Cargando…

1596. Thinking Locally: Can Unit-Specific Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening Augment Stewardship Interventions for Febrile Neutropenia?

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate IV vancomycin prescribing for febrile neutropenia (FN) is an excellent stewardship target given well-established guidelines specifying indications for its use. As a supplement to an educational initiative with institutional FN guidelines, we conducted methicillin-resistant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartash, Rachel, Ostrowsky, Belinda, Binder, Adam, Cowman, Kelsie, Sheridan, Carol, Guo, Yi, Levi, Michael, Szymczak, Wendy, Gialanella, Philip, Nori, Priya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253358/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1424
_version_ 1783373480747597824
author Bartash, Rachel
Ostrowsky, Belinda
Binder, Adam
Cowman, Kelsie
Sheridan, Carol
Guo, Yi
Levi, Michael
Szymczak, Wendy
Gialanella, Philip
Nori, Priya
author_facet Bartash, Rachel
Ostrowsky, Belinda
Binder, Adam
Cowman, Kelsie
Sheridan, Carol
Guo, Yi
Levi, Michael
Szymczak, Wendy
Gialanella, Philip
Nori, Priya
author_sort Bartash, Rachel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inappropriate IV vancomycin prescribing for febrile neutropenia (FN) is an excellent stewardship target given well-established guidelines specifying indications for its use. As a supplement to an educational initiative with institutional FN guidelines, we conducted methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization screening to estimate its prevalence on our hematology/oncology unit. We hypothesize that MRSA prevalence data can augment existing stewardship efforts to improve IV vancomycin use in FN. METHODS: (1) Pre-intervention: we conducted a retrospective chart review of vancomycin receipt for FN on a 32-bed Hematology/Oncology unit, November 2015–May 2016 (control group). (2) Intervention: in January 2017, we implemented an institutional FN guideline with recurring education to hematology/oncology providers emphasizing criteria for appropriate vancomycin initiation. Vancomycin audit was again conducted from February 2017–October 2017 (intervention group). The primary outcome was appropriateness of vancomycin use per guideline indications (chi-squared analysis). Use was considered inappropriate if no guideline indications were met. (3) MRSA screening: cultures were obtained from the nares, axilla and groin on admission and bimonthly for 6 weeks and plated on CHROMagar. Screened patients were followed for 5 months for the occurrence of clinical MRSA infection. RESULTS: Forty-three of 88 controls were started on vancomycin appropriately vs. 60 of 91 intervention group patients (49% vs. 66%, P = 0.02). Results of MRSA screening and follow-up for invasive infection are shown in Table 1. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Recurring, guideline-focused education can improve appropriateness of vancomycin for FN. High NPV in our study supports the hypothesis that MRSA screening can augment stewardship efforts to reduce vancomycin use when not indicated. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62533582018-11-28 1596. Thinking Locally: Can Unit-Specific Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening Augment Stewardship Interventions for Febrile Neutropenia? Bartash, Rachel Ostrowsky, Belinda Binder, Adam Cowman, Kelsie Sheridan, Carol Guo, Yi Levi, Michael Szymczak, Wendy Gialanella, Philip Nori, Priya Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Inappropriate IV vancomycin prescribing for febrile neutropenia (FN) is an excellent stewardship target given well-established guidelines specifying indications for its use. As a supplement to an educational initiative with institutional FN guidelines, we conducted methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization screening to estimate its prevalence on our hematology/oncology unit. We hypothesize that MRSA prevalence data can augment existing stewardship efforts to improve IV vancomycin use in FN. METHODS: (1) Pre-intervention: we conducted a retrospective chart review of vancomycin receipt for FN on a 32-bed Hematology/Oncology unit, November 2015–May 2016 (control group). (2) Intervention: in January 2017, we implemented an institutional FN guideline with recurring education to hematology/oncology providers emphasizing criteria for appropriate vancomycin initiation. Vancomycin audit was again conducted from February 2017–October 2017 (intervention group). The primary outcome was appropriateness of vancomycin use per guideline indications (chi-squared analysis). Use was considered inappropriate if no guideline indications were met. (3) MRSA screening: cultures were obtained from the nares, axilla and groin on admission and bimonthly for 6 weeks and plated on CHROMagar. Screened patients were followed for 5 months for the occurrence of clinical MRSA infection. RESULTS: Forty-three of 88 controls were started on vancomycin appropriately vs. 60 of 91 intervention group patients (49% vs. 66%, P = 0.02). Results of MRSA screening and follow-up for invasive infection are shown in Table 1. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Recurring, guideline-focused education can improve appropriateness of vancomycin for FN. High NPV in our study supports the hypothesis that MRSA screening can augment stewardship efforts to reduce vancomycin use when not indicated. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253358/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1424 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Bartash, Rachel
Ostrowsky, Belinda
Binder, Adam
Cowman, Kelsie
Sheridan, Carol
Guo, Yi
Levi, Michael
Szymczak, Wendy
Gialanella, Philip
Nori, Priya
1596. Thinking Locally: Can Unit-Specific Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening Augment Stewardship Interventions for Febrile Neutropenia?
title 1596. Thinking Locally: Can Unit-Specific Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening Augment Stewardship Interventions for Febrile Neutropenia?
title_full 1596. Thinking Locally: Can Unit-Specific Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening Augment Stewardship Interventions for Febrile Neutropenia?
title_fullStr 1596. Thinking Locally: Can Unit-Specific Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening Augment Stewardship Interventions for Febrile Neutropenia?
title_full_unstemmed 1596. Thinking Locally: Can Unit-Specific Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening Augment Stewardship Interventions for Febrile Neutropenia?
title_short 1596. Thinking Locally: Can Unit-Specific Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening Augment Stewardship Interventions for Febrile Neutropenia?
title_sort 1596. thinking locally: can unit-specific methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus screening augment stewardship interventions for febrile neutropenia?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253358/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1424
work_keys_str_mv AT bartashrachel 1596thinkinglocallycanunitspecificmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusscreeningaugmentstewardshipinterventionsforfebrileneutropenia
AT ostrowskybelinda 1596thinkinglocallycanunitspecificmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusscreeningaugmentstewardshipinterventionsforfebrileneutropenia
AT binderadam 1596thinkinglocallycanunitspecificmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusscreeningaugmentstewardshipinterventionsforfebrileneutropenia
AT cowmankelsie 1596thinkinglocallycanunitspecificmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusscreeningaugmentstewardshipinterventionsforfebrileneutropenia
AT sheridancarol 1596thinkinglocallycanunitspecificmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusscreeningaugmentstewardshipinterventionsforfebrileneutropenia
AT guoyi 1596thinkinglocallycanunitspecificmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusscreeningaugmentstewardshipinterventionsforfebrileneutropenia
AT levimichael 1596thinkinglocallycanunitspecificmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusscreeningaugmentstewardshipinterventionsforfebrileneutropenia
AT szymczakwendy 1596thinkinglocallycanunitspecificmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusscreeningaugmentstewardshipinterventionsforfebrileneutropenia
AT gialanellaphilip 1596thinkinglocallycanunitspecificmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusscreeningaugmentstewardshipinterventionsforfebrileneutropenia
AT noripriya 1596thinkinglocallycanunitspecificmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusscreeningaugmentstewardshipinterventionsforfebrileneutropenia