Cargando…

2024. Modeled Impact of Rapid Diagnostics on the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia at a Tertiary-Care VA Medical Center

BACKGROUND: Gram-negative pathogens take 24–72 hours to be identified (ID) and for antimicrobial susceptibilities (AS) to be obtained from blood cultures. Rapid molecular diagnostic tests (RDT) can shorten time to pathogen identification and antibiotic optimization. We compared our current processes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freshwater, Dustin, Stiefel, Usha, Perez, Federico, Akpoji, Ukwen, Hirsch, Amy, Burant, Christopher, Navas, Maria, Sims, Sharanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252790/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1680
_version_ 1783373345384824832
author Freshwater, Dustin
Stiefel, Usha
Perez, Federico
Akpoji, Ukwen
Hirsch, Amy
Burant, Christopher
Navas, Maria
Sims, Sharanie
author_facet Freshwater, Dustin
Stiefel, Usha
Perez, Federico
Akpoji, Ukwen
Hirsch, Amy
Burant, Christopher
Navas, Maria
Sims, Sharanie
author_sort Freshwater, Dustin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gram-negative pathogens take 24–72 hours to be identified (ID) and for antimicrobial susceptibilities (AS) to be obtained from blood cultures. Rapid molecular diagnostic tests (RDT) can shorten time to pathogen identification and antibiotic optimization. We compared our current processes with the predicted impact of an RDT system, to assist with an institutional decision to invest in RDT. The Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC Kit, which provides pathogen ID within 90 minutes of positive growth and AST within 7 hours, was selected as an example of a commercially available system for study purposes. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult patients between January 2016 and September 2017 with ≥1 positive blood culture with a Gram-negative organism detectable by the RDT system was conducted. Subject characteristics and organisms identified were recorded. Primary endpoints of the study were potential change in times to ID and AS with use of RDT. Standard laboratory procedures were used for ID and AS (pre-intervention period). The same subject population was used to calculate a theoretical time to ID and AS if RDT were used (modeled post-intervention). Patients were excluded if they expired or were discharged prior to culture results, on hemodialysis, were an outpatient at the time of + culture, or if time of ID or AS was not reported in the electronic record. RESULTS: A total of 156 subjects met inclusion criteria. The most common organisms isolated were E. coli (45%) and K. pneumoniae (22%). The pre-intervention mean time to ID and AS in the medical record were identical at 56 hours (using VITEK(®)). The mean times to effective (covering) and optimal (targeted/consolidated) therapy for the pre-intervention group were 8 and 75 hours, respectively. For the modeled post-intervention period, RDT could decrease time to ID by 54 hours (95% CI: 50.5–59.1, P < 0.001) and AS by 49 hours (95% CI: 45.1–53.5, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Time to optimal therapy of Gram-negative bloodstream infections at our facility was ~3 days (within a day of final organism ID and AS). This demonstrates excellent communication protocols between our microbiology and clinical departments, suggesting that our modeled benefit to RDT for organism ID and AS has good potential to be translated into clinical benefits. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62527902018-11-28 2024. Modeled Impact of Rapid Diagnostics on the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia at a Tertiary-Care VA Medical Center Freshwater, Dustin Stiefel, Usha Perez, Federico Akpoji, Ukwen Hirsch, Amy Burant, Christopher Navas, Maria Sims, Sharanie Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Gram-negative pathogens take 24–72 hours to be identified (ID) and for antimicrobial susceptibilities (AS) to be obtained from blood cultures. Rapid molecular diagnostic tests (RDT) can shorten time to pathogen identification and antibiotic optimization. We compared our current processes with the predicted impact of an RDT system, to assist with an institutional decision to invest in RDT. The Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC Kit, which provides pathogen ID within 90 minutes of positive growth and AST within 7 hours, was selected as an example of a commercially available system for study purposes. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult patients between January 2016 and September 2017 with ≥1 positive blood culture with a Gram-negative organism detectable by the RDT system was conducted. Subject characteristics and organisms identified were recorded. Primary endpoints of the study were potential change in times to ID and AS with use of RDT. Standard laboratory procedures were used for ID and AS (pre-intervention period). The same subject population was used to calculate a theoretical time to ID and AS if RDT were used (modeled post-intervention). Patients were excluded if they expired or were discharged prior to culture results, on hemodialysis, were an outpatient at the time of + culture, or if time of ID or AS was not reported in the electronic record. RESULTS: A total of 156 subjects met inclusion criteria. The most common organisms isolated were E. coli (45%) and K. pneumoniae (22%). The pre-intervention mean time to ID and AS in the medical record were identical at 56 hours (using VITEK(®)). The mean times to effective (covering) and optimal (targeted/consolidated) therapy for the pre-intervention group were 8 and 75 hours, respectively. For the modeled post-intervention period, RDT could decrease time to ID by 54 hours (95% CI: 50.5–59.1, P < 0.001) and AS by 49 hours (95% CI: 45.1–53.5, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Time to optimal therapy of Gram-negative bloodstream infections at our facility was ~3 days (within a day of final organism ID and AS). This demonstrates excellent communication protocols between our microbiology and clinical departments, suggesting that our modeled benefit to RDT for organism ID and AS has good potential to be translated into clinical benefits. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252790/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1680 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Freshwater, Dustin
Stiefel, Usha
Perez, Federico
Akpoji, Ukwen
Hirsch, Amy
Burant, Christopher
Navas, Maria
Sims, Sharanie
2024. Modeled Impact of Rapid Diagnostics on the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia at a Tertiary-Care VA Medical Center
title 2024. Modeled Impact of Rapid Diagnostics on the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia at a Tertiary-Care VA Medical Center
title_full 2024. Modeled Impact of Rapid Diagnostics on the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia at a Tertiary-Care VA Medical Center
title_fullStr 2024. Modeled Impact of Rapid Diagnostics on the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia at a Tertiary-Care VA Medical Center
title_full_unstemmed 2024. Modeled Impact of Rapid Diagnostics on the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia at a Tertiary-Care VA Medical Center
title_short 2024. Modeled Impact of Rapid Diagnostics on the Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia at a Tertiary-Care VA Medical Center
title_sort 2024. modeled impact of rapid diagnostics on the treatment of gram-negative bacteremia at a tertiary-care va medical center
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252790/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1680
work_keys_str_mv AT freshwaterdustin 2024modeledimpactofrapiddiagnosticsonthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiaatatertiarycarevamedicalcenter
AT stiefelusha 2024modeledimpactofrapiddiagnosticsonthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiaatatertiarycarevamedicalcenter
AT perezfederico 2024modeledimpactofrapiddiagnosticsonthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiaatatertiarycarevamedicalcenter
AT akpojiukwen 2024modeledimpactofrapiddiagnosticsonthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiaatatertiarycarevamedicalcenter
AT hirschamy 2024modeledimpactofrapiddiagnosticsonthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiaatatertiarycarevamedicalcenter
AT burantchristopher 2024modeledimpactofrapiddiagnosticsonthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiaatatertiarycarevamedicalcenter
AT navasmaria 2024modeledimpactofrapiddiagnosticsonthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiaatatertiarycarevamedicalcenter
AT simssharanie 2024modeledimpactofrapiddiagnosticsonthetreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiaatatertiarycarevamedicalcenter