Cargando…
2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017
BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin is among the limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. Despite its use, prevalence of fosfomycin resistance among CRE in the United States is largely unknown. In 2017, submission of Enterobacteriaceae isolates resistant to ≥1 carba...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253430/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2049 |
_version_ | 1783373492548272128 |
---|---|
author | Snayd, Mary Leung, Vivian Maloney, Meghan Durante, Amanda Macierowski, Bobbie Noel, Diane Muyombwe, Anthony Razeq, Jafar Banach, David |
author_facet | Snayd, Mary Leung, Vivian Maloney, Meghan Durante, Amanda Macierowski, Bobbie Noel, Diane Muyombwe, Anthony Razeq, Jafar Banach, David |
author_sort | Snayd, Mary |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin is among the limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. Despite its use, prevalence of fosfomycin resistance among CRE in the United States is largely unknown. In 2017, submission of Enterobacteriaceae isolates resistant to ≥1 carbapenem became mandated in Connecticut (CT), allowing further characterization at the state public health laboratory (SPHL). We analyzed fosfomycin resistance among CRE isolates in CT during 2017, and explored demographic and molecular factors potentially associated with resistance. METHODS: After confirming carbapenem resistance, SPHL tests fosfomycin susceptibility using disk diffusion. For each CRE patient, the isolate most resistant to fosfomycin was included in this analysis. We used the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) fosfomycin breakpoint for Escherichia coli (nonsusceptible <16 mm) to evaluate associations among fosfomycin resistance and demographic factors, carbapenemase activity (modified carbapenem inactivation method, mCIM) and carbapenemase genes tested at SPHL. We report fosfomycin resistance rate by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST, resistance <24 mm for E. coli) criteria for comparison. RESULTS: Among 138 CRE isolates, 39 (28.3%) were fosfomycin nonsusceptible by CLSI criteria. Most nonsusceptible isolates were Enterobacter cloacae (18; 46.2%) or Klebsiella pneumoniae (17; 43.6%). Isolates from patients aged ≥65 years were more likely to be fosfomycin nonsusceptible than isolates from patients aged <65 years (χ(2) = 3.8; P = 0.050). No other demographic characteristics were statistically significant. Of fosfomycin nonsusceptible isolates, 12 (30.8%) produced a carbapenemase (mCIM-positive), and 9 (23.1%) had the bla(KPC) gene. By EUCAST criteria, 96 (69.6%) CRE isolates were fosfomycin resistant. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of CRE in CT during 2017 were fosfomycin nonsusceptible, and nonsusceptibility was associated with older patient age. Fosfomycin resistance risk factors and molecular mechanisms need further exploration. The substantial proportion of isolates with results falling between CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints warrants evaluation. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6253430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62534302018-11-28 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017 Snayd, Mary Leung, Vivian Maloney, Meghan Durante, Amanda Macierowski, Bobbie Noel, Diane Muyombwe, Anthony Razeq, Jafar Banach, David Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin is among the limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. Despite its use, prevalence of fosfomycin resistance among CRE in the United States is largely unknown. In 2017, submission of Enterobacteriaceae isolates resistant to ≥1 carbapenem became mandated in Connecticut (CT), allowing further characterization at the state public health laboratory (SPHL). We analyzed fosfomycin resistance among CRE isolates in CT during 2017, and explored demographic and molecular factors potentially associated with resistance. METHODS: After confirming carbapenem resistance, SPHL tests fosfomycin susceptibility using disk diffusion. For each CRE patient, the isolate most resistant to fosfomycin was included in this analysis. We used the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) fosfomycin breakpoint for Escherichia coli (nonsusceptible <16 mm) to evaluate associations among fosfomycin resistance and demographic factors, carbapenemase activity (modified carbapenem inactivation method, mCIM) and carbapenemase genes tested at SPHL. We report fosfomycin resistance rate by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST, resistance <24 mm for E. coli) criteria for comparison. RESULTS: Among 138 CRE isolates, 39 (28.3%) were fosfomycin nonsusceptible by CLSI criteria. Most nonsusceptible isolates were Enterobacter cloacae (18; 46.2%) or Klebsiella pneumoniae (17; 43.6%). Isolates from patients aged ≥65 years were more likely to be fosfomycin nonsusceptible than isolates from patients aged <65 years (χ(2) = 3.8; P = 0.050). No other demographic characteristics were statistically significant. Of fosfomycin nonsusceptible isolates, 12 (30.8%) produced a carbapenemase (mCIM-positive), and 9 (23.1%) had the bla(KPC) gene. By EUCAST criteria, 96 (69.6%) CRE isolates were fosfomycin resistant. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of CRE in CT during 2017 were fosfomycin nonsusceptible, and nonsusceptibility was associated with older patient age. Fosfomycin resistance risk factors and molecular mechanisms need further exploration. The substantial proportion of isolates with results falling between CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints warrants evaluation. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253430/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2049 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Snayd, Mary Leung, Vivian Maloney, Meghan Durante, Amanda Macierowski, Bobbie Noel, Diane Muyombwe, Anthony Razeq, Jafar Banach, David 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017 |
title | 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017 |
title_full | 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017 |
title_fullStr | 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017 |
title_full_unstemmed | 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017 |
title_short | 2396. Fosfomycin Resistance Among Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Clinical Isolates in Connecticut, 2017 |
title_sort | 2396. fosfomycin resistance among carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates in connecticut, 2017 |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253430/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2049 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT snaydmary 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017 AT leungvivian 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017 AT maloneymeghan 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017 AT duranteamanda 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017 AT macierowskibobbie 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017 AT noeldiane 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017 AT muyombweanthony 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017 AT razeqjafar 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017 AT banachdavid 2396fosfomycinresistanceamongcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceaeclinicalisolatesinconnecticut2017 |