Cargando…

2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017

BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin is among the limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. Despite its use, prevalence of fosfomycin resistance among CRE in the United States is largely unknown. In 2017, submission of Enterobacteriaceae isolates resistant to ≥1 carba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Snayd, Mary, Leung, Vivian, Maloney, Meghan, Durante, Amanda, Macierowski, Bobbie, Noel, Diane, Muyombwe, Anthony, Razeq, Jafar, Banach, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253430/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2049
_version_ 1783373492548272128
author Snayd, Mary
Leung, Vivian
Maloney, Meghan
Durante, Amanda
Macierowski, Bobbie
Noel, Diane
Muyombwe, Anthony
Razeq, Jafar
Banach, David
author_facet Snayd, Mary
Leung, Vivian
Maloney, Meghan
Durante, Amanda
Macierowski, Bobbie
Noel, Diane
Muyombwe, Anthony
Razeq, Jafar
Banach, David
author_sort Snayd, Mary
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin is among the limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. Despite its use, prevalence of fosfomycin resistance among CRE in the United States is largely unknown. In 2017, submission of Enterobacteriaceae isolates resistant to ≥1 carbapenem became mandated in Connecticut (CT), allowing further characterization at the state public health laboratory (SPHL). We analyzed fosfomycin resistance among CRE isolates in CT during 2017, and explored demographic and molecular factors potentially associated with resistance. METHODS: After confirming carbapenem resistance, SPHL tests fosfomycin susceptibility using disk diffusion. For each CRE patient, the isolate most resistant to fosfomycin was included in this analysis. We used the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) fosfomycin breakpoint for Escherichia coli (nonsusceptible <16 mm) to evaluate associations among fosfomycin resistance and demographic factors, carbapenemase activity (modified carbapenem inactivation method, mCIM) and carbapenemase genes tested at SPHL. We report fosfomycin resistance rate by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST, resistance <24 mm for E. coli) criteria for comparison. RESULTS: Among 138 CRE isolates, 39 (28.3%) were fosfomycin nonsusceptible by CLSI criteria. Most nonsusceptible isolates were Enterobacter cloacae (18; 46.2%) or Klebsiella pneumoniae (17; 43.6%). Isolates from patients aged ≥65 years were more likely to be fosfomycin nonsusceptible than isolates from patients aged <65 years (χ(2) = 3.8; P = 0.050). No other demographic characteristics were statistically significant. Of fosfomycin nonsusceptible isolates, 12 (30.8%) produced a carbapenemase (mCIM-positive), and 9 (23.1%) had the bla(KPC) gene. By EUCAST criteria, 96 (69.6%) CRE isolates were fosfomycin resistant. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of CRE in CT during 2017 were fosfomycin nonsusceptible, and nonsusceptibility was associated with older patient age. Fosfomycin resistance risk factors and molecular mechanisms need further exploration. The substantial proportion of isolates with results falling between CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints warrants evaluation. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253430
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62534302018-11-28 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017 Snayd, Mary Leung, Vivian Maloney, Meghan Durante, Amanda Macierowski, Bobbie Noel, Diane Muyombwe, Anthony Razeq, Jafar Banach, David Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin is among the limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. Despite its use, prevalence of fosfomycin resistance among CRE in the United States is largely unknown. In 2017, submission of Enterobacteriaceae isolates resistant to ≥1 carbapenem became mandated in Connecticut (CT), allowing further characterization at the state public health laboratory (SPHL). We analyzed fosfomycin resistance among CRE isolates in CT during 2017, and explored demographic and molecular factors potentially associated with resistance. METHODS: After confirming carbapenem resistance, SPHL tests fosfomycin susceptibility using disk diffusion. For each CRE patient, the isolate most resistant to fosfomycin was included in this analysis. We used the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) fosfomycin breakpoint for Escherichia coli (nonsusceptible <16 mm) to evaluate associations among fosfomycin resistance and demographic factors, carbapenemase activity (modified carbapenem inactivation method, mCIM) and carbapenemase genes tested at SPHL. We report fosfomycin resistance rate by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST, resistance <24 mm for E. coli) criteria for comparison. RESULTS: Among 138 CRE isolates, 39 (28.3%) were fosfomycin nonsusceptible by CLSI criteria. Most nonsusceptible isolates were Enterobacter cloacae (18; 46.2%) or Klebsiella pneumoniae (17; 43.6%). Isolates from patients aged ≥65 years were more likely to be fosfomycin nonsusceptible than isolates from patients aged <65 years (χ(2) = 3.8; P = 0.050). No other demographic characteristics were statistically significant. Of fosfomycin nonsusceptible isolates, 12 (30.8%) produced a carbapenemase (mCIM-positive), and 9 (23.1%) had the bla(KPC) gene. By EUCAST criteria, 96 (69.6%) CRE isolates were fosfomycin resistant. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of CRE in CT during 2017 were fosfomycin nonsusceptible, and nonsusceptibility was associated with older patient age. Fosfomycin resistance risk factors and molecular mechanisms need further exploration. The substantial proportion of isolates with results falling between CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints warrants evaluation. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253430/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2049 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Snayd, Mary
Leung, Vivian
Maloney, Meghan
Durante, Amanda
Macierowski, Bobbie
Noel, Diane
Muyombwe, Anthony
Razeq, Jafar
Banach, David
2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017
title 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017
title_full 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017
title_fullStr 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017
title_full_unstemmed 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017
title_short 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017
title_sort 2396. fosfomycin resistance among carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates in connecticut, 2017
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253430/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2049
work_keys_str_mv AT snaydmary 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017
AT leungvivian 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017
AT maloneymeghan 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017
AT duranteamanda 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017
AT macierowskibobbie 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017
AT noeldiane 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017
AT muyombweanthony 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017
AT razeqjafar 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017
AT banachdavid 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017