Cargando…

1567. Predicting Mortality Among Immunocompromised Patients Who Present with Infection

BACKGROUND: Recent sepsis definitions for the general population include Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) ≥ 2 for patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU), and quick SOFA (qSOFA) ≥ 2 for non-ICU patients. The objective of this study was to validate the predictive value of SOFA and qS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henig, Oryan, Rao, Krishna, Albin, Owen, Putler, Rosemary, Kaul, Daniel, Kaye, Keith S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252879/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1395
_version_ 1783373366730686464
author Henig, Oryan
Rao, Krishna
Albin, Owen
Putler, Rosemary
Kaul, Daniel
Kaye, Keith S
author_facet Henig, Oryan
Rao, Krishna
Albin, Owen
Putler, Rosemary
Kaul, Daniel
Kaye, Keith S
author_sort Henig, Oryan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent sepsis definitions for the general population include Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) ≥ 2 for patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU), and quick SOFA (qSOFA) ≥ 2 for non-ICU patients. The objective of this study was to validate the predictive value of SOFA and qSOFA in immunocompromised patients. METHODS: Adult patients admitted between 2014 and 2017 with ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for hematologic malignancies or transplant diagnoses who had suspected infection were included. Index date of suspected infection was defined as the time when blood culture was obtained, followed by intravenous antibiotic therapy, or vice versa (based on the definition used in SEPSIS-3 study, Seymour et al.). SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS components within 1 day of the index date were extracted from the medical record. A baseline risk model of mortality was created including age, race, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index. Each score was added to the baseline mortality risk model as a dichotomous variable (SOFA ≥ 2, qSOFA ≥ 2, and SIRS ≥ 2). For each risk model, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was developed and the area under ROC (AUROC) was calculated. Sensitivities of SOFA ≥ 2, qSOFA ≥ 2, and SIRS ≥ 2 for predicting in-hospital mortality were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 2,917 patients with a mean age of 57.0 ± 15.7 were included; 57% were male and 84% white. The most common immunocompromising conditions were solid-organ transplantation (45%), lymphoma (24%), acute leukemia (17%) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (6%). Two hundred and seventeen patients died during index admission (7.4%). The sensitivities of SOFA ≥ 2, qSOFA ≥ 2 and SIRS ≥ 2 for predicting in-hospital mortality were 94.9, 64.1 and 91.7%, respectively (P < 0.001 for each score ≥2 compared with <2). In the mortality risk model, the AUROCs for qSOFA, SOFA and SIRS were 0.75, 0.70 and 0.71, respectively (Figure). The AUROC for qSOFA ≥2 was significantly higher than for SIRS ≥2 and SOFA ≥2 (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: qSOFA ≥2 was the strongest predictor of mortality in immunocompromised patients and may aid in risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Additional analyses are needed to evaluate alternative and potentially improved scoring systems for sepsis in immunocompromised populations. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62528792018-11-28 1567. Predicting Mortality Among Immunocompromised Patients Who Present with Infection Henig, Oryan Rao, Krishna Albin, Owen Putler, Rosemary Kaul, Daniel Kaye, Keith S Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Recent sepsis definitions for the general population include Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) ≥ 2 for patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU), and quick SOFA (qSOFA) ≥ 2 for non-ICU patients. The objective of this study was to validate the predictive value of SOFA and qSOFA in immunocompromised patients. METHODS: Adult patients admitted between 2014 and 2017 with ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for hematologic malignancies or transplant diagnoses who had suspected infection were included. Index date of suspected infection was defined as the time when blood culture was obtained, followed by intravenous antibiotic therapy, or vice versa (based on the definition used in SEPSIS-3 study, Seymour et al.). SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS components within 1 day of the index date were extracted from the medical record. A baseline risk model of mortality was created including age, race, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index. Each score was added to the baseline mortality risk model as a dichotomous variable (SOFA ≥ 2, qSOFA ≥ 2, and SIRS ≥ 2). For each risk model, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was developed and the area under ROC (AUROC) was calculated. Sensitivities of SOFA ≥ 2, qSOFA ≥ 2, and SIRS ≥ 2 for predicting in-hospital mortality were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 2,917 patients with a mean age of 57.0 ± 15.7 were included; 57% were male and 84% white. The most common immunocompromising conditions were solid-organ transplantation (45%), lymphoma (24%), acute leukemia (17%) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (6%). Two hundred and seventeen patients died during index admission (7.4%). The sensitivities of SOFA ≥ 2, qSOFA ≥ 2 and SIRS ≥ 2 for predicting in-hospital mortality were 94.9, 64.1 and 91.7%, respectively (P < 0.001 for each score ≥2 compared with <2). In the mortality risk model, the AUROCs for qSOFA, SOFA and SIRS were 0.75, 0.70 and 0.71, respectively (Figure). The AUROC for qSOFA ≥2 was significantly higher than for SIRS ≥2 and SOFA ≥2 (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: qSOFA ≥2 was the strongest predictor of mortality in immunocompromised patients and may aid in risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Additional analyses are needed to evaluate alternative and potentially improved scoring systems for sepsis in immunocompromised populations. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252879/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1395 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Henig, Oryan
Rao, Krishna
Albin, Owen
Putler, Rosemary
Kaul, Daniel
Kaye, Keith S
1567. Predicting Mortality Among Immunocompromised Patients Who Present with Infection
title 1567. Predicting Mortality Among Immunocompromised Patients Who Present with Infection
title_full 1567. Predicting Mortality Among Immunocompromised Patients Who Present with Infection
title_fullStr 1567. Predicting Mortality Among Immunocompromised Patients Who Present with Infection
title_full_unstemmed 1567. Predicting Mortality Among Immunocompromised Patients Who Present with Infection
title_short 1567. Predicting Mortality Among Immunocompromised Patients Who Present with Infection
title_sort 1567. predicting mortality among immunocompromised patients who present with infection
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252879/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1395
work_keys_str_mv AT henigoryan 1567predictingmortalityamongimmunocompromisedpatientswhopresentwithinfection
AT raokrishna 1567predictingmortalityamongimmunocompromisedpatientswhopresentwithinfection
AT albinowen 1567predictingmortalityamongimmunocompromisedpatientswhopresentwithinfection
AT putlerrosemary 1567predictingmortalityamongimmunocompromisedpatientswhopresentwithinfection
AT kauldaniel 1567predictingmortalityamongimmunocompromisedpatientswhopresentwithinfection
AT kayekeiths 1567predictingmortalityamongimmunocompromisedpatientswhopresentwithinfection