Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a care manager (CM) programme compared with care as usual (CAU) for treatment of depression at primary care centres (PCCs) from a healthcare as well as societal perspective. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: 23 PCCs in two Swedish regions....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024741 |
_version_ | 1783373341124460544 |
---|---|
author | Holst, Anna Ginter, Annika Björkelund, Cecilia Hange, Dominique Petersson, Eva-Lisa Svenningsson, Irene Westman, Jeanette André, Malin Wikberg, Carl Wallin, Lars Möller, Christina Svensson, Mikael |
author_facet | Holst, Anna Ginter, Annika Björkelund, Cecilia Hange, Dominique Petersson, Eva-Lisa Svenningsson, Irene Westman, Jeanette André, Malin Wikberg, Carl Wallin, Lars Möller, Christina Svensson, Mikael |
author_sort | Holst, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a care manager (CM) programme compared with care as usual (CAU) for treatment of depression at primary care centres (PCCs) from a healthcare as well as societal perspective. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: 23 PCCs in two Swedish regions. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with depression (n=342). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A cost-effectiveness analysis was applied on a cluster randomised trial at PCC level where patients with depression had 3 months of contact with a CM (11 intervention PCCs, n=163) or CAU (12 control PCCs, n=179), with follow-up 3 and 6 months. Effectiveness measures were based on the number of depression-free days (DFDs) calculated from the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results were expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: ∆Cost/∆QALY and ∆Cost/∆DFD. Sampling uncertainty was assessed based on non-parametric bootstrapping. RESULTS: Health benefits were higher in intervention group compared with CAU group: QALYs (0.357 vs 0.333, p<0.001) and DFD reduction of depressive symptom score (79.43 vs 60.14, p<0.001). The mean costs per patient for the 6-month period were €368 (healthcare perspective) and €6217 (societal perspective) for the intervention patients and €246 (healthcare perspective) and €7371 (societal perspective) for the control patients (n.s.). The cost per QALY gained was €6773 (healthcare perspective) and from a societal perspective the CM programme was dominant. DISCUSSION: The CM programme was associated with a gain in QALYs as well as in DFD, while also being cost saving compared with CAU from a societal perspective. This result is of high relevance for decision-makers on a national level, but it must be observed that a CM programme for depression implies increased costs at the primary care level. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02378272; Results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6252772 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62527722018-12-11 Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study Holst, Anna Ginter, Annika Björkelund, Cecilia Hange, Dominique Petersson, Eva-Lisa Svenningsson, Irene Westman, Jeanette André, Malin Wikberg, Carl Wallin, Lars Möller, Christina Svensson, Mikael BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a care manager (CM) programme compared with care as usual (CAU) for treatment of depression at primary care centres (PCCs) from a healthcare as well as societal perspective. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: 23 PCCs in two Swedish regions. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with depression (n=342). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A cost-effectiveness analysis was applied on a cluster randomised trial at PCC level where patients with depression had 3 months of contact with a CM (11 intervention PCCs, n=163) or CAU (12 control PCCs, n=179), with follow-up 3 and 6 months. Effectiveness measures were based on the number of depression-free days (DFDs) calculated from the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results were expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: ∆Cost/∆QALY and ∆Cost/∆DFD. Sampling uncertainty was assessed based on non-parametric bootstrapping. RESULTS: Health benefits were higher in intervention group compared with CAU group: QALYs (0.357 vs 0.333, p<0.001) and DFD reduction of depressive symptom score (79.43 vs 60.14, p<0.001). The mean costs per patient for the 6-month period were €368 (healthcare perspective) and €6217 (societal perspective) for the intervention patients and €246 (healthcare perspective) and €7371 (societal perspective) for the control patients (n.s.). The cost per QALY gained was €6773 (healthcare perspective) and from a societal perspective the CM programme was dominant. DISCUSSION: The CM programme was associated with a gain in QALYs as well as in DFD, while also being cost saving compared with CAU from a societal perspective. This result is of high relevance for decision-makers on a national level, but it must be observed that a CM programme for depression implies increased costs at the primary care level. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02378272; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6252772/ /pubmed/30420353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024741 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Holst, Anna Ginter, Annika Björkelund, Cecilia Hange, Dominique Petersson, Eva-Lisa Svenningsson, Irene Westman, Jeanette André, Malin Wikberg, Carl Wallin, Lars Möller, Christina Svensson, Mikael Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study |
title | Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252772/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024741 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holstanna costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT ginterannika costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT bjorkelundcecilia costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT hangedominique costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT peterssonevalisa costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT svenningssonirene costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT westmanjeanette costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT andremalin costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT wikbergcarl costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT wallinlars costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT mollerchristina costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy AT svenssonmikael costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy |