems’ were significantly lower in the group with a TELP/DNACPR compared with ‘DNACPR only’ and ‘neither’: harms (per 1000 bed days) 17.1, 76.9 (p<0.001) and 197.8 (p<0.001) respectively; NBIs: 27.4, 92.1 (p<0.001) and 172.4 (p<0.001); and ‘problems’: 42.3, 146.2 (p<0.01) and 333.3 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a TELP was associated with a significant reduction in harms, NBIs and ‘problems’ in patients admitted acutely and who subsequently died, especially if they were likely to be in the last year of life. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6252685/ /pubmed/30385448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024264 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Lightbody, Calvin J Campbell, Jonathan N Herbison, G Peter Osborne, Heather K Radley, Alice Taylor, D Robin Impact of a treatment escalation/limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms in patients during their last admission before in-hospital death, using the Structured Judgment Review Method |
title | Impact of a treatment escalation/limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms in patients during their last admission before in-hospital death, using the Structured Judgment Review Method |
title_full | Impact of a treatment escalation/limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms in patients during their last admission before in-hospital death, using the Structured Judgment Review Method |
title_fullStr | Impact of a treatment escalation/limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms in patients during their last admission before in-hospital death, using the Structured Judgment Review Method |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of a treatment escalation/limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms in patients during their last admission before in-hospital death, using the Structured Judgment Review Method |
title_short | Impact of a treatment escalation/limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms in patients during their last admission before in-hospital death, using the Structured Judgment Review Method |
title_sort | impact of a treatment escalation/limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms in patients during their last admission before in-hospital death, using the structured judgment review method |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024264 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lightbodycalvinj impactofatreatmentescalationlimitationplanonnonbeneficialinterventionsandharmsinpatientsduringtheirlastadmissionbeforeinhospitaldeathusingthestructuredjudgmentreviewmethod AT campbelljonathann impactofatreatmentescalationlimitationplanonnonbeneficialinterventionsandharmsinpatientsduringtheirlastadmissionbeforeinhospitaldeathusingthestructuredjudgmentreviewmethod AT herbisongpeter impactofatreatmentescalationlimitationplanonnonbeneficialinterventionsandharmsinpatientsduringtheirlastadmissionbeforeinhospitaldeathusingthestructuredjudgmentreviewmethod AT osborneheatherk impactofatreatmentescalationlimitationplanonnonbeneficialinterventionsandharmsinpatientsduringtheirlastadmissionbeforeinhospitaldeathusingthestructuredjudgmentreviewmethod AT radleyalice impactofatreatmentescalationlimitationplanonnonbeneficialinterventionsandharmsinpatientsduringtheirlastadmissionbeforeinhospitaldeathusingthestructuredjudgmentreviewmethod AT taylordrobin impactofatreatmentescalationlimitationplanonnonbeneficialinterventionsandharmsinpatientsduringtheirlastadmissionbeforeinhospitaldeathusingthestructuredjudgmentreviewmethod |