Cargando…

2559. Incidence and Clinical Impact of Discordant Genotypic and Phenotypic Categorization of Methicillin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-susceptible/methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA/MRSA) can be directly identified from positive blood culture bottles using molecular methods. This provides faster results than traditional phenotypic testing, but discrepancies between the two are occasionally fou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gulliver, Jessica, Jung-Hynes, Brittney, Chen, Derrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252899/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy209.167
_version_ 1783373371506950144
author Gulliver, Jessica
Jung-Hynes, Brittney
Chen, Derrick
author_facet Gulliver, Jessica
Jung-Hynes, Brittney
Chen, Derrick
author_sort Gulliver, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methicillin-susceptible/methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA/MRSA) can be directly identified from positive blood culture bottles using molecular methods. This provides faster results than traditional phenotypic testing, but discrepancies between the two are occasionally found. We sought to determine the incidence and clinical impact of such discrepancies. METHODS: Positive blood culture bottles are routinely tested in the hospital clinical laboratory for mecA via Xpert MRSA/SA BC (PCR), and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) via MicroScan PC33 is performed on recovered S. aureus isolates; discrepancies between PCR and AST are resolved by repeat and supplemental (Kirby-Bauer) testing. A retrospective review of medical and laboratory data from January 2015 to December 2017 was performed on all patients that had discordant PCR and AST results. RESULTS: Approximately 1,200 PCR assays were performed from January 2015 to December 2017, and there were 5 (0.4%) cases with discordant AST Results. Four cases were classified as MSSA by PCR but MRSA by AST, and 1 case was classified as MRSA by PCR but MSSA by AST. For the former group, antimicrobial therapy was changed in 2 patients to cover MRSA and 1 patient was readmitted, while the remaining 2 patients were already being treated for MRSA; for the latter case, this patient was treated for MRSA during the initial hospitalization, but was readmitted with disseminated MSSA and subsequently deceased. Based on genetic targets identified by PCR and cefoxitin and oxacillin AST, discrepancies were likely due to borderline oxacillin resistance (BORSA) (n = 1), presence of an SCCmec variant not detected by PCR (n = 1), or undetermined (n = 3). CONCLUSION: Rapid identification of MRSA bacteremia via PCR provides actionable information to direct empiric treatment. While highly accurate, PCR results are infrequently not corroborated by AST. This rare possibility should be considered when modifying therapy based on initial PCR results, and there should be close communication between the clinical team and laboratory for these challenging cases. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62528992018-11-28 2559. Incidence and Clinical Impact of Discordant Genotypic and Phenotypic Categorization of Methicillin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Gulliver, Jessica Jung-Hynes, Brittney Chen, Derrick Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Methicillin-susceptible/methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA/MRSA) can be directly identified from positive blood culture bottles using molecular methods. This provides faster results than traditional phenotypic testing, but discrepancies between the two are occasionally found. We sought to determine the incidence and clinical impact of such discrepancies. METHODS: Positive blood culture bottles are routinely tested in the hospital clinical laboratory for mecA via Xpert MRSA/SA BC (PCR), and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) via MicroScan PC33 is performed on recovered S. aureus isolates; discrepancies between PCR and AST are resolved by repeat and supplemental (Kirby-Bauer) testing. A retrospective review of medical and laboratory data from January 2015 to December 2017 was performed on all patients that had discordant PCR and AST results. RESULTS: Approximately 1,200 PCR assays were performed from January 2015 to December 2017, and there were 5 (0.4%) cases with discordant AST Results. Four cases were classified as MSSA by PCR but MRSA by AST, and 1 case was classified as MRSA by PCR but MSSA by AST. For the former group, antimicrobial therapy was changed in 2 patients to cover MRSA and 1 patient was readmitted, while the remaining 2 patients were already being treated for MRSA; for the latter case, this patient was treated for MRSA during the initial hospitalization, but was readmitted with disseminated MSSA and subsequently deceased. Based on genetic targets identified by PCR and cefoxitin and oxacillin AST, discrepancies were likely due to borderline oxacillin resistance (BORSA) (n = 1), presence of an SCCmec variant not detected by PCR (n = 1), or undetermined (n = 3). CONCLUSION: Rapid identification of MRSA bacteremia via PCR provides actionable information to direct empiric treatment. While highly accurate, PCR results are infrequently not corroborated by AST. This rare possibility should be considered when modifying therapy based on initial PCR results, and there should be close communication between the clinical team and laboratory for these challenging cases. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252899/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy209.167 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Gulliver, Jessica
Jung-Hynes, Brittney
Chen, Derrick
2559. Incidence and Clinical Impact of Discordant Genotypic and Phenotypic Categorization of Methicillin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
title 2559. Incidence and Clinical Impact of Discordant Genotypic and Phenotypic Categorization of Methicillin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
title_full 2559. Incidence and Clinical Impact of Discordant Genotypic and Phenotypic Categorization of Methicillin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
title_fullStr 2559. Incidence and Clinical Impact of Discordant Genotypic and Phenotypic Categorization of Methicillin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 2559. Incidence and Clinical Impact of Discordant Genotypic and Phenotypic Categorization of Methicillin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
title_short 2559. Incidence and Clinical Impact of Discordant Genotypic and Phenotypic Categorization of Methicillin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
title_sort 2559. incidence and clinical impact of discordant genotypic and phenotypic categorization of methicillin susceptibility in staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252899/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy209.167
work_keys_str_mv AT gulliverjessica 2559incidenceandclinicalimpactofdiscordantgenotypicandphenotypiccategorizationofmethicillinsusceptibilityinstaphylococcusaureusbacteremia
AT junghynesbrittney 2559incidenceandclinicalimpactofdiscordantgenotypicandphenotypiccategorizationofmethicillinsusceptibilityinstaphylococcusaureusbacteremia
AT chenderrick 2559incidenceandclinicalimpactofdiscordantgenotypicandphenotypiccategorizationofmethicillinsusceptibilityinstaphylococcusaureusbacteremia