Cargando…
2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are highly morbid, thus peri-procedural prevention interventions are employed to reduce them. However, little data exists evaluating the comparative effectiveness of these prevention interventions. Thus, the objective of this...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252720/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1782 |
_version_ | 1783373328815226880 |
---|---|
author | Asundi, Archana Stanislawski, Maggie Mehta, Payal Branch-Elliman, Westyn |
author_facet | Asundi, Archana Stanislawski, Maggie Mehta, Payal Branch-Elliman, Westyn |
author_sort | Asundi, Archana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are highly morbid, thus peri-procedural prevention interventions are employed to reduce them. However, little data exists evaluating the comparative effectiveness of these prevention interventions. Thus, the objective of this study was to measure the association between infection prevention and antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies and procedure-related CIED infections among a national, multi-center cohort using a nested case–control design. METHODS: A selection of procedures entered into the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking-Electrophysiology cohort from FY 2008–2016 underwent manual review for presence of infection and for type of prevention strategy used. The primary outcome was 6-month incidence of CIED infection. Measures of association were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen CIED infections among 2,131 procedures were identified; 18 were superficial and 98 were deep. In a multivariable analysis, procedural factors associated with increased odds of procedure-related CIED infections included procedure complications (e.g., hematoma) and revisions (Table 1). Prevention factors associated with reduced risk included chlorhexidine (CHG) skin cleaning, pre-procedure prophylaxis with a β-lactam, and intra-procedure antibiotic washes. Infection prevention strategies that were not associated with risk reduction included: antibiotic mesh pockets, combination prophylaxis regimens (e.g., β-lactam plus vancomycin), and prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis lasting >24 hours post-procedure. CONCLUSION: Although the major driver of procedure-related CIED infections are procedural factors and complications, some infection prevention strategies are beneficial. These results should be used to inform infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship practices in the electrophysiology laboratory. DISCLOSURES: W. Branch-Elliman, Veterans’ Integrated Service Network Career Development Award: Investigator, Research grant. American Heart Association: Investigator, Research grant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6252720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62527202018-11-28 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program Asundi, Archana Stanislawski, Maggie Mehta, Payal Branch-Elliman, Westyn Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections are highly morbid, thus peri-procedural prevention interventions are employed to reduce them. However, little data exists evaluating the comparative effectiveness of these prevention interventions. Thus, the objective of this study was to measure the association between infection prevention and antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies and procedure-related CIED infections among a national, multi-center cohort using a nested case–control design. METHODS: A selection of procedures entered into the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking-Electrophysiology cohort from FY 2008–2016 underwent manual review for presence of infection and for type of prevention strategy used. The primary outcome was 6-month incidence of CIED infection. Measures of association were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen CIED infections among 2,131 procedures were identified; 18 were superficial and 98 were deep. In a multivariable analysis, procedural factors associated with increased odds of procedure-related CIED infections included procedure complications (e.g., hematoma) and revisions (Table 1). Prevention factors associated with reduced risk included chlorhexidine (CHG) skin cleaning, pre-procedure prophylaxis with a β-lactam, and intra-procedure antibiotic washes. Infection prevention strategies that were not associated with risk reduction included: antibiotic mesh pockets, combination prophylaxis regimens (e.g., β-lactam plus vancomycin), and prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis lasting >24 hours post-procedure. CONCLUSION: Although the major driver of procedure-related CIED infections are procedural factors and complications, some infection prevention strategies are beneficial. These results should be used to inform infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship practices in the electrophysiology laboratory. DISCLOSURES: W. Branch-Elliman, Veterans’ Integrated Service Network Career Development Award: Investigator, Research grant. American Heart Association: Investigator, Research grant. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252720/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1782 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Asundi, Archana Stanislawski, Maggie Mehta, Payal Branch-Elliman, Westyn 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program |
title | 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program |
title_full | 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program |
title_fullStr | 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program |
title_full_unstemmed | 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program |
title_short | 2126. Comparative Effectiveness of Infection Prevention Interventions for Reducing Procedure-Related Cardiac Device Infections: Insights from the VA CART Program |
title_sort | 2126. comparative effectiveness of infection prevention interventions for reducing procedure-related cardiac device infections: insights from the va cart program |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252720/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1782 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asundiarchana 2126comparativeeffectivenessofinfectionpreventioninterventionsforreducingprocedurerelatedcardiacdeviceinfectionsinsightsfromthevacartprogram AT stanislawskimaggie 2126comparativeeffectivenessofinfectionpreventioninterventionsforreducingprocedurerelatedcardiacdeviceinfectionsinsightsfromthevacartprogram AT mehtapayal 2126comparativeeffectivenessofinfectionpreventioninterventionsforreducingprocedurerelatedcardiacdeviceinfectionsinsightsfromthevacartprogram AT branchellimanwestyn 2126comparativeeffectivenessofinfectionpreventioninterventionsforreducingprocedurerelatedcardiacdeviceinfectionsinsightsfromthevacartprogram |