Cargando…

1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial

BACKGROUND: Contaminated blood cultures remain a challenge for patients, physicians, and microbiology laboratories, often leading to unnecessary antibiotic treatment. One approach to reduce contamination is to avoid culturing the initial blood sample that can contain a contaminated plug of skin from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strahilevitz, Jacob, Svinik, Or, Lalezari, Alon, Tel-Zur, Odaya, Sinvani, Shlomo, Al-Dayem, Yasmin Sa’id Abed, Moses, Allon, Cohen, Matan, Oster, Yonatan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253253/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.981
_version_ 1783373455381495808
author Strahilevitz, Jacob
Svinik, Or
Lalezari, Alon
Tel-Zur, Odaya
Sinvani, Shlomo
Al-Dayem, Yasmin Sa’id Abed
Moses, Allon
Cohen, Matan
Oster, Yonatan
author_facet Strahilevitz, Jacob
Svinik, Or
Lalezari, Alon
Tel-Zur, Odaya
Sinvani, Shlomo
Al-Dayem, Yasmin Sa’id Abed
Moses, Allon
Cohen, Matan
Oster, Yonatan
author_sort Strahilevitz, Jacob
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Contaminated blood cultures remain a challenge for patients, physicians, and microbiology laboratories, often leading to unnecessary antibiotic treatment. One approach to reduce contamination is to avoid culturing the initial blood sample that can contain a contaminated plug of skin from the needle stick. Initial specimen diversion technique (ISDT) was associated with decreased rate of blood culture contamination, when applied by trained phlebotomists, using either sterile vacuum blood collection tubes or a designated device. The aim of this study was to test ISDT in real-life, using externally nonsterile regular vacuum sample tubes for the diversion, by any medical personnel taking blood cultures. METHODS: Adults from whom the treating physician planned to take blood cultures and additional blood chemistry tests, in the same venous puncture, were eligible and were randomly assigned to intervention or control arms. The hospital’s standard procedure for blood drawing was maintained, except that in the intervention arm, blood was aspirated to a green-capped tube, which was used for regular biochemistry tests, prior to the blood culture. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-three blood cultures were obtained from 404 patients. Of 404 (11.1%) of the blood cultures, 45 yielded microbial growth, with 31 (7.7%) regarded as true pathogens and 14 (3.5%) as contaminants. Detection of true bloodstream infection was similar by the two methods, 16/181 (8.83%) with the ISDT, and 15/223 (6.72%) using the standard method. The ISDT was associated with a significantly less isolation of presumed contaminants compared with the standard method, 2/165 (1.2%) vs. 12/208 (5.76%), P = 0.02. CONCLUSION: ISDT, by any medical personnel, through altered order of test tube vs. blood culture sampling significantly reduced contamination of blood cultures without loss of diverted blood. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62532532018-11-28 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial Strahilevitz, Jacob Svinik, Or Lalezari, Alon Tel-Zur, Odaya Sinvani, Shlomo Al-Dayem, Yasmin Sa’id Abed Moses, Allon Cohen, Matan Oster, Yonatan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Contaminated blood cultures remain a challenge for patients, physicians, and microbiology laboratories, often leading to unnecessary antibiotic treatment. One approach to reduce contamination is to avoid culturing the initial blood sample that can contain a contaminated plug of skin from the needle stick. Initial specimen diversion technique (ISDT) was associated with decreased rate of blood culture contamination, when applied by trained phlebotomists, using either sterile vacuum blood collection tubes or a designated device. The aim of this study was to test ISDT in real-life, using externally nonsterile regular vacuum sample tubes for the diversion, by any medical personnel taking blood cultures. METHODS: Adults from whom the treating physician planned to take blood cultures and additional blood chemistry tests, in the same venous puncture, were eligible and were randomly assigned to intervention or control arms. The hospital’s standard procedure for blood drawing was maintained, except that in the intervention arm, blood was aspirated to a green-capped tube, which was used for regular biochemistry tests, prior to the blood culture. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-three blood cultures were obtained from 404 patients. Of 404 (11.1%) of the blood cultures, 45 yielded microbial growth, with 31 (7.7%) regarded as true pathogens and 14 (3.5%) as contaminants. Detection of true bloodstream infection was similar by the two methods, 16/181 (8.83%) with the ISDT, and 15/223 (6.72%) using the standard method. The ISDT was associated with a significantly less isolation of presumed contaminants compared with the standard method, 2/165 (1.2%) vs. 12/208 (5.76%), P = 0.02. CONCLUSION: ISDT, by any medical personnel, through altered order of test tube vs. blood culture sampling significantly reduced contamination of blood cultures without loss of diverted blood. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253253/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.981 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Strahilevitz, Jacob
Svinik, Or
Lalezari, Alon
Tel-Zur, Odaya
Sinvani, Shlomo
Al-Dayem, Yasmin Sa’id Abed
Moses, Allon
Cohen, Matan
Oster, Yonatan
1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial
title 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial
title_full 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial
title_fullStr 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial
title_full_unstemmed 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial
title_short 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial
title_sort 1148. reduction of blood culture contamination rates by an altered sampling protocol: single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253253/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.981
work_keys_str_mv AT strahilevitzjacob 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT svinikor 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT lalezarialon 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT telzurodaya 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT sinvanishlomo 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT aldayemyasminsaidabed 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT mosesallon 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT cohenmatan 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial
AT osteryonatan 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial