Cargando…

931. Telemedicine for the Treatment of Hepatitis C: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C (HCV) is a curable cause of liver disease, typically treated by specialists. Access to specialists is limited in rural areas. Telemedicine between generalists and specialists could yield outcomes comparable with care provided by specialists in face-to-face (FTF) encounters. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Gijsel, David, Kruger, Blake, Hakim, Dema, Moore, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252962/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy209.071
_version_ 1783373386377854976
author De Gijsel, David
Kruger, Blake
Hakim, Dema
Moore, Sarah
author_facet De Gijsel, David
Kruger, Blake
Hakim, Dema
Moore, Sarah
author_sort De Gijsel, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C (HCV) is a curable cause of liver disease, typically treated by specialists. Access to specialists is limited in rural areas. Telemedicine between generalists and specialists could yield outcomes comparable with care provided by specialists in face-to-face (FTF) encounters. To assess the effectiveness of HCV treatment through telemedicine compared with usual care, as measured by sustained virologic response (SVR). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Excerpta Medica DataBASE from inception to March 2018. We included Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing telemedicine in rural settings to FTF encounters with specialists in treating HCV. Studies reported cure as measured by SVR. We did not apply any exclusion criteria. At least 2 independent researchers used PRISMA guidelines to extract data. We used a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Collaboration Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias to assess observational studies and RCTs. We used a random-effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR). The primary outcome was clinical cure. Cure was defined as SVR at 12 weeks after completion of treatment. RESULTS: Of 1,211 potentially eligible studies, 10 studies, representing 43,117 subjects, met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed no difference in the odds of achieving SVR when comparing telemedicine to FTF specialist care (OR 1.01 [95% CI 0.78–1.30]). This result was robust across sensitivity analyses, including restriction to patients who completed treatment (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.43–1.43]), exclusion of outliers, and exclusion of abstracts. There was significant heterogeneity [P = 0.003, I(2) = 64]. CONCLUSION: In rural areas with limited access to specialists, care provided by telemedicine-supported generalists is as effective as FTF specialist care in achieving cure of HCV. Telemedicine is a viable option to expand access to HCV care in rural settings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6252962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62529622018-11-28 931. Telemedicine for the Treatment of Hepatitis C: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis De Gijsel, David Kruger, Blake Hakim, Dema Moore, Sarah Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C (HCV) is a curable cause of liver disease, typically treated by specialists. Access to specialists is limited in rural areas. Telemedicine between generalists and specialists could yield outcomes comparable with care provided by specialists in face-to-face (FTF) encounters. To assess the effectiveness of HCV treatment through telemedicine compared with usual care, as measured by sustained virologic response (SVR). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Excerpta Medica DataBASE from inception to March 2018. We included Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing telemedicine in rural settings to FTF encounters with specialists in treating HCV. Studies reported cure as measured by SVR. We did not apply any exclusion criteria. At least 2 independent researchers used PRISMA guidelines to extract data. We used a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Collaboration Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias to assess observational studies and RCTs. We used a random-effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR). The primary outcome was clinical cure. Cure was defined as SVR at 12 weeks after completion of treatment. RESULTS: Of 1,211 potentially eligible studies, 10 studies, representing 43,117 subjects, met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed no difference in the odds of achieving SVR when comparing telemedicine to FTF specialist care (OR 1.01 [95% CI 0.78–1.30]). This result was robust across sensitivity analyses, including restriction to patients who completed treatment (OR 0.78 [95% CI 0.43–1.43]), exclusion of outliers, and exclusion of abstracts. There was significant heterogeneity [P = 0.003, I(2) = 64]. CONCLUSION: In rural areas with limited access to specialists, care provided by telemedicine-supported generalists is as effective as FTF specialist care in achieving cure of HCV. Telemedicine is a viable option to expand access to HCV care in rural settings. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6252962/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy209.071 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
De Gijsel, David
Kruger, Blake
Hakim, Dema
Moore, Sarah
931. Telemedicine for the Treatment of Hepatitis C: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title 931. Telemedicine for the Treatment of Hepatitis C: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full 931. Telemedicine for the Treatment of Hepatitis C: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr 931. Telemedicine for the Treatment of Hepatitis C: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed 931. Telemedicine for the Treatment of Hepatitis C: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short 931. Telemedicine for the Treatment of Hepatitis C: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort 931. telemedicine for the treatment of hepatitis c: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6252962/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy209.071
work_keys_str_mv AT degijseldavid 931telemedicineforthetreatmentofhepatitiscasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT krugerblake 931telemedicineforthetreatmentofhepatitiscasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hakimdema 931telemedicineforthetreatmentofhepatitiscasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mooresarah 931telemedicineforthetreatmentofhepatitiscasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis