Cargando…

176. Comparison of Prescribing Practices for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Among Outpatient Versus Emergency Department Settings

BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are the most common prescription drugs given to children, yet inappropriate usage is common. This study compared antibiotic prescribing practices for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh (CHP) Emergency Department (ED) vs. outpatient pra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koenig, Leah, Martin, Judith M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253344/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.189
_version_ 1783373477446680576
author Koenig, Leah
Martin, Judith M
author_facet Koenig, Leah
Martin, Judith M
author_sort Koenig, Leah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are the most common prescription drugs given to children, yet inappropriate usage is common. This study compared antibiotic prescribing practices for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh (CHP) Emergency Department (ED) vs. outpatient practices at sites affiliated with CHP. METHODS: We reviewed electronic medical records from November 2016 through April 2017 for patients ages 6–71 months who were diagnosed with CAP in the CHP ED and CHP-affiliated outpatient sites. Any healthy child with the appropriate ICD-10 code was included. The primary outcome measure was the prescribed antibiotic treatment. We compared children who received first-line CAP treatment, amoxicillin, per the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines, vs. second-line CAP treatments: amoxicillin–clavulanate and cefdinir. We collected any noted justifications for antibiotic choice and compared prescribing practices amongst provider types, including physicians, residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. The information was entered into a REDCap database. RESULTS: A total of 1,565 children were included; 52.6% were male, with a mean age of 2.99 years. Three hundred fifty-one of 1,565 (22.4%) were diagnosed in the ED. The prescriptions were as follows: amoxicillin (807/1,565, 51.6%), amoxicillin–clavulanate (231/1,565, 14.8%), cefdinir (156/1,565, 10.0%), azithromycin (270/1,565, 17.3%), combination therapy (47, 3.0%), and all others (54, 3.5%). In the ED, 232/351 (66.1%) children were prescribed amoxicillin, in contrast to 603/1,214 (49.7%) in the outpatient practices (P < 0.05). If clinicians did not prescribe first-line therapy, most commonly their reasoning was not provided (402/730, 55.1%). When noted, the most common reasons included: coverage for atypical organisms (115/730, 15.8%), drug allergy (106/730, 14.5%), and recent antibiotic use (55/730, 7.5%). CONCLUSION: Providers in the CHP ED were more likely to prescribe first-line therapy of amoxicillin as per IDSA guidelines than their outpatient practice counterparts. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62533442018-11-28 176. Comparison of Prescribing Practices for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Among Outpatient Versus Emergency Department Settings Koenig, Leah Martin, Judith M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antibiotics are the most common prescription drugs given to children, yet inappropriate usage is common. This study compared antibiotic prescribing practices for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh (CHP) Emergency Department (ED) vs. outpatient practices at sites affiliated with CHP. METHODS: We reviewed electronic medical records from November 2016 through April 2017 for patients ages 6–71 months who were diagnosed with CAP in the CHP ED and CHP-affiliated outpatient sites. Any healthy child with the appropriate ICD-10 code was included. The primary outcome measure was the prescribed antibiotic treatment. We compared children who received first-line CAP treatment, amoxicillin, per the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines, vs. second-line CAP treatments: amoxicillin–clavulanate and cefdinir. We collected any noted justifications for antibiotic choice and compared prescribing practices amongst provider types, including physicians, residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. The information was entered into a REDCap database. RESULTS: A total of 1,565 children were included; 52.6% were male, with a mean age of 2.99 years. Three hundred fifty-one of 1,565 (22.4%) were diagnosed in the ED. The prescriptions were as follows: amoxicillin (807/1,565, 51.6%), amoxicillin–clavulanate (231/1,565, 14.8%), cefdinir (156/1,565, 10.0%), azithromycin (270/1,565, 17.3%), combination therapy (47, 3.0%), and all others (54, 3.5%). In the ED, 232/351 (66.1%) children were prescribed amoxicillin, in contrast to 603/1,214 (49.7%) in the outpatient practices (P < 0.05). If clinicians did not prescribe first-line therapy, most commonly their reasoning was not provided (402/730, 55.1%). When noted, the most common reasons included: coverage for atypical organisms (115/730, 15.8%), drug allergy (106/730, 14.5%), and recent antibiotic use (55/730, 7.5%). CONCLUSION: Providers in the CHP ED were more likely to prescribe first-line therapy of amoxicillin as per IDSA guidelines than their outpatient practice counterparts. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253344/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.189 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Koenig, Leah
Martin, Judith M
176. Comparison of Prescribing Practices for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Among Outpatient Versus Emergency Department Settings
title 176. Comparison of Prescribing Practices for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Among Outpatient Versus Emergency Department Settings
title_full 176. Comparison of Prescribing Practices for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Among Outpatient Versus Emergency Department Settings
title_fullStr 176. Comparison of Prescribing Practices for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Among Outpatient Versus Emergency Department Settings
title_full_unstemmed 176. Comparison of Prescribing Practices for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Among Outpatient Versus Emergency Department Settings
title_short 176. Comparison of Prescribing Practices for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) Among Outpatient Versus Emergency Department Settings
title_sort 176. comparison of prescribing practices for community-acquired pneumonia (cap) among outpatient versus emergency department settings
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253344/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.189
work_keys_str_mv AT koenigleah 176comparisonofprescribingpracticesforcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapamongoutpatientversusemergencydepartmentsettings
AT martinjudithm 176comparisonofprescribingpracticesforcommunityacquiredpneumoniacapamongoutpatientversusemergencydepartmentsettings