Cargando…

2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are highly morbid, thus peri-procedural prevention interventions are employed to reduce them. However, little data exists evaluating the comparative effectiveness of these prevention interventions. Thus, the objective of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asundi, Archana, Stanislawski, Maggie, Mehta, Payal, Branch-Elliman, Westyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252720/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1782
_version_ 1783373328815226880
author Asundi, Archana
Stanislawski, Maggie
Mehta, Payal
Branch-Elliman, Westyn
author_facet Asundi, Archana
Stanislawski, Maggie
Mehta, Payal
Branch-Elliman, Westyn
author_sort Asundi, Archana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are highly morbid, thus peri-procedural prevention interventions are employed to reduce them. However, little data exists evaluating the comparative effectiveness of these prevention interventions. Thus, the objective of this study was to measure the association between infection prevention and antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies and procedure-related CIED infections among a national, multi-center cohort using a nested case–control design. METHODS: A selection of procedures entered into the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking-Electrophysiology cohort from FY 2008–2016 underwent manual review for presence of infection and for type of prevention strategy used. The primary outcome was 6-month incidence of CIED infection. Measures of association were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen CIED infections among 2,131 procedures were identified; 18 were superficial and 98 were deep. In a multivariable analysis, procedural factors associated with increased odds of procedure-related CIED infections included procedure complications (e.g., hematoma) and revisions (Table 1). Prevention factors associated with reduced risk included chlorhexidine (CHG) skin cleaning, pre-procedure prophylaxis with a β-lactam, and intra-procedure antibiotic washes. Infection prevention strategies that were not associated with risk reduction included: antibiotic mesh pockets, combination prophylaxis regimens (e.g., β-lactam plus vancomycin), and prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis lasting >24 hours post-procedure. CONCLUSION: Although the major driver of procedure-related CIED infections are procedural factors and complications, some infection prevention strategies are beneficial. These results should be used to inform infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship practices in the electrophysiology laboratory. DISCLOSURES: W. Branch-Elliman, Veterans’ Integrated Service Network Career Development Award: Investigator, Research grant. American Heart Association: Investigator, Research grant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62527202018-11-28 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program Asundi, Archana Stanislawski, Maggie Mehta, Payal Branch-Elliman, Westyn Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are highly morbid, thus peri-procedural prevention interventions are employed to reduce them. However, little data exists evaluating the comparative effectiveness of these prevention interventions. Thus, the objective of this study was to measure the association between infection prevention and antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies and procedure-related CIED infections among a national, multi-center cohort using a nested case–control design. METHODS: A selection of procedures entered into the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking-Electrophysiology cohort from FY 2008–2016 underwent manual review for presence of infection and for type of prevention strategy used. The primary outcome was 6-month incidence of CIED infection. Measures of association were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen CIED infections among 2,131 procedures were identified; 18 were superficial and 98 were deep. In a multivariable analysis, procedural factors associated with increased odds of procedure-related CIED infections included procedure complications (e.g., hematoma) and revisions (Table 1). Prevention factors associated with reduced risk included chlorhexidine (CHG) skin cleaning, pre-procedure prophylaxis with a β-lactam, and intra-procedure antibiotic washes. Infection prevention strategies that were not associated with risk reduction included: antibiotic mesh pockets, combination prophylaxis regimens (e.g., β-lactam plus vancomycin), and prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis lasting >24 hours post-procedure. CONCLUSION: Although the major driver of procedure-related CIED infections are procedural factors and complications, some infection prevention strategies are beneficial. These results should be used to inform infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship practices in the electrophysiology laboratory. DISCLOSURES: W. Branch-Elliman, Veterans’ Integrated Service Network Career Development Award: Investigator, Research grant. American Heart Association: Investigator, Research grant. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252720/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1782 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Asundi, Archana
Stanislawski, Maggie
Mehta, Payal
Branch-Elliman, Westyn
2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program
title 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program
title_full 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program
title_fullStr 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program
title_full_unstemmed 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program
title_short 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program
title_sort 2126. comparative effectiveness of infection prevention interventions for reducing procedure-related cardiac device infections: insights from the va cart program
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252720/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1782
work_keys_str_mv AT asundiarchana 2126comparativeeffectivenessofinfectionpreventioninterventionsforreducingprocedurerelatedcardiacdeviceinfectionsinsightsfromthevacartprogram
AT stanislawskimaggie 2126comparativeeffectivenessofinfectionpreventioninterventionsforreducingprocedurerelatedcardiacdeviceinfectionsinsightsfromthevacartprogram
AT mehtapayal 2126comparativeeffectivenessofinfectionpreventioninterventionsforreducingprocedurerelatedcardiacdeviceinfectionsinsightsfromthevacartprogram
AT branchellimanwestyn 2126comparativeeffectivenessofinfectionpreventioninterventionsforreducingprocedurerelatedcardiacdeviceinfectionsinsightsfromthevacartprogram