Cargando…

1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia

BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging nosocomial pathogen with intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics, making it potentially challenging to treat. Studies have demonstrated treatment failures and resistance development with monotherapy (MT); however, limited clinical data have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Megan, Coe, Kelci, ElBoghdadly, Zeinab, Wardlow, Lynn, Dela-Pena, Jennifer, Stevenson, Kurt, Reed, Erica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252743/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1313
_version_ 1783373334223781888
author Shah, Megan
Coe, Kelci
ElBoghdadly, Zeinab
Wardlow, Lynn
Dela-Pena, Jennifer
Stevenson, Kurt
Reed, Erica
author_facet Shah, Megan
Coe, Kelci
ElBoghdadly, Zeinab
Wardlow, Lynn
Dela-Pena, Jennifer
Stevenson, Kurt
Reed, Erica
author_sort Shah, Megan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging nosocomial pathogen with intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics, making it potentially challenging to treat. Studies have demonstrated treatment failures and resistance development with monotherapy (MT); however, limited clinical data have demonstrated improved outcomes with combination therapy (CT). The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes with CT vs. MT for S. maltophilia pneumonia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to OSUWMC between November 2011 and October 2017 with S. maltophilia pneumonia who received at least 48 hours of effective therapy. Data collected included baseline characteristics, APACHE II, immune status, and therapy received. The primary outcome was clinical response after seven days of effective therapy with CT vs. MT (i.e., improvement in signs and symptoms of infection, absence of fever for 24 hours, WBC normalization if immunocompetent, and negative blood cultures if concurrently bacteremic). Secondary outcomes included development of a nonsusceptible isolate; adverse drug events (ADEs); and 30-day microbiological cure, infection recurrence, and all-cause mortality. The Wilcoxon Rank-sum test, Pearson chi-squared test, and Fisher’s exact test were utilized as appropriate. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess clinical response while adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: There were 252 patients with S. maltophilia pneumonia who met inclusion criteria, of which 38 received CT and 214 received MT. There was no difference in clinical response with CT vs. MT (47.4% vs. 39.7%, P = 0.38), even after controlling for immune status, APACHE II, and polymicrobial pulmonary infection (adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.62–3.60). Thirty-day microbiological cure (P = 0.44), recurrence (P = 0.53), all-cause mortality (P = 0.07), and isolation of a nonsusceptible isolate during (P = 0.96) or after (P = 0.85) therapy were also similar when comparing CT vs. MT. The most commonly reported ADEs were hyperkalemia and GI intolerance with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and fluoroquinolones, respectively. CONCLUSION: CT had similar efficacy and development of nonsusceptibility compared with MT for S. maltophilia pneumonia. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62527432018-11-28 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia Shah, Megan Coe, Kelci ElBoghdadly, Zeinab Wardlow, Lynn Dela-Pena, Jennifer Stevenson, Kurt Reed, Erica Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging nosocomial pathogen with intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics, making it potentially challenging to treat. Studies have demonstrated treatment failures and resistance development with monotherapy (MT); however, limited clinical data have demonstrated improved outcomes with combination therapy (CT). The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes with CT vs. MT for S. maltophilia pneumonia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to OSUWMC between November 2011 and October 2017 with S. maltophilia pneumonia who received at least 48 hours of effective therapy. Data collected included baseline characteristics, APACHE II, immune status, and therapy received. The primary outcome was clinical response after seven days of effective therapy with CT vs. MT (i.e., improvement in signs and symptoms of infection, absence of fever for 24 hours, WBC normalization if immunocompetent, and negative blood cultures if concurrently bacteremic). Secondary outcomes included development of a nonsusceptible isolate; adverse drug events (ADEs); and 30-day microbiological cure, infection recurrence, and all-cause mortality. The Wilcoxon Rank-sum test, Pearson chi-squared test, and Fisher’s exact test were utilized as appropriate. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess clinical response while adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: There were 252 patients with S. maltophilia pneumonia who met inclusion criteria, of which 38 received CT and 214 received MT. There was no difference in clinical response with CT vs. MT (47.4% vs. 39.7%, P = 0.38), even after controlling for immune status, APACHE II, and polymicrobial pulmonary infection (adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.62–3.60). Thirty-day microbiological cure (P = 0.44), recurrence (P = 0.53), all-cause mortality (P = 0.07), and isolation of a nonsusceptible isolate during (P = 0.96) or after (P = 0.85) therapy were also similar when comparing CT vs. MT. The most commonly reported ADEs were hyperkalemia and GI intolerance with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and fluoroquinolones, respectively. CONCLUSION: CT had similar efficacy and development of nonsusceptibility compared with MT for S. maltophilia pneumonia. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252743/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1313 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Shah, Megan
Coe, Kelci
ElBoghdadly, Zeinab
Wardlow, Lynn
Dela-Pena, Jennifer
Stevenson, Kurt
Reed, Erica
1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia
title 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia
title_full 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia
title_fullStr 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia
title_short 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia
title_sort 1484. impact of combination vs. monotherapy on clinical outcomes associated with stenotrophomonas maltophilia pneumonia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252743/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1313
work_keys_str_mv AT shahmegan 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia
AT coekelci 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia
AT elboghdadlyzeinab 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia
AT wardlowlynn 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia
AT delapenajennifer 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia
AT stevensonkurt 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia
AT reederica 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia