Cargando…

1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)?

BACKGROUND: CRE colonized patients that undergo HSCT have a higher incidence of CRE bacteremia, especially during the initial neutropenic period, with a high mortality rate. This situation is critical in countries highly endemic for CRE such as Colombia. It is necessary to find measures that decreas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velez, Juan Diego, Rosso, Fernando, Cedano, Jorge, Mora, Barbara Lucia, Orrego, Marly, Estacio, Mayra, Beltran, Ivan Andres
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252888/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1021
_version_ 1783373368904384512
author Velez, Juan Diego
Rosso, Fernando
Cedano, Jorge
Mora, Barbara Lucia
Orrego, Marly
Estacio, Mayra
Beltran, Ivan Andres
author_facet Velez, Juan Diego
Rosso, Fernando
Cedano, Jorge
Mora, Barbara Lucia
Orrego, Marly
Estacio, Mayra
Beltran, Ivan Andres
author_sort Velez, Juan Diego
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CRE colonized patients that undergo HSCT have a higher incidence of CRE bacteremia, especially during the initial neutropenic period, with a high mortality rate. This situation is critical in countries highly endemic for CRE such as Colombia. It is necessary to find measures that decrease the occurrence of this infection, permitting a safer transplant. Daily CHX bathing could be effective reducing this risk. METHODS: Since March 2014 in our hospital in Cali, Colombia, all adult patients admitted to the HSCT unit were peri-rectal screened for CRE colonization, and then CHX daily bathing (CHX 4% soap or CHX 2% pads) was used regardless of the screening results. Prospectively all type of microorganism bacteremia were recorded from 2014 to 2017. We compare bacteremia, and CRE bacteremia rates between CRE colonized vs. non-colonized patients. We compared the annual proportion of CRE bacteremia in this two groups. Nonparametrical statistic χ(2) for trend was used to compare the difference. RESULTS: We analyzed data collected from 155 patients from July 2014 to June 2017. There were 39.5% females, and the average age was 42 years, 60% were autologous, and 40% were allogeneic. The total of CRE colonized patients was 25/155 (16%), and the overall of bacteremia was 54/155 (34%). All type of microorganism bacteremia and CRE bacteremia were more frequent in CRE Colonized patients. (52% vs. 31% and 24% vs. 3,8%, RR: 6.24, 95% CI 2.06–18.8, P = 0.002). With the increase in compliance with CHX bathing, there was a decreasing trend in CRE bacteremia in the colonized patient, dropping from 50% during 2014, to 14% in 2017 (OR 0.167; P = 0.21). CONCLUSION: Daily CHX bathing in the CRE colonized patient reduce the incidence of CRE bacteremia in HSCT patients. We propose this intervention as a significant protective measure in CRE colonized hospitalized patients. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62528882018-11-28 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)? Velez, Juan Diego Rosso, Fernando Cedano, Jorge Mora, Barbara Lucia Orrego, Marly Estacio, Mayra Beltran, Ivan Andres Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: CRE colonized patients that undergo HSCT have a higher incidence of CRE bacteremia, especially during the initial neutropenic period, with a high mortality rate. This situation is critical in countries highly endemic for CRE such as Colombia. It is necessary to find measures that decrease the occurrence of this infection, permitting a safer transplant. Daily CHX bathing could be effective reducing this risk. METHODS: Since March 2014 in our hospital in Cali, Colombia, all adult patients admitted to the HSCT unit were peri-rectal screened for CRE colonization, and then CHX daily bathing (CHX 4% soap or CHX 2% pads) was used regardless of the screening results. Prospectively all type of microorganism bacteremia were recorded from 2014 to 2017. We compare bacteremia, and CRE bacteremia rates between CRE colonized vs. non-colonized patients. We compared the annual proportion of CRE bacteremia in this two groups. Nonparametrical statistic χ(2) for trend was used to compare the difference. RESULTS: We analyzed data collected from 155 patients from July 2014 to June 2017. There were 39.5% females, and the average age was 42 years, 60% were autologous, and 40% were allogeneic. The total of CRE colonized patients was 25/155 (16%), and the overall of bacteremia was 54/155 (34%). All type of microorganism bacteremia and CRE bacteremia were more frequent in CRE Colonized patients. (52% vs. 31% and 24% vs. 3,8%, RR: 6.24, 95% CI 2.06–18.8, P = 0.002). With the increase in compliance with CHX bathing, there was a decreasing trend in CRE bacteremia in the colonized patient, dropping from 50% during 2014, to 14% in 2017 (OR 0.167; P = 0.21). CONCLUSION: Daily CHX bathing in the CRE colonized patient reduce the incidence of CRE bacteremia in HSCT patients. We propose this intervention as a significant protective measure in CRE colonized hospitalized patients. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252888/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1021 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Velez, Juan Diego
Rosso, Fernando
Cedano, Jorge
Mora, Barbara Lucia
Orrego, Marly
Estacio, Mayra
Beltran, Ivan Andres
1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)?
title 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)?
title_full 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)?
title_fullStr 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)?
title_full_unstemmed 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)?
title_short 1188. Could Chlorehexidine (CHX) Bathing Decrease the Incidence of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) Bacteremia in Previously Colonized CRE Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (HSCT)?
title_sort 1188. could chlorehexidine (chx) bathing decrease the incidence of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteria (cre) bacteremia in previously colonized cre hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (hsct)?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252888/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1021
work_keys_str_mv AT velezjuandiego 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct
AT rossofernando 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct
AT cedanojorge 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct
AT morabarbaralucia 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct
AT orregomarly 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct
AT estaciomayra 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct
AT beltranivanandres 1188couldchlorehexidinechxbathingdecreasetheincidenceofcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriacrebacteremiainpreviouslycolonizedcrehematopoieticstemcelltransplantrecipientshsct