Cargando…

2025. Procalcitonin Reference Cutoff and Specimen-Type Validation

INVESTIGATION: The primary objective of this study was to validate that the clinical cutoff of 0.3 ng/mL is appropriate in our population of patients. The secondary objective of this study was to compare procalcitonin results in plasma and serum specimens to prove that both sample types gave similar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad, Muhammad, Adaya, Annaliza, Patel, Dipika, Benirschke, Robert, Lee, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253040/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1681
_version_ 1783373404828598272
author Ahmad, Muhammad
Adaya, Annaliza
Patel, Dipika
Benirschke, Robert
Lee, Hong
author_facet Ahmad, Muhammad
Adaya, Annaliza
Patel, Dipika
Benirschke, Robert
Lee, Hong
author_sort Ahmad, Muhammad
collection PubMed
description INVESTIGATION: The primary objective of this study was to validate that the clinical cutoff of 0.3 ng/mL is appropriate in our population of patients. The secondary objective of this study was to compare procalcitonin results in plasma and serum specimens to prove that both sample types gave similar results. BACKGROUND: Our institution started performing procalcitonin testing on November 29, 2017. The Roche package insert indicated that in a population of 282 self-reported healthy individuals, the 95th percentile, upper reference range limit was calculated at 0.08 ng/mL. This 95th percentile cutoff seemed to be much lower than published clinical cutoffs of 0.25 and 0.30 ng/mL. Upon extensive literature review and discussion with pediatric and adult infectious disease physicians, we decided to use the clinical cutoff of 0.3 ng/mL to indicate invasive bacterial infection in our institution. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty patients with normal renal and hepatic function, white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein below 5.0 mg/L were selected for the validation of procalcitonin clinical cutoff. An additional 100 patients with paired plasma and serum specimens drawn at the same time were selected for the plasma vs. serum comparison study. All results were analyzed using the R statistical program. RESULTS: Blood specimens from 128 females and 122 male patients ranging from 10 to 84 years old were utilized in this study. Out of the 250 specimens, 128 were plasma and 122 were serum specimens. The procalcitonin 95th percentile upper reference range limit based on our population was 0.08 ng/mL, which validated the Roche package insert claim. Only one out of 250 patients (0.4%) had procalcitonin result above 0.3 ng/mL. The paired plasma and serum specimens in 100 patients yielded procalcitonin results that correlated with a Pearson’s R value of 0.999. The linear regression equation for the correlation was y = 0.94x. CONCLUSION: This result confirmed that a procalcitonin clinical cutoff of 0.3 ng/mL is appropriate in our patient population. It also showed that both plasma and serum specimens can be used for procalcitonin measurement. DISCLOSURES: M. Ahmad, Roche: Collaborator, Research support. A. Adaya, Roche: Collaborator, Research support. D. Patel, Roche: Collaborator, Research support. R. Benirschke, Roche: Collaborator, Research support. H. Lee, Roche: Collaborator, Research support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62530402018-11-28 2025. Procalcitonin Reference Cutoff and Specimen-Type Validation Ahmad, Muhammad Adaya, Annaliza Patel, Dipika Benirschke, Robert Lee, Hong Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts INVESTIGATION: The primary objective of this study was to validate that the clinical cutoff of 0.3 ng/mL is appropriate in our population of patients. The secondary objective of this study was to compare procalcitonin results in plasma and serum specimens to prove that both sample types gave similar results. BACKGROUND: Our institution started performing procalcitonin testing on November 29, 2017. The Roche package insert indicated that in a population of 282 self-reported healthy individuals, the 95th percentile, upper reference range limit was calculated at 0.08 ng/mL. This 95th percentile cutoff seemed to be much lower than published clinical cutoffs of 0.25 and 0.30 ng/mL. Upon extensive literature review and discussion with pediatric and adult infectious disease physicians, we decided to use the clinical cutoff of 0.3 ng/mL to indicate invasive bacterial infection in our institution. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty patients with normal renal and hepatic function, white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein below 5.0 mg/L were selected for the validation of procalcitonin clinical cutoff. An additional 100 patients with paired plasma and serum specimens drawn at the same time were selected for the plasma vs. serum comparison study. All results were analyzed using the R statistical program. RESULTS: Blood specimens from 128 females and 122 male patients ranging from 10 to 84 years old were utilized in this study. Out of the 250 specimens, 128 were plasma and 122 were serum specimens. The procalcitonin 95th percentile upper reference range limit based on our population was 0.08 ng/mL, which validated the Roche package insert claim. Only one out of 250 patients (0.4%) had procalcitonin result above 0.3 ng/mL. The paired plasma and serum specimens in 100 patients yielded procalcitonin results that correlated with a Pearson’s R value of 0.999. The linear regression equation for the correlation was y = 0.94x. CONCLUSION: This result confirmed that a procalcitonin clinical cutoff of 0.3 ng/mL is appropriate in our patient population. It also showed that both plasma and serum specimens can be used for procalcitonin measurement. DISCLOSURES: M. Ahmad, Roche: Collaborator, Research support. A. Adaya, Roche: Collaborator, Research support. D. Patel, Roche: Collaborator, Research support. R. Benirschke, Roche: Collaborator, Research support. H. Lee, Roche: Collaborator, Research support. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253040/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1681 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Ahmad, Muhammad
Adaya, Annaliza
Patel, Dipika
Benirschke, Robert
Lee, Hong
2025. Procalcitonin Reference Cutoff and Specimen-Type Validation
title 2025. Procalcitonin Reference Cutoff and Specimen-Type Validation
title_full 2025. Procalcitonin Reference Cutoff and Specimen-Type Validation
title_fullStr 2025. Procalcitonin Reference Cutoff and Specimen-Type Validation
title_full_unstemmed 2025. Procalcitonin Reference Cutoff and Specimen-Type Validation
title_short 2025. Procalcitonin Reference Cutoff and Specimen-Type Validation
title_sort 2025. procalcitonin reference cutoff and specimen-type validation
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253040/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1681
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadmuhammad 2025procalcitoninreferencecutoffandspecimentypevalidation
AT adayaannaliza 2025procalcitoninreferencecutoffandspecimentypevalidation
AT pateldipika 2025procalcitoninreferencecutoffandspecimentypevalidation
AT benirschkerobert 2025procalcitoninreferencecutoffandspecimentypevalidation
AT leehong 2025procalcitoninreferencecutoffandspecimentypevalidation