Cargando…
1998. Urine Culture Incubation Time: One vs. 2 Days!
BACKGROUND: One day incubation time for non-invasive urine cultures makes the lab operation and work flow more efficient. However, it has been a matter of debate since striking a balance between potential loss of slow-growing pathogenic organisms weighs heavily over shorter incubation time. Our stud...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253415/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1654 |
_version_ | 1783373488953753600 |
---|---|
author | Noorbakhsh, Mir H |
author_facet | Noorbakhsh, Mir H |
author_sort | Noorbakhsh, Mir H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: One day incubation time for non-invasive urine cultures makes the lab operation and work flow more efficient. However, it has been a matter of debate since striking a balance between potential loss of slow-growing pathogenic organisms weighs heavily over shorter incubation time. Our study at Sutter Health Shared Laboratory (SHSL) evaluated the possibility of significant loss of uropathogens, if cultures incubated for only one day in CO2 and examined using a benchtop magnifier, and compared it with 2 days incubation. METHODS: Only routinely collected urine cultures has been included in this study and invasive collection such as nephrostomy, straight or diagnostic catheter collection were excluded. SHSL urine culture procedure defines the workup cut off for uropathognic organisms in a routine culture as 10,000 CFU/mL. Total of 2,709 urine specimens were processed using WASP automated plating system. 1 µL sterile loops were used to inoculate BAP/MAC bi-plates. Plates were incubated in 5% CO(2) at 35⁰C for at least 18 hours and maximum 24 hours for the first day evaluation. All no-growth plates were examined with a regular bench top magnifier/light for evidence of growth, and if verified, they were incubated for an extra day of incubation. Organism identifications performed by Vitek MS instrument. RESULTS: Total of 501 out of 2,709 samples were determined No-Growth on the first day examination, and after second day of incubation 435 stayed as No-Growth (86.8%), 66 samples (13.2%) indicate growth of normal Uro-Genital (UG) microbiota, and no uropathognic organisms detected. Among those with growth 54 (10.8%) samples grew <10K, 10 samples (2.0%) grew 10-50K, and 2 samples (0.4% [95% CI= 0.1% - 1.5%]) grew >50K CFU/mL of normal UG microbiota. CONCLUSION: Although small percentage with low level urogenital microbiota was missed on the first day of incubation, there were no uropathogenic organisms missed. Therefore, the 1-day incubation of routine urine culture plates in CO(2), and careful examination of the plates appeared to have same efficiency of 2-day incubation in pathogen detection. One-day incubation can result in workflow efficiency, significant saving in labor and incubation space for large volume laboratories, or laboratories with total microbiology automation. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6253415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62534152018-11-28 1998. Urine Culture Incubation Time: One vs. 2 Days! Noorbakhsh, Mir H Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: One day incubation time for non-invasive urine cultures makes the lab operation and work flow more efficient. However, it has been a matter of debate since striking a balance between potential loss of slow-growing pathogenic organisms weighs heavily over shorter incubation time. Our study at Sutter Health Shared Laboratory (SHSL) evaluated the possibility of significant loss of uropathogens, if cultures incubated for only one day in CO2 and examined using a benchtop magnifier, and compared it with 2 days incubation. METHODS: Only routinely collected urine cultures has been included in this study and invasive collection such as nephrostomy, straight or diagnostic catheter collection were excluded. SHSL urine culture procedure defines the workup cut off for uropathognic organisms in a routine culture as 10,000 CFU/mL. Total of 2,709 urine specimens were processed using WASP automated plating system. 1 µL sterile loops were used to inoculate BAP/MAC bi-plates. Plates were incubated in 5% CO(2) at 35⁰C for at least 18 hours and maximum 24 hours for the first day evaluation. All no-growth plates were examined with a regular bench top magnifier/light for evidence of growth, and if verified, they were incubated for an extra day of incubation. Organism identifications performed by Vitek MS instrument. RESULTS: Total of 501 out of 2,709 samples were determined No-Growth on the first day examination, and after second day of incubation 435 stayed as No-Growth (86.8%), 66 samples (13.2%) indicate growth of normal Uro-Genital (UG) microbiota, and no uropathognic organisms detected. Among those with growth 54 (10.8%) samples grew <10K, 10 samples (2.0%) grew 10-50K, and 2 samples (0.4% [95% CI= 0.1% - 1.5%]) grew >50K CFU/mL of normal UG microbiota. CONCLUSION: Although small percentage with low level urogenital microbiota was missed on the first day of incubation, there were no uropathogenic organisms missed. Therefore, the 1-day incubation of routine urine culture plates in CO(2), and careful examination of the plates appeared to have same efficiency of 2-day incubation in pathogen detection. One-day incubation can result in workflow efficiency, significant saving in labor and incubation space for large volume laboratories, or laboratories with total microbiology automation. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253415/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1654 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Noorbakhsh, Mir H 1998. Urine Culture Incubation Time: One vs. 2 Days! |
title | 1998. Urine Culture Incubation Time: One vs. 2 Days! |
title_full | 1998. Urine Culture Incubation Time: One vs. 2 Days! |
title_fullStr | 1998. Urine Culture Incubation Time: One vs. 2 Days! |
title_full_unstemmed | 1998. Urine Culture Incubation Time: One vs. 2 Days! |
title_short | 1998. Urine Culture Incubation Time: One vs. 2 Days! |
title_sort | 1998. urine culture incubation time: one vs. 2 days! |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253415/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1654 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noorbakhshmirh 1998urinecultureincubationtimeonevs2days |