Cargando…

371. Risk Factors for Non-Albicans Candidal Vulvovaginitis

BACKGROUND: Every year millions of women experience vulvo-vaginal candida. While the majority of the women with vulvo-vaginal candida are infected with albicans, the distribution of non-albicans candida (NAC) species varies depending on geography, race and ethnicity, and past medical history. While...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tressler, Andrea Boyd, Fortin, Chelsea, Radeva, Milena, Goje, Oluwatosin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253330/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.382
_version_ 1783373472916832256
author Tressler, Andrea Boyd
Fortin, Chelsea
Radeva, Milena
Goje, Oluwatosin
author_facet Tressler, Andrea Boyd
Fortin, Chelsea
Radeva, Milena
Goje, Oluwatosin
author_sort Tressler, Andrea Boyd
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Every year millions of women experience vulvo-vaginal candida. While the majority of the women with vulvo-vaginal candida are infected with albicans, the distribution of non-albicans candida (NAC) species varies depending on geography, race and ethnicity, and past medical history. While there are studies that explore the relationship between these factors and the incidence of NAC many of these studies are outdated. In this study, we explore the clinical risk factors for development of NAC compared with the more common albicans candida infections. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study. 174 women with a positive candida culture were identified via a database maintained by the Cleveland Clinic Microbiology department. Exclusion criteria were women with negative cultures, those under the age of 18, or with an initial encounter prior to 2004. RESULTS: The average age of women who presented with NAC was 41.5 [31.0, 53.0] and was not statistically significant from women with no NAC, 43.0 [42.0, 45.0] (P = 0.19). Among all initial positive yeast cultures 34.5% were C. glabrata followed by C. parapsilosis at 3.4%. Women who had a positive NAC culture were more likely to be post-menopausal than those with no NAC, 73.8 NAC vs. 26.2 no NAC (P ≤ 0.001). Additionally, women cultured with NAC were more likely to be on hormone replacement therapy, 77.8 NAC vs. 22.2 no NAC (P = 0.011). However, we found that recent antibiotic use, diabetes, and probiotic use had no impact. CONCLUSION: This study shows that post-menopausal women and women who are hormone replacement therapy are more likely to be colonized by NAC indicating that these are risk factors. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62533302018-11-28 371. Risk Factors for Non-Albicans Candidal Vulvovaginitis Tressler, Andrea Boyd Fortin, Chelsea Radeva, Milena Goje, Oluwatosin Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Every year millions of women experience vulvo-vaginal candida. While the majority of the women with vulvo-vaginal candida are infected with albicans, the distribution of non-albicans candida (NAC) species varies depending on geography, race and ethnicity, and past medical history. While there are studies that explore the relationship between these factors and the incidence of NAC many of these studies are outdated. In this study, we explore the clinical risk factors for development of NAC compared with the more common albicans candida infections. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study. 174 women with a positive candida culture were identified via a database maintained by the Cleveland Clinic Microbiology department. Exclusion criteria were women with negative cultures, those under the age of 18, or with an initial encounter prior to 2004. RESULTS: The average age of women who presented with NAC was 41.5 [31.0, 53.0] and was not statistically significant from women with no NAC, 43.0 [42.0, 45.0] (P = 0.19). Among all initial positive yeast cultures 34.5% were C. glabrata followed by C. parapsilosis at 3.4%. Women who had a positive NAC culture were more likely to be post-menopausal than those with no NAC, 73.8 NAC vs. 26.2 no NAC (P ≤ 0.001). Additionally, women cultured with NAC were more likely to be on hormone replacement therapy, 77.8 NAC vs. 22.2 no NAC (P = 0.011). However, we found that recent antibiotic use, diabetes, and probiotic use had no impact. CONCLUSION: This study shows that post-menopausal women and women who are hormone replacement therapy are more likely to be colonized by NAC indicating that these are risk factors. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253330/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.382 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Tressler, Andrea Boyd
Fortin, Chelsea
Radeva, Milena
Goje, Oluwatosin
371. Risk Factors for Non-Albicans Candidal Vulvovaginitis
title 371. Risk Factors for Non-Albicans Candidal Vulvovaginitis
title_full 371. Risk Factors for Non-Albicans Candidal Vulvovaginitis
title_fullStr 371. Risk Factors for Non-Albicans Candidal Vulvovaginitis
title_full_unstemmed 371. Risk Factors for Non-Albicans Candidal Vulvovaginitis
title_short 371. Risk Factors for Non-Albicans Candidal Vulvovaginitis
title_sort 371. risk factors for non-albicans candidal vulvovaginitis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253330/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.382
work_keys_str_mv AT tresslerandreaboyd 371riskfactorsfornonalbicanscandidalvulvovaginitis
AT fortinchelsea 371riskfactorsfornonalbicanscandidalvulvovaginitis
AT radevamilena 371riskfactorsfornonalbicanscandidalvulvovaginitis
AT gojeoluwatosin 371riskfactorsfornonalbicanscandidalvulvovaginitis