Cargando…

1879. A Point Prevalence Study of Antibiotic Utilization in 61 Geographically Diverse Acute Care Hospitals (2017)

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic utilization for geographically diverse areas can be difficult to obtain. The purpose of this study was to characterize patterns of US antibiotic use over a defined period to provide comparative data for benchmarking and to assist with identifying antibiotic stewardship opportu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuper, Kristi, Kinn, Patrick, Postelnick, Michael, Gibson, Amanda, Pakyz, Amy, Schulz, Lucas T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253506/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1535
_version_ 1783373510868992000
author Kuper, Kristi
Kinn, Patrick
Postelnick, Michael
Gibson, Amanda
Pakyz, Amy
Schulz, Lucas T
author_facet Kuper, Kristi
Kinn, Patrick
Postelnick, Michael
Gibson, Amanda
Pakyz, Amy
Schulz, Lucas T
author_sort Kuper, Kristi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antibiotic utilization for geographically diverse areas can be difficult to obtain. The purpose of this study was to characterize patterns of US antibiotic use over a defined period to provide comparative data for benchmarking and to assist with identifying antibiotic stewardship opportunities. METHODS: Data were obtained as part of a larger study evaluating antibiotic time out practices. Participating institutions submitted de-identified patient-level antibiotic use data from a single day (between October 16, 2017 and November 17, 2017). Indication, expected duration, and antibiotic stop dates were documented. Antibiotics were classified by American Hospital Formulary Service (AHFS) therapeutic category and evaluated to identify duplicate anti-anaerobic, anti-MRSA, and AHFS classes. Hospital teaching status and US Census region were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 6,184 courses of therapy (8,996 individual antibiotics) were evaluated from 61 hospitals. Sixty-four percent of therapy courses submitted were from academic medical centers. Distribution by census region was Midwest (44.7%), Northeast (15.11%), South (23.2%), and West (16.9%). Over half (53.7%) of therapy was empiric and 33.4% was directed. Sixty-six percent of courses did not include a stop date within the electronic medical record. Twelve drugs comprised 80% of total antibiotic use. Percentage of antipseudomonal use was similar across regions, but anti-MRSA therapy was higher in the South and Midwest. Duplicate β-lactam therapy and duplicate anti-anaerobe therapy were identified in 1.5% of total courses (each). Duplicate anti-MRSA therapy occurred in 0.29% of therapy courses. Three percent of patients developed a Clostridium difficile infection during their hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Vancomycin and piperacillin–tazobactam were the most common antibiotics used which is consistent with other analyses, but anti-anaerobic use as a percentage of overall use was higher than expected. Duplicate anti-anaerobe and β-lactam therapy is less frequent, but still represents an opportunity for stewardship. Antipseudomonal and anti-MRSA agents represent two key categories for stewardship given the high percentage of use. The addition of a stop date to the antibiotic order presents an opportunity to improve overall utilization. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62535062018-11-28 1879. A Point Prevalence Study of Antibiotic Utilization in 61 Geographically Diverse Acute Care Hospitals (2017) Kuper, Kristi Kinn, Patrick Postelnick, Michael Gibson, Amanda Pakyz, Amy Schulz, Lucas T Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antibiotic utilization for geographically diverse areas can be difficult to obtain. The purpose of this study was to characterize patterns of US antibiotic use over a defined period to provide comparative data for benchmarking and to assist with identifying antibiotic stewardship opportunities. METHODS: Data were obtained as part of a larger study evaluating antibiotic time out practices. Participating institutions submitted de-identified patient-level antibiotic use data from a single day (between October 16, 2017 and November 17, 2017). Indication, expected duration, and antibiotic stop dates were documented. Antibiotics were classified by American Hospital Formulary Service (AHFS) therapeutic category and evaluated to identify duplicate anti-anaerobic, anti-MRSA, and AHFS classes. Hospital teaching status and US Census region were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 6,184 courses of therapy (8,996 individual antibiotics) were evaluated from 61 hospitals. Sixty-four percent of therapy courses submitted were from academic medical centers. Distribution by census region was Midwest (44.7%), Northeast (15.11%), South (23.2%), and West (16.9%). Over half (53.7%) of therapy was empiric and 33.4% was directed. Sixty-six percent of courses did not include a stop date within the electronic medical record. Twelve drugs comprised 80% of total antibiotic use. Percentage of antipseudomonal use was similar across regions, but anti-MRSA therapy was higher in the South and Midwest. Duplicate β-lactam therapy and duplicate anti-anaerobe therapy were identified in 1.5% of total courses (each). Duplicate anti-MRSA therapy occurred in 0.29% of therapy courses. Three percent of patients developed a Clostridium difficile infection during their hospitalization. CONCLUSION: Vancomycin and piperacillin–tazobactam were the most common antibiotics used which is consistent with other analyses, but anti-anaerobic use as a percentage of overall use was higher than expected. Duplicate anti-anaerobe and β-lactam therapy is less frequent, but still represents an opportunity for stewardship. Antipseudomonal and anti-MRSA agents represent two key categories for stewardship given the high percentage of use. The addition of a stop date to the antibiotic order presents an opportunity to improve overall utilization. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253506/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1535 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Kuper, Kristi
Kinn, Patrick
Postelnick, Michael
Gibson, Amanda
Pakyz, Amy
Schulz, Lucas T
1879. A Point Prevalence Study of Antibiotic Utilization in 61 Geographically Diverse Acute Care Hospitals (2017)
title 1879. A Point Prevalence Study of Antibiotic Utilization in 61 Geographically Diverse Acute Care Hospitals (2017)
title_full 1879. A Point Prevalence Study of Antibiotic Utilization in 61 Geographically Diverse Acute Care Hospitals (2017)
title_fullStr 1879. A Point Prevalence Study of Antibiotic Utilization in 61 Geographically Diverse Acute Care Hospitals (2017)
title_full_unstemmed 1879. A Point Prevalence Study of Antibiotic Utilization in 61 Geographically Diverse Acute Care Hospitals (2017)
title_short 1879. A Point Prevalence Study of Antibiotic Utilization in 61 Geographically Diverse Acute Care Hospitals (2017)
title_sort 1879. a point prevalence study of antibiotic utilization in 61 geographically diverse acute care hospitals (2017)
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253506/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1535
work_keys_str_mv AT kuperkristi 1879apointprevalencestudyofantibioticutilizationin61geographicallydiverseacutecarehospitals2017
AT kinnpatrick 1879apointprevalencestudyofantibioticutilizationin61geographicallydiverseacutecarehospitals2017
AT postelnickmichael 1879apointprevalencestudyofantibioticutilizationin61geographicallydiverseacutecarehospitals2017
AT gibsonamanda 1879apointprevalencestudyofantibioticutilizationin61geographicallydiverseacutecarehospitals2017
AT pakyzamy 1879apointprevalencestudyofantibioticutilizationin61geographicallydiverseacutecarehospitals2017
AT schulzlucast 1879apointprevalencestudyofantibioticutilizationin61geographicallydiverseacutecarehospitals2017