Cargando…

1187. Retrospective and Prospective Analysis of Acinetobacter Modern-Day Clinical Isolates in a Large Mid-West Hospital System

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of contemporary Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (AcbC) strains in the United States is understudied. In addition to increasing multidrug resistance, there is concern that the rates of AcbC infections acquired outside of hospitals and the anatomic distributi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calix, Juan, Burnham, Carey-Ann D, Feldman, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253046/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1020
_version_ 1783373406321770496
author Calix, Juan
Burnham, Carey-Ann D
Feldman, Mario
author_facet Calix, Juan
Burnham, Carey-Ann D
Feldman, Mario
author_sort Calix, Juan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of contemporary Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (AcbC) strains in the United States is understudied. In addition to increasing multidrug resistance, there is concern that the rates of AcbC infections acquired outside of hospitals and the anatomic distribution of these infections may differ from what is previously reported. Furthermore, the epidemiology of non-AcbC clinical isolates is poorly characterized. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all cases associated with Acinetobacter clinical isolates in the Barnes-Jewish/Children’s Hospital system (St. Louis, MO) from 2007 to 2017. First isolates were classified as AcbC or non-AcbC. Tissue of origin, hospital-day of isolation, and antibiotic resistance profiles were determined. Results were compared with an ongoing prospective analysis of Acinetobacter isolates in the same system, started in July 2017. RESULTS: We identified 2,959 and 1,243 cases associated with AcbC and non-AcbC isolates, respectively. In both groups, isolates were most commonly obtained from respiratory (34% and 30% of total isolates) and connective tissue (34% and 27% of total isolates) sites. Urinary tract specimens were more likely to occur among AcbC isolates compared with non-AcBC isolates (664/2,959 [22%] vs. 147/1,243 [12%], P < 0.001). The percentage of isolates obtained prior to hospital-day-2 are 62% and 78% for AcbC and non-AcbC isolates, respectively. AcbC isolates were markedly more resistant to all classes of antibiotics. Analysis of 77 AcbC and 58 non-AcbC prospectively collected isolates revealed similar clinical findings. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the protean nature of Acinetobacter clinical isolates, and begins to describe relevant differences between AcbC and non-AcbC strains. These distinctions support the practice of identifying clinical isolates using AcbC and non-AcbC labels. Ongoing studies will further describe the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes associated with Acinetobacter disease in our system. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62530462018-11-28 1187. Retrospective and Prospective Analysis of Acinetobacter Modern-Day Clinical Isolates in a Large Mid-West Hospital System Calix, Juan Burnham, Carey-Ann D Feldman, Mario Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of contemporary Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (AcbC) strains in the United States is understudied. In addition to increasing multidrug resistance, there is concern that the rates of AcbC infections acquired outside of hospitals and the anatomic distribution of these infections may differ from what is previously reported. Furthermore, the epidemiology of non-AcbC clinical isolates is poorly characterized. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all cases associated with Acinetobacter clinical isolates in the Barnes-Jewish/Children’s Hospital system (St. Louis, MO) from 2007 to 2017. First isolates were classified as AcbC or non-AcbC. Tissue of origin, hospital-day of isolation, and antibiotic resistance profiles were determined. Results were compared with an ongoing prospective analysis of Acinetobacter isolates in the same system, started in July 2017. RESULTS: We identified 2,959 and 1,243 cases associated with AcbC and non-AcbC isolates, respectively. In both groups, isolates were most commonly obtained from respiratory (34% and 30% of total isolates) and connective tissue (34% and 27% of total isolates) sites. Urinary tract specimens were more likely to occur among AcbC isolates compared with non-AcBC isolates (664/2,959 [22%] vs. 147/1,243 [12%], P < 0.001). The percentage of isolates obtained prior to hospital-day-2 are 62% and 78% for AcbC and non-AcbC isolates, respectively. AcbC isolates were markedly more resistant to all classes of antibiotics. Analysis of 77 AcbC and 58 non-AcbC prospectively collected isolates revealed similar clinical findings. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the protean nature of Acinetobacter clinical isolates, and begins to describe relevant differences between AcbC and non-AcbC strains. These distinctions support the practice of identifying clinical isolates using AcbC and non-AcbC labels. Ongoing studies will further describe the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes associated with Acinetobacter disease in our system. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253046/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1020 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Calix, Juan
Burnham, Carey-Ann D
Feldman, Mario
1187. Retrospective and Prospective Analysis of Acinetobacter Modern-Day Clinical Isolates in a Large Mid-West Hospital System
title 1187. Retrospective and Prospective Analysis of Acinetobacter Modern-Day Clinical Isolates in a Large Mid-West Hospital System
title_full 1187. Retrospective and Prospective Analysis of Acinetobacter Modern-Day Clinical Isolates in a Large Mid-West Hospital System
title_fullStr 1187. Retrospective and Prospective Analysis of Acinetobacter Modern-Day Clinical Isolates in a Large Mid-West Hospital System
title_full_unstemmed 1187. Retrospective and Prospective Analysis of Acinetobacter Modern-Day Clinical Isolates in a Large Mid-West Hospital System
title_short 1187. Retrospective and Prospective Analysis of Acinetobacter Modern-Day Clinical Isolates in a Large Mid-West Hospital System
title_sort 1187. retrospective and prospective analysis of acinetobacter modern-day clinical isolates in a large mid-west hospital system
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253046/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1020
work_keys_str_mv AT calixjuan 1187retrospectiveandprospectiveanalysisofacinetobactermoderndayclinicalisolatesinalargemidwesthospitalsystem
AT burnhamcareyannd 1187retrospectiveandprospectiveanalysisofacinetobactermoderndayclinicalisolatesinalargemidwesthospitalsystem
AT feldmanmario 1187retrospectiveandprospectiveanalysisofacinetobactermoderndayclinicalisolatesinalargemidwesthospitalsystem