Cargando…

1976. Pooled Analysis of Safety Data From Phases 2 and 3 Clinical Trials Evaluating Eravacycline in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections

BACKGROUND: Eravacycline is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic that was evaluated in three comparator-controlled studies for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the safety profile of eravacycline 1 mg/kg IV q12...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Efimova, Ekaterina, Olesky, Melanie, Izmailyan, Sergey, Tsai, Larry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253170/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1632
_version_ 1783373435846524928
author Efimova, Ekaterina
Olesky, Melanie
Izmailyan, Sergey
Tsai, Larry
author_facet Efimova, Ekaterina
Olesky, Melanie
Izmailyan, Sergey
Tsai, Larry
author_sort Efimova, Ekaterina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eravacycline is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic that was evaluated in three comparator-controlled studies for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the safety profile of eravacycline 1 mg/kg IV q12h for the treatment of cIAI. METHODS: Pooled data from one phase 2 and two phase 3 (IGNITE1 and IGNITE4) clinical trials in cIAI were analyzed. Patients in the trials were randomized to receive eravacycline 1 mg/kg IV q12h, ertapenem 1 g IV q24h, or meropenem 1 g IV q8h for 4–14 days. Overall treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and laboratory assessments were evaluated. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-six patients were treated with eravacycline 1 mg/kg IV q12h and 547 patients with comparators (ertapenem and meropenem). Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar among the groups. Overall summary and common TEAEs are presented in Table 1. None of the serious TEAEs or those leading to death were related to the study drug. Clinically notable laboratory abnormalities were relatively uncommon and occurred at similar frequencies in eravacycline- and comparator-treated patients. CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis demonstrated that eravacycline 1 mg/kg IV q12h was generally well tolerated for the treatment of cIAI when compared with ertapenem and meropenem. Results of the analysis are consistent with those of individual clinical studies and no new safety signals were identified. DISCLOSURES: E. Efimova, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Employee, Salary. M. Olesky, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. S. Izmailyan, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Employee, Salary. L. Tsai, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Employee and Shareholder, Salary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62531702018-11-28 1976. Pooled Analysis of Safety Data From Phases 2 and 3 Clinical Trials Evaluating Eravacycline in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections Efimova, Ekaterina Olesky, Melanie Izmailyan, Sergey Tsai, Larry Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Eravacycline is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic that was evaluated in three comparator-controlled studies for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the safety profile of eravacycline 1 mg/kg IV q12h for the treatment of cIAI. METHODS: Pooled data from one phase 2 and two phase 3 (IGNITE1 and IGNITE4) clinical trials in cIAI were analyzed. Patients in the trials were randomized to receive eravacycline 1 mg/kg IV q12h, ertapenem 1 g IV q24h, or meropenem 1 g IV q8h for 4–14 days. Overall treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and laboratory assessments were evaluated. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-six patients were treated with eravacycline 1 mg/kg IV q12h and 547 patients with comparators (ertapenem and meropenem). Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar among the groups. Overall summary and common TEAEs are presented in Table 1. None of the serious TEAEs or those leading to death were related to the study drug. Clinically notable laboratory abnormalities were relatively uncommon and occurred at similar frequencies in eravacycline- and comparator-treated patients. CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis demonstrated that eravacycline 1 mg/kg IV q12h was generally well tolerated for the treatment of cIAI when compared with ertapenem and meropenem. Results of the analysis are consistent with those of individual clinical studies and no new safety signals were identified. DISCLOSURES: E. Efimova, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Employee, Salary. M. Olesky, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. S. Izmailyan, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Employee, Salary. L. Tsai, Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253170/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1632 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Efimova, Ekaterina
Olesky, Melanie
Izmailyan, Sergey
Tsai, Larry
1976. Pooled Analysis of Safety Data From Phases 2 and 3 Clinical Trials Evaluating Eravacycline in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
title 1976. Pooled Analysis of Safety Data From Phases 2 and 3 Clinical Trials Evaluating Eravacycline in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
title_full 1976. Pooled Analysis of Safety Data From Phases 2 and 3 Clinical Trials Evaluating Eravacycline in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
title_fullStr 1976. Pooled Analysis of Safety Data From Phases 2 and 3 Clinical Trials Evaluating Eravacycline in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
title_full_unstemmed 1976. Pooled Analysis of Safety Data From Phases 2 and 3 Clinical Trials Evaluating Eravacycline in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
title_short 1976. Pooled Analysis of Safety Data From Phases 2 and 3 Clinical Trials Evaluating Eravacycline in Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
title_sort 1976. pooled analysis of safety data from phases 2 and 3 clinical trials evaluating eravacycline in complicated intra-abdominal infections
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253170/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1632
work_keys_str_mv AT efimovaekaterina 1976pooledanalysisofsafetydatafromphases2and3clinicaltrialsevaluatingeravacyclineincomplicatedintraabdominalinfections
AT oleskymelanie 1976pooledanalysisofsafetydatafromphases2and3clinicaltrialsevaluatingeravacyclineincomplicatedintraabdominalinfections
AT izmailyansergey 1976pooledanalysisofsafetydatafromphases2and3clinicaltrialsevaluatingeravacyclineincomplicatedintraabdominalinfections
AT tsailarry 1976pooledanalysisofsafetydatafromphases2and3clinicaltrialsevaluatingeravacyclineincomplicatedintraabdominalinfections