Cargando…
1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)?
BACKGROUND: CRE colonized patients that undergo HSCT have a higher incidence of CRE bacteremia, especially during the initial neutropenic period, with a high mortality rate. This situation is critical in countries highly endemic for CRE such as Colombia. It is necessary to find measures that decreas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252888/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1021 |
_version_ | 1783373368904384512 |
---|---|
author | Velez, Juan Diego Rosso, Fernando Cedano, Jorge Mora, Barbara Lucia Orrego, Marly Estacio, Mayra Beltran, Ivan Andres |
author_facet | Velez, Juan Diego Rosso, Fernando Cedano, Jorge Mora, Barbara Lucia Orrego, Marly Estacio, Mayra Beltran, Ivan Andres |
author_sort | Velez, Juan Diego |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: CRE colonized patients that undergo HSCT have a higher incidence of CRE bacteremia, especially during the initial neutropenic period, with a high mortality rate. This situation is critical in countries highly endemic for CRE such as Colombia. It is necessary to find measures that decrease the occurrence of this infection, permitting a safer transplant. Daily CHX bathing could be effective reducing this risk. METHODS: Since March 2014 in our hospital in Cali, Colombia, all adult patients admitted to the HSCT unit were peri-rectal screened for CRE colonization, and then CHX daily bathing (CHX 4% soap or CHX 2% pads) was used regardless of the screening results. Prospectively all type of microorganism bacteremia were recorded from 2014 to 2017. We compare bacteremia, and CRE bacteremia rates between CRE colonized vs. non-colonized patients. We compared the annual proportion of CRE bacteremia in this two groups. Nonparametrical statistic χ(2) for trend was used to compare the difference. RESULTS: We analyzed data collected from 155 patients from July 2014 to June 2017. There were 39.5% females, and the average age was 42 years, 60% were autologous, and 40% were allogeneic. The total of CRE colonized patients was 25/155 (16%), and the overall of bacteremia was 54/155 (34%). All type of microorganism bacteremia and CRE bacteremia were more frequent in CRE Colonized patients. (52% vs. 31% and 24% vs. 3,8%, RR: 6.24, 95% CI 2.06–18.8, P = 0.002). With the increase in compliance with CHX bathing, there was a decreasing trend in CRE bacteremia in the colonized patient, dropping from 50% during 2014, to 14% in 2017 (OR 0.167; P = 0.21). CONCLUSION: Daily CHX bathing in the CRE colonized patient reduce the incidence of CRE bacteremia in HSCT patients. We propose this intervention as a significant protective measure in CRE colonized hospitalized patients. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6252888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62528882018-11-28 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)? Velez, Juan Diego Rosso, Fernando Cedano, Jorge Mora, Barbara Lucia Orrego, Marly Estacio, Mayra Beltran, Ivan Andres Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: CRE colonized patients that undergo HSCT have a higher incidence of CRE bacteremia, especially during the initial neutropenic period, with a high mortality rate. This situation is critical in countries highly endemic for CRE such as Colombia. It is necessary to find measures that decrease the occurrence of this infection, permitting a safer transplant. Daily CHX bathing could be effective reducing this risk. METHODS: Since March 2014 in our hospital in Cali, Colombia, all adult patients admitted to the HSCT unit were peri-rectal screened for CRE colonization, and then CHX daily bathing (CHX 4% soap or CHX 2% pads) was used regardless of the screening results. Prospectively all type of microorganism bacteremia were recorded from 2014 to 2017. We compare bacteremia, and CRE bacteremia rates between CRE colonized vs. non-colonized patients. We compared the annual proportion of CRE bacteremia in this two groups. Nonparametrical statistic χ(2) for trend was used to compare the difference. RESULTS: We analyzed data collected from 155 patients from July 2014 to June 2017. There were 39.5% females, and the average age was 42 years, 60% were autologous, and 40% were allogeneic. The total of CRE colonized patients was 25/155 (16%), and the overall of bacteremia was 54/155 (34%). All type of microorganism bacteremia and CRE bacteremia were more frequent in CRE Colonized patients. (52% vs. 31% and 24% vs. 3,8%, RR: 6.24, 95% CI 2.06–18.8, P = 0.002). With the increase in compliance with CHX bathing, there was a decreasing trend in CRE bacteremia in the colonized patient, dropping from 50% during 2014, to 14% in 2017 (OR 0.167; P = 0.21). CONCLUSION: Daily CHX bathing in the CRE colonized patient reduce the incidence of CRE bacteremia in HSCT patients. We propose this intervention as a significant protective measure in CRE colonized hospitalized patients. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252888/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1021 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Velez, Juan Diego Rosso, Fernando Cedano, Jorge Mora, Barbara Lucia Orrego, Marly Estacio, Mayra Beltran, Ivan Andres 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)? |
title | 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)? |
title_full | 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)? |
title_fullStr | 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)? |
title_full_unstemmed | 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)? |
title_short | 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)? |
title_sort | 1188. could chlorehexidine (chx) bathing decrease the incidence of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteria (cre) bacteremia in previously colonized cre hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (hsct)? |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252888/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT velezjuandiego 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct AT rossofernando 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct AT cedanojorge 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct AT morabarbaralucia 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct AT orregomarly 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct AT estaciomayra 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct AT beltranivanandres 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct |