Cargando…

1788. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Testing Among Patients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Reported Penicillin Allergy

BACKGROUND: Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia is a highly lethal infection; first-line therapy with a β-lactam, commonly cefazolin, provides a significant mortality benefit over the second-line therapy, vancomycin, which is often used in patients reporting β-lactam allerg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaisman, Alon, Chambers, Henry F, Winston, Lisa G, Kazi, Dhruv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253399/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1444
_version_ 1783373485183074304
author Vaisman, Alon
Chambers, Henry F
Winston, Lisa G
Kazi, Dhruv
author_facet Vaisman, Alon
Chambers, Henry F
Winston, Lisa G
Kazi, Dhruv
author_sort Vaisman, Alon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia is a highly lethal infection; first-line therapy with a β-lactam, commonly cefazolin, provides a significant mortality benefit over the second-line therapy, vancomycin, which is often used in patients reporting β-lactam allergy. METHODS: We designed a simulation model of inpatients aged 55–75 years with MSSA bacteremia and a self-reported history of β-lactam allergy. The model adopted a US health-system perspective, a lifetime horizon, and a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). We compared routine care (vancomycin), history screening (questionnaire assessing anaphylaxis history), and bedside penicillin skin testing. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was measured using 2017 US dollars per QALY. Baseline co-morbid states (diabetes, malignancy, and end-stage renal disease [ESRD] requiring dialysis) were also modeled. Future costs and benefits were discounted at 3% per year. RESULTS: Among patients with MSSA bacteremia and a self-reported penicillin allergy, skin testing produced the best clinical outcomes and was cost-effective relative to history screening, generating 0.51 additional QALYs at an ICER of $22,062 per QALY gained. Among patients with diabetes, malignancy, or ESRD, the ICER for skin testing relative to history screening increased to $30,830–$127,182, reflecting the overall lower life expectancy and high annual survivor healthcare cost in these higher risk groups. Results were robust to wide variations in the cost and diagnostic performance of skin testing: in sensitivity analyses, skin testing remained the optimal strategy when cost was <$5600, specificity >60%, and sensitivity >10%. CONCLUSION: Among adults with MSSA bacteremia and a self-reported β-lactam allergy, skin testing is cost-effective relative to history screening and routine care at conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds and should be widely adopted given the mortality benefit of β-lactams over alternate antibiotics in MSSA bacteremia. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62533992018-11-28 1788. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Testing Among Patients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Reported Penicillin Allergy Vaisman, Alon Chambers, Henry F Winston, Lisa G Kazi, Dhruv Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia is a highly lethal infection; first-line therapy with a β-lactam, commonly cefazolin, provides a significant mortality benefit over the second-line therapy, vancomycin, which is often used in patients reporting β-lactam allergy. METHODS: We designed a simulation model of inpatients aged 55–75 years with MSSA bacteremia and a self-reported history of β-lactam allergy. The model adopted a US health-system perspective, a lifetime horizon, and a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). We compared routine care (vancomycin), history screening (questionnaire assessing anaphylaxis history), and bedside penicillin skin testing. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was measured using 2017 US dollars per QALY. Baseline co-morbid states (diabetes, malignancy, and end-stage renal disease [ESRD] requiring dialysis) were also modeled. Future costs and benefits were discounted at 3% per year. RESULTS: Among patients with MSSA bacteremia and a self-reported penicillin allergy, skin testing produced the best clinical outcomes and was cost-effective relative to history screening, generating 0.51 additional QALYs at an ICER of $22,062 per QALY gained. Among patients with diabetes, malignancy, or ESRD, the ICER for skin testing relative to history screening increased to $30,830–$127,182, reflecting the overall lower life expectancy and high annual survivor healthcare cost in these higher risk groups. Results were robust to wide variations in the cost and diagnostic performance of skin testing: in sensitivity analyses, skin testing remained the optimal strategy when cost was <$5600, specificity >60%, and sensitivity >10%. CONCLUSION: Among adults with MSSA bacteremia and a self-reported β-lactam allergy, skin testing is cost-effective relative to history screening and routine care at conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds and should be widely adopted given the mortality benefit of β-lactams over alternate antibiotics in MSSA bacteremia. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253399/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1444 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Vaisman, Alon
Chambers, Henry F
Winston, Lisa G
Kazi, Dhruv
1788. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Testing Among Patients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Reported Penicillin Allergy
title 1788. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Testing Among Patients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Reported Penicillin Allergy
title_full 1788. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Testing Among Patients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Reported Penicillin Allergy
title_fullStr 1788. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Testing Among Patients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Reported Penicillin Allergy
title_full_unstemmed 1788. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Testing Among Patients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Reported Penicillin Allergy
title_short 1788. Cost-Effectiveness of Penicillin Skin Testing Among Patients With Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Reported Penicillin Allergy
title_sort 1788. cost-effectiveness of penicillin skin testing among patients with methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and reported penicillin allergy
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253399/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1444
work_keys_str_mv AT vaismanalon 1788costeffectivenessofpenicillinskintestingamongpatientswithmethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandreportedpenicillinallergy
AT chambershenryf 1788costeffectivenessofpenicillinskintestingamongpatientswithmethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandreportedpenicillinallergy
AT winstonlisag 1788costeffectivenessofpenicillinskintestingamongpatientswithmethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandreportedpenicillinallergy
AT kazidhruv 1788costeffectivenessofpenicillinskintestingamongpatientswithmethicillinsensitivestaphylococcusaureusbacteremiaandreportedpenicillinallergy