Cargando…

2058. Comparison of Drug Resistance Rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the Conventional Drug Susceptibility Test and Sequencing Method

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and is among the top 10 causes of death worldwide. Multidrug-resistant TB is increasing, with almost 480,000 new cases. According to drug resistance surveillance data, 3.9% of these are new cases and 21% previously treated TB case...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kim, Han-Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253074/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1714
_version_ 1783373412969742336
author Kim, Han-Sung
author_facet Kim, Han-Sung
author_sort Kim, Han-Sung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and is among the top 10 causes of death worldwide. Multidrug-resistant TB is increasing, with almost 480,000 new cases. According to drug resistance surveillance data, 3.9% of these are new cases and 21% previously treated TB cases. The aim of this study was to compare the results from the conventional drug susceptibility test (DST) and the sequencing method. METHODS: The study included 122 individuals with TB. Drug susceptibility was tested by the conventional DST and sequencing. We calculated the drug resistance rate of each anti-tuberculosis agent and compared the resistance pattern according to each method. RESULTS: The resistance rates by conventional DST were 6.3, 9.4, 3.1, 7.0, 0.8, and 4.8% for rifampicin, isoniazid, streptomycin, ethambutol, fluoroquinolones, and pyrazinamide, respectively, in the newly diagnosed group, and 4% for both isoniazid and fluoroquinolones in the previously treated group. The resistance rates by sequencing were 6.3, 9.2, 2.0, and 5.8% for rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide, respectively, in the newly diagnosed group and 21.1, 28.6, 5.0, and 13.0% for rifampicin, isoniazid, streptomycin, and pyrazinamide, respectively, in the previously treated group. The concordance rates of isoniazid were 70% for resistance and 95% for susceptibility; rifampicin, 80% for resistance and 98% for susceptibility; ethambutol, 98% for susceptibility; pyrazinamide, 17% for resistance and 96% for susceptibility; streptomycin, 98% for susceptibility; and fluoroquinolones, 98% for susceptibility. CONCLUSION: The resistance patterns of rifampicin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide by both methods were analogous to each other in the newly diagnosed group. In addition, the concordance rates of drug susceptibility were high. Therefore, it is helpful to perform both the conventional DST and sequencing method for more precise detection of drug resistance of M. tuberculosis. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62530742018-11-28 2058. Comparison of Drug Resistance Rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the Conventional Drug Susceptibility Test and Sequencing Method Kim, Han-Sung Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and is among the top 10 causes of death worldwide. Multidrug-resistant TB is increasing, with almost 480,000 new cases. According to drug resistance surveillance data, 3.9% of these are new cases and 21% previously treated TB cases. The aim of this study was to compare the results from the conventional drug susceptibility test (DST) and the sequencing method. METHODS: The study included 122 individuals with TB. Drug susceptibility was tested by the conventional DST and sequencing. We calculated the drug resistance rate of each anti-tuberculosis agent and compared the resistance pattern according to each method. RESULTS: The resistance rates by conventional DST were 6.3, 9.4, 3.1, 7.0, 0.8, and 4.8% for rifampicin, isoniazid, streptomycin, ethambutol, fluoroquinolones, and pyrazinamide, respectively, in the newly diagnosed group, and 4% for both isoniazid and fluoroquinolones in the previously treated group. The resistance rates by sequencing were 6.3, 9.2, 2.0, and 5.8% for rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide, respectively, in the newly diagnosed group and 21.1, 28.6, 5.0, and 13.0% for rifampicin, isoniazid, streptomycin, and pyrazinamide, respectively, in the previously treated group. The concordance rates of isoniazid were 70% for resistance and 95% for susceptibility; rifampicin, 80% for resistance and 98% for susceptibility; ethambutol, 98% for susceptibility; pyrazinamide, 17% for resistance and 96% for susceptibility; streptomycin, 98% for susceptibility; and fluoroquinolones, 98% for susceptibility. CONCLUSION: The resistance patterns of rifampicin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide by both methods were analogous to each other in the newly diagnosed group. In addition, the concordance rates of drug susceptibility were high. Therefore, it is helpful to perform both the conventional DST and sequencing method for more precise detection of drug resistance of M. tuberculosis. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253074/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1714 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Kim, Han-Sung
2058. Comparison of Drug Resistance Rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the Conventional Drug Susceptibility Test and Sequencing Method
title 2058. Comparison of Drug Resistance Rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the Conventional Drug Susceptibility Test and Sequencing Method
title_full 2058. Comparison of Drug Resistance Rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the Conventional Drug Susceptibility Test and Sequencing Method
title_fullStr 2058. Comparison of Drug Resistance Rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the Conventional Drug Susceptibility Test and Sequencing Method
title_full_unstemmed 2058. Comparison of Drug Resistance Rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the Conventional Drug Susceptibility Test and Sequencing Method
title_short 2058. Comparison of Drug Resistance Rates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the Conventional Drug Susceptibility Test and Sequencing Method
title_sort 2058. comparison of drug resistance rates of mycobacterium tuberculosis by the conventional drug susceptibility test and sequencing method
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253074/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1714
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhansung 2058comparisonofdrugresistanceratesofmycobacteriumtuberculosisbytheconventionaldrugsusceptibilitytestandsequencingmethod