Cargando…

1216. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Allergy Testing in Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: β-Lactams remain the gold standard for treatment of MSSA bacteremia due to superior outcomes compared with vancomycin. Approximately nine in 10 patients receiving penicillin skin testing (PST) will be de-labeled of a penicillin allergy and able to receive a β-lactam antibiotic. The study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meninger, Stephen, Heil, Emily, Mattingly II, T Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252935/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1049
_version_ 1783373379954278400
author Meninger, Stephen
Heil, Emily
Mattingly II, T Joseph
author_facet Meninger, Stephen
Heil, Emily
Mattingly II, T Joseph
author_sort Meninger, Stephen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: β-Lactams remain the gold standard for treatment of MSSA bacteremia due to superior outcomes compared with vancomycin. Approximately nine in 10 patients receiving penicillin skin testing (PST) will be de-labeled of a penicillin allergy and able to receive a β-lactam antibiotic. The study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of penicillin allergy confirmation during acute care admission for methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia through a PST service. METHODS: A decision tree analysis was used to compare a PST intervention in patients with a registeredpenicillin allergy during an inpatient admission for MSSA bacteremia vs. usual care (No PST). The model was created from the health sector perspective with a 1-year time horizon. Patients with a penicillin allergy label were expected to receive vancomycin while patients with no penicillin allergy were expected to receive cefazolin. Potential inpatient, outpatient, and adverse reaction costs were considered in all arms of the model. The effects were measured in quality adjusted life years (QALY) and were calculated for patients who were cured, hospitalized, experienced severe adverse events, or died from MSSA infection. RESULTS: Patients who received PST services had a mean yearly cost of $12,802, mean quality adjusted life years (QALY) of 0.70, and mean cost/QALY of $18,311. The comparator group not receiving PST services had a mean yearly cost of $12,264, mean quality adjusted life years (QALY) of 0.64, and mean cost/QALY of $19,192. The model produced a final base case ICERof $8,966/QALY for receiving a PST during a hospital admission for the treatment of methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. CONCLUSION: Penicillin allergy confirmation through PST services was cost-effective for patients with a reported penicillin allergy admitted for MSSA bacteremia. Additional research to determine potential benefits of PST services beyond one year could further improve the cost-effectiveness of this intervention. DISCLOSURES: S. Meninger, ALK-Abelló: Grant Investigator, Research grant. E. Heil, ALK-Abelló: Grant Investigator, Research grant. T. J. Mattingly II, ALK-Abelló: Grant Investigator, Research grant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62529352018-11-28 1216. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Allergy Testing in Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) Bacteremia Meninger, Stephen Heil, Emily Mattingly II, T Joseph Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: β-Lactams remain the gold standard for treatment of MSSA bacteremia due to superior outcomes compared with vancomycin. Approximately nine in 10 patients receiving penicillin skin testing (PST) will be de-labeled of a penicillin allergy and able to receive a β-lactam antibiotic. The study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of penicillin allergy confirmation during acute care admission for methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia through a PST service. METHODS: A decision tree analysis was used to compare a PST intervention in patients with a registeredpenicillin allergy during an inpatient admission for MSSA bacteremia vs. usual care (No PST). The model was created from the health sector perspective with a 1-year time horizon. Patients with a penicillin allergy label were expected to receive vancomycin while patients with no penicillin allergy were expected to receive cefazolin. Potential inpatient, outpatient, and adverse reaction costs were considered in all arms of the model. The effects were measured in quality adjusted life years (QALY) and were calculated for patients who were cured, hospitalized, experienced severe adverse events, or died from MSSA infection. RESULTS: Patients who received PST services had a mean yearly cost of $12,802, mean quality adjusted life years (QALY) of 0.70, and mean cost/QALY of $18,311. The comparator group not receiving PST services had a mean yearly cost of $12,264, mean quality adjusted life years (QALY) of 0.64, and mean cost/QALY of $19,192. The model produced a final base case ICERof $8,966/QALY for receiving a PST during a hospital admission for the treatment of methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. CONCLUSION: Penicillin allergy confirmation through PST services was cost-effective for patients with a reported penicillin allergy admitted for MSSA bacteremia. Additional research to determine potential benefits of PST services beyond one year could further improve the cost-effectiveness of this intervention. DISCLOSURES: S. Meninger, ALK-Abelló: Grant Investigator, Research grant. E. Heil, ALK-Abelló: Grant Investigator, Research grant. T. J. Mattingly II, ALK-Abelló: Grant Investigator, Research grant. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252935/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1049 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Meninger, Stephen
Heil, Emily
Mattingly II, T Joseph
1216. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Allergy Testing in Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) Bacteremia
title 1216. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Allergy Testing in Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) Bacteremia
title_full 1216. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Allergy Testing in Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) Bacteremia
title_fullStr 1216. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Allergy Testing in Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 1216. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Allergy Testing in Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) Bacteremia
title_short 1216. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Allergy Testing in Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) Bacteremia
title_sort 1216. cost-effectiveness of penicillin skin allergy testing in methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (mssa) bacteremia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252935/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1049
work_keys_str_mv AT meningerstephen 1216costeffectivenessofpenicillinskinallergytestinginmethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusmssabacteremia
AT heilemily 1216costeffectivenessofpenicillinskinallergytestinginmethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusmssabacteremia
AT mattinglyiitjoseph 1216costeffectivenessofpenicillinskinallergytestinginmethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusmssabacteremia