Cargando…

2419. Standard vs. Alternative Therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: Focus on Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole, Minocycline, and Moxifloxacin Monotherapy

BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative bacilli associated with nosocomial infections. TMP-SMX is often considered the first-line agent; however, use may be limited due to adverse effects or resistance. Both minocycline and moxifloxacin have historically been used based on in vit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badwal, Jasmin, Traugott, Kristi, Hand, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253448/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2072
_version_ 1783373496980602880
author Badwal, Jasmin
Traugott, Kristi
Hand, Elizabeth
author_facet Badwal, Jasmin
Traugott, Kristi
Hand, Elizabeth
author_sort Badwal, Jasmin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative bacilli associated with nosocomial infections. TMP-SMX is often considered the first-line agent; however, use may be limited due to adverse effects or resistance. Both minocycline and moxifloxacin have historically been used based on in vitro data; however, there are limited studies assessing clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of TMP-SMX, minocycline, or moxifloxacin monotherapy for treatment of S. maltophilia infections. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review from January 2006 to September 2017. Subjects were selected by cross-referencing pharmacy billing and culture data. Patients ≥18 years of age were included if they had isolated S. maltophilia in at least one culture and were treated for at least five days. Patients were excluded due to pregnancy, incarceration, cystic fibrosis, receipt of combination therapy, or having prior case of treated S. maltophilia infection. Complete success was defined as meeting all three of the following: (1) resolution of signs/symptoms, (2) no repeat isolation 30 days after end of therapy, and (3) no switch or addition of alternative agents that cover S. maltophilia. Partial success was defined as meeting at least two out of the three criteria. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included in this study. No statistically significant difference in complete clinical success achievement was identified: TMP-SMX 14/32 (43.8%) vs. minocycline 17/37 (45.9%) vs. moxifloxacin 16/40 (40%), P = 0.8674. There was also no significant difference when including those that achieved partial clinical success: TMP-SMX 29/32 (90.6%) vs. minocycline 35/37 (94.6%) vs. moxifloxacin 34/40 (85%), P = 0.3724. Moxifloxacin use was associated with a significantly longer median LOS of 41.5 days compared with 24.5 days for TMP-SMX and 10 days for minocycline (P = 0.0340). Resistance development within 30 days post-treatment only occurred in 4 patients who received moxifloxacin (P = 0.0258). There was no difference in mortality nor treatment duration. CONCLUSION: Clinical success achievement was found to be similar in patients treated with TMP-SMX, minocycline, or moxifloxacin monotherapy for S. maltophilia infections. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62534482018-11-28 2419. Standard vs. Alternative Therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: Focus on Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole, Minocycline, and Moxifloxacin Monotherapy Badwal, Jasmin Traugott, Kristi Hand, Elizabeth Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative bacilli associated with nosocomial infections. TMP-SMX is often considered the first-line agent; however, use may be limited due to adverse effects or resistance. Both minocycline and moxifloxacin have historically been used based on in vitro data; however, there are limited studies assessing clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of TMP-SMX, minocycline, or moxifloxacin monotherapy for treatment of S. maltophilia infections. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review from January 2006 to September 2017. Subjects were selected by cross-referencing pharmacy billing and culture data. Patients ≥18 years of age were included if they had isolated S. maltophilia in at least one culture and were treated for at least five days. Patients were excluded due to pregnancy, incarceration, cystic fibrosis, receipt of combination therapy, or having prior case of treated S. maltophilia infection. Complete success was defined as meeting all three of the following: (1) resolution of signs/symptoms, (2) no repeat isolation 30 days after end of therapy, and (3) no switch or addition of alternative agents that cover S. maltophilia. Partial success was defined as meeting at least two out of the three criteria. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included in this study. No statistically significant difference in complete clinical success achievement was identified: TMP-SMX 14/32 (43.8%) vs. minocycline 17/37 (45.9%) vs. moxifloxacin 16/40 (40%), P = 0.8674. There was also no significant difference when including those that achieved partial clinical success: TMP-SMX 29/32 (90.6%) vs. minocycline 35/37 (94.6%) vs. moxifloxacin 34/40 (85%), P = 0.3724. Moxifloxacin use was associated with a significantly longer median LOS of 41.5 days compared with 24.5 days for TMP-SMX and 10 days for minocycline (P = 0.0340). Resistance development within 30 days post-treatment only occurred in 4 patients who received moxifloxacin (P = 0.0258). There was no difference in mortality nor treatment duration. CONCLUSION: Clinical success achievement was found to be similar in patients treated with TMP-SMX, minocycline, or moxifloxacin monotherapy for S. maltophilia infections. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253448/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2072 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Badwal, Jasmin
Traugott, Kristi
Hand, Elizabeth
2419. Standard vs. Alternative Therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: Focus on Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole, Minocycline, and Moxifloxacin Monotherapy
title 2419. Standard vs. Alternative Therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: Focus on Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole, Minocycline, and Moxifloxacin Monotherapy
title_full 2419. Standard vs. Alternative Therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: Focus on Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole, Minocycline, and Moxifloxacin Monotherapy
title_fullStr 2419. Standard vs. Alternative Therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: Focus on Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole, Minocycline, and Moxifloxacin Monotherapy
title_full_unstemmed 2419. Standard vs. Alternative Therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: Focus on Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole, Minocycline, and Moxifloxacin Monotherapy
title_short 2419. Standard vs. Alternative Therapy for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections: Focus on Trimethoprim–Sulfamethoxazole, Minocycline, and Moxifloxacin Monotherapy
title_sort 2419. standard vs. alternative therapy for stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: focus on trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole, minocycline, and moxifloxacin monotherapy
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253448/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2072
work_keys_str_mv AT badwaljasmin 2419standardvsalternativetherapyforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsfocusontrimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleminocyclineandmoxifloxacinmonotherapy
AT traugottkristi 2419standardvsalternativetherapyforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsfocusontrimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleminocyclineandmoxifloxacinmonotherapy
AT handelizabeth 2419standardvsalternativetherapyforstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfectionsfocusontrimethoprimsulfamethoxazoleminocyclineandmoxifloxacinmonotherapy