Cargando…

1729. Effect of Glove Disinfection on Bacterial Contamination of Healthcare Worker Hands

BACKGROUND: Disinfection of gloves and gowns was recommended to decrease healthcare worker (HCW) self-contamination during doffing of gloves and gowns in the Ebola epidemic. To understand the potential role of this practice in preventing bacterial transmission, we examined the effect of disinfectant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Gwen, Kpadeh, Zegbeh Z, Alserehi, Haleema, Morgan, Daniel, Harris, Anthony D, Johnson, J Kristie, Leekha, Surbhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253001/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy209.135
_version_ 1783373395505709056
author Robinson, Gwen
Kpadeh, Zegbeh Z
Alserehi, Haleema
Morgan, Daniel
Harris, Anthony D
Johnson, J Kristie
Leekha, Surbhi
author_facet Robinson, Gwen
Kpadeh, Zegbeh Z
Alserehi, Haleema
Morgan, Daniel
Harris, Anthony D
Johnson, J Kristie
Leekha, Surbhi
author_sort Robinson, Gwen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Disinfection of gloves and gowns was recommended to decrease healthcare worker (HCW) self-contamination during doffing of gloves and gowns in the Ebola epidemic. To understand the potential role of this practice in preventing bacterial transmission, we examined the effect of disinfectants on bacterial contamination of HCW hands following glove removal. METHODS: A laboratory simulation study was conducted using methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and antibiotic-sensitive Klebsiella pneumoniae among volunteer HCWs (n = 10 per organism). For each experiment, the volunteer donned 2 pairs of gloves with the “under glove” simulating HCW hands and “top glove” simulating actual glove use in the clinical setting. The top-glove was inoculated with 10(8) CFU bacteria for each step. Top gloves were sampled directly after inoculation (Arm A), and after disinfection with alcohol gel, bleach wipes, and quaternary ammonium (quat) wipes, in separate steps (Arm B). Under gloves were sampled after top glove removal without disinfection (Arm C), and top glove removal post disinfection (Arm D). Quantitative bacterial load reduction was compared for glove use (Arm C − Arm A), and for disinfectant use in addition to glove use (Arm D − Arm C). Qualitative detection of any bacterial load (present/absent) on under glove in the setting of disinfection prior to top glove removal was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 10(8) CFU inoculated, the median recovery was 1.2 × 10(4) CFU (both bacteria combined). After glove removal (no disinfection), the median recovery from the under glove was 2.7 × 10(2) CFU, for a reduction of 98% (1.6 log) in bacterial load. After top glove disinfection and removal, the median bacterial recovery from the under glove was 1.4 × 10(2), 0, and 0 CFU for alcohol, quat, and bleach (47% or 0.3 log reduction for alcohol; 99% or 2 log reduction for quat and bleach) (Figure 1). Regardless of quantity, bacteria were recovered from under gloves even after top glove disinfection in 70%, 40%, and 35% cases for alcohol, quat, and bleach, respectively (Figure 2). CONCLUSION: Glove disinfection prior to glove removal is effective at reducing bacterial contamination of HCW hands. However, despite disinfection, some level of hand contamination occurs frequently. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: J. K. Johnson, Q-Linea: Investigator, Research grant. Applied Biocode: Investigator, Research grant
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62530012018-11-28 1729. Effect of Glove Disinfection on Bacterial Contamination of Healthcare Worker Hands Robinson, Gwen Kpadeh, Zegbeh Z Alserehi, Haleema Morgan, Daniel Harris, Anthony D Johnson, J Kristie Leekha, Surbhi Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Disinfection of gloves and gowns was recommended to decrease healthcare worker (HCW) self-contamination during doffing of gloves and gowns in the Ebola epidemic. To understand the potential role of this practice in preventing bacterial transmission, we examined the effect of disinfectants on bacterial contamination of HCW hands following glove removal. METHODS: A laboratory simulation study was conducted using methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and antibiotic-sensitive Klebsiella pneumoniae among volunteer HCWs (n = 10 per organism). For each experiment, the volunteer donned 2 pairs of gloves with the “under glove” simulating HCW hands and “top glove” simulating actual glove use in the clinical setting. The top-glove was inoculated with 10(8) CFU bacteria for each step. Top gloves were sampled directly after inoculation (Arm A), and after disinfection with alcohol gel, bleach wipes, and quaternary ammonium (quat) wipes, in separate steps (Arm B). Under gloves were sampled after top glove removal without disinfection (Arm C), and top glove removal post disinfection (Arm D). Quantitative bacterial load reduction was compared for glove use (Arm C − Arm A), and for disinfectant use in addition to glove use (Arm D − Arm C). Qualitative detection of any bacterial load (present/absent) on under glove in the setting of disinfection prior to top glove removal was also assessed. RESULTS: Of 10(8) CFU inoculated, the median recovery was 1.2 × 10(4) CFU (both bacteria combined). After glove removal (no disinfection), the median recovery from the under glove was 2.7 × 10(2) CFU, for a reduction of 98% (1.6 log) in bacterial load. After top glove disinfection and removal, the median bacterial recovery from the under glove was 1.4 × 10(2), 0, and 0 CFU for alcohol, quat, and bleach (47% or 0.3 log reduction for alcohol; 99% or 2 log reduction for quat and bleach) (Figure 1). Regardless of quantity, bacteria were recovered from under gloves even after top glove disinfection in 70%, 40%, and 35% cases for alcohol, quat, and bleach, respectively (Figure 2). CONCLUSION: Glove disinfection prior to glove removal is effective at reducing bacterial contamination of HCW hands. However, despite disinfection, some level of hand contamination occurs frequently. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: J. K. Johnson, Q-Linea: Investigator, Research grant. Applied Biocode: Investigator, Research grant Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253001/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy209.135 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Robinson, Gwen
Kpadeh, Zegbeh Z
Alserehi, Haleema
Morgan, Daniel
Harris, Anthony D
Johnson, J Kristie
Leekha, Surbhi
1729. Effect of Glove Disinfection on Bacterial Contamination of Healthcare Worker Hands
title 1729. Effect of Glove Disinfection on Bacterial Contamination of Healthcare Worker Hands
title_full 1729. Effect of Glove Disinfection on Bacterial Contamination of Healthcare Worker Hands
title_fullStr 1729. Effect of Glove Disinfection on Bacterial Contamination of Healthcare Worker Hands
title_full_unstemmed 1729. Effect of Glove Disinfection on Bacterial Contamination of Healthcare Worker Hands
title_short 1729. Effect of Glove Disinfection on Bacterial Contamination of Healthcare Worker Hands
title_sort 1729. effect of glove disinfection on bacterial contamination of healthcare worker hands
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253001/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy209.135
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsongwen 1729effectofglovedisinfectiononbacterialcontaminationofhealthcareworkerhands
AT kpadehzegbehz 1729effectofglovedisinfectiononbacterialcontaminationofhealthcareworkerhands
AT alserehihaleema 1729effectofglovedisinfectiononbacterialcontaminationofhealthcareworkerhands
AT morgandaniel 1729effectofglovedisinfectiononbacterialcontaminationofhealthcareworkerhands
AT harrisanthonyd 1729effectofglovedisinfectiononbacterialcontaminationofhealthcareworkerhands
AT johnsonjkristie 1729effectofglovedisinfectiononbacterialcontaminationofhealthcareworkerhands
AT leekhasurbhi 1729effectofglovedisinfectiononbacterialcontaminationofhealthcareworkerhands