Cargando…
How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points
OBJECTIVE: If patient engagement is the new ‘blockbuster drug’ why are we not seeing spectacular effects? Studies have shown that activated patients have improved health outcomes, and patient engagement has become an integral component of value-based payment and delivery models, including accountabl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023068 |
_version_ | 1783373324836929536 |
---|---|
author | Mishra, Manish K Saunders, Catherine H Rodriguez, Hector P Shortell, Stephen M Fisher, Elliott Elwyn, Glyn |
author_facet | Mishra, Manish K Saunders, Catherine H Rodriguez, Hector P Shortell, Stephen M Fisher, Elliott Elwyn, Glyn |
author_sort | Mishra, Manish K |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: If patient engagement is the new ‘blockbuster drug’ why are we not seeing spectacular effects? Studies have shown that activated patients have improved health outcomes, and patient engagement has become an integral component of value-based payment and delivery models, including accountable care organisations (ACO). Yet the extent to which clinicians and managers at ACOs understand and reliably execute patient engagement in clinical encounters remains unknown. We assessed the use and understanding of patient engagement approaches among frontline clinicians and managers at ACO-affiliated practices. DESIGN: Qualitative study; 103 in-depth, semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty clinicians and eight managers were interviewed at two established ACOs. APPROACH: We interviewed healthcare professionals about their awareness, attitudes, understanding and experiences of implementing three key approaches to patient engagement and activation: 1) goal-setting, 2) motivational interviewing and 3) shared decision making. Of the 60 clinicians, 33 were interviewed twice leading to 93 clinician interviews. Of the 8 managers, 2 were interviewed twice leading to 10 manager interviews. We used a thematic analysis approach to the data. KEY RESULTS: Interviewees recognised the term ‘patient activation and engagement’ and had favourable attitudes about the utility of the associated skills. However, in-depth probing revealed that although interviewees reported that they used these patient activation and engagement approaches, they have limited understanding of these approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Without understanding the concept of patient activation and the associated approaches of shared decision making and motivational interviewing, effective implementation in routine care seems like a distant goal. Clinical teams in the ACO model would benefit from specificity defining key terms pertaining to the principles of patient activation and engagement. Measuring the degree of understanding with reward that are better-aligned for behaviour change will minimise the notion that these techniques are already being used and help fulfil the potential of patient-centred care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6252703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62527032018-12-11 How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points Mishra, Manish K Saunders, Catherine H Rodriguez, Hector P Shortell, Stephen M Fisher, Elliott Elwyn, Glyn BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine OBJECTIVE: If patient engagement is the new ‘blockbuster drug’ why are we not seeing spectacular effects? Studies have shown that activated patients have improved health outcomes, and patient engagement has become an integral component of value-based payment and delivery models, including accountable care organisations (ACO). Yet the extent to which clinicians and managers at ACOs understand and reliably execute patient engagement in clinical encounters remains unknown. We assessed the use and understanding of patient engagement approaches among frontline clinicians and managers at ACO-affiliated practices. DESIGN: Qualitative study; 103 in-depth, semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty clinicians and eight managers were interviewed at two established ACOs. APPROACH: We interviewed healthcare professionals about their awareness, attitudes, understanding and experiences of implementing three key approaches to patient engagement and activation: 1) goal-setting, 2) motivational interviewing and 3) shared decision making. Of the 60 clinicians, 33 were interviewed twice leading to 93 clinician interviews. Of the 8 managers, 2 were interviewed twice leading to 10 manager interviews. We used a thematic analysis approach to the data. KEY RESULTS: Interviewees recognised the term ‘patient activation and engagement’ and had favourable attitudes about the utility of the associated skills. However, in-depth probing revealed that although interviewees reported that they used these patient activation and engagement approaches, they have limited understanding of these approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Without understanding the concept of patient activation and the associated approaches of shared decision making and motivational interviewing, effective implementation in routine care seems like a distant goal. Clinical teams in the ACO model would benefit from specificity defining key terms pertaining to the principles of patient activation and engagement. Measuring the degree of understanding with reward that are better-aligned for behaviour change will minimise the notion that these techniques are already being used and help fulfil the potential of patient-centred care. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6252703/ /pubmed/30385443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023068 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Mishra, Manish K Saunders, Catherine H Rodriguez, Hector P Shortell, Stephen M Fisher, Elliott Elwyn, Glyn How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points |
title | How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points |
title_full | How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points |
title_fullStr | How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points |
title_full_unstemmed | How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points |
title_short | How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points |
title_sort | how do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? qualitative interviews across two time points |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mishramanishk howdohealthcareprofessionalsworkinginaccountablecareorganisationsunderstandpatientactivationandengagementqualitativeinterviewsacrosstwotimepoints AT saunderscatherineh howdohealthcareprofessionalsworkinginaccountablecareorganisationsunderstandpatientactivationandengagementqualitativeinterviewsacrosstwotimepoints AT rodriguezhectorp howdohealthcareprofessionalsworkinginaccountablecareorganisationsunderstandpatientactivationandengagementqualitativeinterviewsacrosstwotimepoints AT shortellstephenm howdohealthcareprofessionalsworkinginaccountablecareorganisationsunderstandpatientactivationandengagementqualitativeinterviewsacrosstwotimepoints AT fisherelliott howdohealthcareprofessionalsworkinginaccountablecareorganisationsunderstandpatientactivationandengagementqualitativeinterviewsacrosstwotimepoints AT elwynglyn howdohealthcareprofessionalsworkinginaccountablecareorganisationsunderstandpatientactivationandengagementqualitativeinterviewsacrosstwotimepoints |