Cargando…
1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia
BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging nosocomial pathogen with intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics, making it potentially challenging to treat. Studies have demonstrated treatment failures and resistance development with monotherapy (MT); however, limited clinical data have...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252743/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1313 |
_version_ | 1783373334223781888 |
---|---|
author | Shah, Megan Coe, Kelci ElBoghdadly, Zeinab Wardlow, Lynn Dela-Pena, Jennifer Stevenson, Kurt Reed, Erica |
author_facet | Shah, Megan Coe, Kelci ElBoghdadly, Zeinab Wardlow, Lynn Dela-Pena, Jennifer Stevenson, Kurt Reed, Erica |
author_sort | Shah, Megan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging nosocomial pathogen with intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics, making it potentially challenging to treat. Studies have demonstrated treatment failures and resistance development with monotherapy (MT); however, limited clinical data have demonstrated improved outcomes with combination therapy (CT). The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes with CT vs. MT for S. maltophilia pneumonia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to OSUWMC between November 2011 and October 2017 with S. maltophilia pneumonia who received at least 48 hours of effective therapy. Data collected included baseline characteristics, APACHE II, immune status, and therapy received. The primary outcome was clinical response after seven days of effective therapy with CT vs. MT (i.e., improvement in signs and symptoms of infection, absence of fever for 24 hours, WBC normalization if immunocompetent, and negative blood cultures if concurrently bacteremic). Secondary outcomes included development of a nonsusceptible isolate; adverse drug events (ADEs); and 30-day microbiological cure, infection recurrence, and all-cause mortality. The Wilcoxon Rank-sum test, Pearson chi-squared test, and Fisher’s exact test were utilized as appropriate. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess clinical response while adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: There were 252 patients with S. maltophilia pneumonia who met inclusion criteria, of which 38 received CT and 214 received MT. There was no difference in clinical response with CT vs. MT (47.4% vs. 39.7%, P = 0.38), even after controlling for immune status, APACHE II, and polymicrobial pulmonary infection (adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.62–3.60). Thirty-day microbiological cure (P = 0.44), recurrence (P = 0.53), all-cause mortality (P = 0.07), and isolation of a nonsusceptible isolate during (P = 0.96) or after (P = 0.85) therapy were also similar when comparing CT vs. MT. The most commonly reported ADEs were hyperkalemia and GI intolerance with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and fluoroquinolones, respectively. CONCLUSION: CT had similar efficacy and development of nonsusceptibility compared with MT for S. maltophilia pneumonia. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6252743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62527432018-11-28 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia Shah, Megan Coe, Kelci ElBoghdadly, Zeinab Wardlow, Lynn Dela-Pena, Jennifer Stevenson, Kurt Reed, Erica Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging nosocomial pathogen with intrinsic resistance to several antibiotics, making it potentially challenging to treat. Studies have demonstrated treatment failures and resistance development with monotherapy (MT); however, limited clinical data have demonstrated improved outcomes with combination therapy (CT). The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes with CT vs. MT for S. maltophilia pneumonia. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to OSUWMC between November 2011 and October 2017 with S. maltophilia pneumonia who received at least 48 hours of effective therapy. Data collected included baseline characteristics, APACHE II, immune status, and therapy received. The primary outcome was clinical response after seven days of effective therapy with CT vs. MT (i.e., improvement in signs and symptoms of infection, absence of fever for 24 hours, WBC normalization if immunocompetent, and negative blood cultures if concurrently bacteremic). Secondary outcomes included development of a nonsusceptible isolate; adverse drug events (ADEs); and 30-day microbiological cure, infection recurrence, and all-cause mortality. The Wilcoxon Rank-sum test, Pearson chi-squared test, and Fisher’s exact test were utilized as appropriate. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess clinical response while adjusting for confounding variables. RESULTS: There were 252 patients with S. maltophilia pneumonia who met inclusion criteria, of which 38 received CT and 214 received MT. There was no difference in clinical response with CT vs. MT (47.4% vs. 39.7%, P = 0.38), even after controlling for immune status, APACHE II, and polymicrobial pulmonary infection (adjusted OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.62–3.60). Thirty-day microbiological cure (P = 0.44), recurrence (P = 0.53), all-cause mortality (P = 0.07), and isolation of a nonsusceptible isolate during (P = 0.96) or after (P = 0.85) therapy were also similar when comparing CT vs. MT. The most commonly reported ADEs were hyperkalemia and GI intolerance with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and fluoroquinolones, respectively. CONCLUSION: CT had similar efficacy and development of nonsusceptibility compared with MT for S. maltophilia pneumonia. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252743/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1313 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Shah, Megan Coe, Kelci ElBoghdadly, Zeinab Wardlow, Lynn Dela-Pena, Jennifer Stevenson, Kurt Reed, Erica 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia |
title | 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia |
title_full | 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia |
title_fullStr | 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia |
title_full_unstemmed | 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia |
title_short | 1484. Impact of Combination Vs. Monotherapy on Clinical Outcomes Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia |
title_sort | 1484. impact of combination vs. monotherapy on clinical outcomes associated with stenotrophomonas maltophilia pneumonia |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252743/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shahmegan 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia AT coekelci 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia AT elboghdadlyzeinab 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia AT wardlowlynn 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia AT delapenajennifer 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia AT stevensonkurt 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia AT reederica 1484impactofcombinationvsmonotherapyonclinicaloutcomesassociatedwithstenotrophomonasmaltophiliapneumonia |