Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a care manager (CM) programme compared with care as usual (CAU) for treatment of depression at primary care centres (PCCs) from a healthcare as well as societal perspective. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: 23 PCCs in two Swedish regions....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holst, Anna, Ginter, Annika, Björkelund, Cecilia, Hange, Dominique, Petersson, Eva-Lisa, Svenningsson, Irene, Westman, Jeanette, André, Malin, Wikberg, Carl, Wallin, Lars, Möller, Christina, Svensson, Mikael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024741
_version_ 1783373341124460544
author Holst, Anna
Ginter, Annika
Björkelund, Cecilia
Hange, Dominique
Petersson, Eva-Lisa
Svenningsson, Irene
Westman, Jeanette
André, Malin
Wikberg, Carl
Wallin, Lars
Möller, Christina
Svensson, Mikael
author_facet Holst, Anna
Ginter, Annika
Björkelund, Cecilia
Hange, Dominique
Petersson, Eva-Lisa
Svenningsson, Irene
Westman, Jeanette
André, Malin
Wikberg, Carl
Wallin, Lars
Möller, Christina
Svensson, Mikael
author_sort Holst, Anna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a care manager (CM) programme compared with care as usual (CAU) for treatment of depression at primary care centres (PCCs) from a healthcare as well as societal perspective. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: 23 PCCs in two Swedish regions. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with depression (n=342). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A cost-effectiveness analysis was applied on a cluster randomised trial at PCC level where patients with depression had 3 months of contact with a CM (11 intervention PCCs, n=163) or CAU (12 control PCCs, n=179), with follow-up 3 and 6 months. Effectiveness measures were based on the number of depression-free days (DFDs) calculated from the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results were expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: ∆Cost/∆QALY and ∆Cost/∆DFD. Sampling uncertainty was assessed based on non-parametric bootstrapping. RESULTS: Health benefits were higher in intervention group compared with CAU group: QALYs (0.357 vs 0.333, p<0.001) and DFD reduction of depressive symptom score (79.43 vs 60.14, p<0.001). The mean costs per patient for the 6-month period were €368 (healthcare perspective) and €6217 (societal perspective) for the intervention patients and €246 (healthcare perspective) and €7371 (societal perspective) for the control patients (n.s.). The cost per QALY gained was €6773 (healthcare perspective) and from a societal perspective the CM programme was dominant. DISCUSSION: The CM programme was associated with a gain in QALYs as well as in DFD, while also being cost saving compared with CAU from a societal perspective. This result is of high relevance for decision-makers on a national level, but it must be observed that a CM programme for depression implies increased costs at the primary care level. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02378272; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62527722018-12-11 Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study Holst, Anna Ginter, Annika Björkelund, Cecilia Hange, Dominique Petersson, Eva-Lisa Svenningsson, Irene Westman, Jeanette André, Malin Wikberg, Carl Wallin, Lars Möller, Christina Svensson, Mikael BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a care manager (CM) programme compared with care as usual (CAU) for treatment of depression at primary care centres (PCCs) from a healthcare as well as societal perspective. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: 23 PCCs in two Swedish regions. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with depression (n=342). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A cost-effectiveness analysis was applied on a cluster randomised trial at PCC level where patients with depression had 3 months of contact with a CM (11 intervention PCCs, n=163) or CAU (12 control PCCs, n=179), with follow-up 3 and 6 months. Effectiveness measures were based on the number of depression-free days (DFDs) calculated from the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Results were expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: ∆Cost/∆QALY and ∆Cost/∆DFD. Sampling uncertainty was assessed based on non-parametric bootstrapping. RESULTS: Health benefits were higher in intervention group compared with CAU group: QALYs (0.357 vs 0.333, p<0.001) and DFD reduction of depressive symptom score (79.43 vs 60.14, p<0.001). The mean costs per patient for the 6-month period were €368 (healthcare perspective) and €6217 (societal perspective) for the intervention patients and €246 (healthcare perspective) and €7371 (societal perspective) for the control patients (n.s.). The cost per QALY gained was €6773 (healthcare perspective) and from a societal perspective the CM programme was dominant. DISCUSSION: The CM programme was associated with a gain in QALYs as well as in DFD, while also being cost saving compared with CAU from a societal perspective. This result is of high relevance for decision-makers on a national level, but it must be observed that a CM programme for depression implies increased costs at the primary care level. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02378272; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6252772/ /pubmed/30420353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024741 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Holst, Anna
Ginter, Annika
Björkelund, Cecilia
Hange, Dominique
Petersson, Eva-Lisa
Svenningsson, Irene
Westman, Jeanette
André, Malin
Wikberg, Carl
Wallin, Lars
Möller, Christina
Svensson, Mikael
Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study
title Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study
title_full Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study
title_short Cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study
title_sort cost-effectiveness of a care manager collaborative care programme for patients with depression in primary care: economic evaluation of a pragmatic randomised controlled study
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30420353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024741
work_keys_str_mv AT holstanna costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT ginterannika costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT bjorkelundcecilia costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT hangedominique costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT peterssonevalisa costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT svenningssonirene costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT westmanjeanette costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT andremalin costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT wikbergcarl costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT wallinlars costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT mollerchristina costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT svenssonmikael costeffectivenessofacaremanagercollaborativecareprogrammeforpatientswithdepressioninprimarycareeconomicevaluationofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledstudy