Cargando…
1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial
BACKGROUND: Contaminated blood cultures remain a challenge for patients, physicians, and microbiology laboratories, often leading to unnecessary antibiotic treatment. One approach to reduce contamination is to avoid culturing the initial blood sample that can contain a contaminated plug of skin from...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253253/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.981 |
_version_ | 1783373455381495808 |
---|---|
author | Strahilevitz, Jacob Svinik, Or Lalezari, Alon Tel-Zur, Odaya Sinvani, Shlomo Al-Dayem, Yasmin Sa’id Abed Moses, Allon Cohen, Matan Oster, Yonatan |
author_facet | Strahilevitz, Jacob Svinik, Or Lalezari, Alon Tel-Zur, Odaya Sinvani, Shlomo Al-Dayem, Yasmin Sa’id Abed Moses, Allon Cohen, Matan Oster, Yonatan |
author_sort | Strahilevitz, Jacob |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Contaminated blood cultures remain a challenge for patients, physicians, and microbiology laboratories, often leading to unnecessary antibiotic treatment. One approach to reduce contamination is to avoid culturing the initial blood sample that can contain a contaminated plug of skin from the needle stick. Initial specimen diversion technique (ISDT) was associated with decreased rate of blood culture contamination, when applied by trained phlebotomists, using either sterile vacuum blood collection tubes or a designated device. The aim of this study was to test ISDT in real-life, using externally nonsterile regular vacuum sample tubes for the diversion, by any medical personnel taking blood cultures. METHODS: Adults from whom the treating physician planned to take blood cultures and additional blood chemistry tests, in the same venous puncture, were eligible and were randomly assigned to intervention or control arms. The hospital’s standard procedure for blood drawing was maintained, except that in the intervention arm, blood was aspirated to a green-capped tube, which was used for regular biochemistry tests, prior to the blood culture. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-three blood cultures were obtained from 404 patients. Of 404 (11.1%) of the blood cultures, 45 yielded microbial growth, with 31 (7.7%) regarded as true pathogens and 14 (3.5%) as contaminants. Detection of true bloodstream infection was similar by the two methods, 16/181 (8.83%) with the ISDT, and 15/223 (6.72%) using the standard method. The ISDT was associated with a significantly less isolation of presumed contaminants compared with the standard method, 2/165 (1.2%) vs. 12/208 (5.76%), P = 0.02. CONCLUSION: ISDT, by any medical personnel, through altered order of test tube vs. blood culture sampling significantly reduced contamination of blood cultures without loss of diverted blood. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6253253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62532532018-11-28 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial Strahilevitz, Jacob Svinik, Or Lalezari, Alon Tel-Zur, Odaya Sinvani, Shlomo Al-Dayem, Yasmin Sa’id Abed Moses, Allon Cohen, Matan Oster, Yonatan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Contaminated blood cultures remain a challenge for patients, physicians, and microbiology laboratories, often leading to unnecessary antibiotic treatment. One approach to reduce contamination is to avoid culturing the initial blood sample that can contain a contaminated plug of skin from the needle stick. Initial specimen diversion technique (ISDT) was associated with decreased rate of blood culture contamination, when applied by trained phlebotomists, using either sterile vacuum blood collection tubes or a designated device. The aim of this study was to test ISDT in real-life, using externally nonsterile regular vacuum sample tubes for the diversion, by any medical personnel taking blood cultures. METHODS: Adults from whom the treating physician planned to take blood cultures and additional blood chemistry tests, in the same venous puncture, were eligible and were randomly assigned to intervention or control arms. The hospital’s standard procedure for blood drawing was maintained, except that in the intervention arm, blood was aspirated to a green-capped tube, which was used for regular biochemistry tests, prior to the blood culture. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-three blood cultures were obtained from 404 patients. Of 404 (11.1%) of the blood cultures, 45 yielded microbial growth, with 31 (7.7%) regarded as true pathogens and 14 (3.5%) as contaminants. Detection of true bloodstream infection was similar by the two methods, 16/181 (8.83%) with the ISDT, and 15/223 (6.72%) using the standard method. The ISDT was associated with a significantly less isolation of presumed contaminants compared with the standard method, 2/165 (1.2%) vs. 12/208 (5.76%), P = 0.02. CONCLUSION: ISDT, by any medical personnel, through altered order of test tube vs. blood culture sampling significantly reduced contamination of blood cultures without loss of diverted blood. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253253/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.981 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Strahilevitz, Jacob Svinik, Or Lalezari, Alon Tel-Zur, Odaya Sinvani, Shlomo Al-Dayem, Yasmin Sa’id Abed Moses, Allon Cohen, Matan Oster, Yonatan 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial |
title | 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial |
title_full | 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial |
title_fullStr | 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial |
title_short | 1148. Reduction of Blood Culture Contamination Rates by an Altered Sampling Protocol: Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial |
title_sort | 1148. reduction of blood culture contamination rates by an altered sampling protocol: single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label trial |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253253/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.981 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strahilevitzjacob 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT svinikor 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT lalezarialon 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT telzurodaya 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT sinvanishlomo 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT aldayemyasminsaidabed 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT mosesallon 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT cohenmatan 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial AT osteryonatan 1148reductionofbloodculturecontaminationratesbyanalteredsamplingprotocolsinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledopenlabeltrial |