Cargando…

2010. Volatile Organic Compounds Patterns in Breath, Plasma, and Stool in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection: A Cross-Sectional Proof of Concept Study

BACKGROUND: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are hydrocarbon compounds which are end product metabolites of physiological and pathophysiological processes. Many disease processes can be identified by examining metabolome patterns in clinical samples from patients. The purpose of this study was to i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: John, Teny Mathew, Shrestha, Nabin, Procop, Gary W, Grove, David, Leal, Sixto, Jacob, Ceena Neena, Butler, Robert, Dweik, Raed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253511/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1666
_version_ 1783373512026619904
author John, Teny Mathew
Shrestha, Nabin
Procop, Gary W
Grove, David
Leal, Sixto
Jacob, Ceena Neena
Butler, Robert
Dweik, Raed
author_facet John, Teny Mathew
Shrestha, Nabin
Procop, Gary W
Grove, David
Leal, Sixto
Jacob, Ceena Neena
Butler, Robert
Dweik, Raed
author_sort John, Teny Mathew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are hydrocarbon compounds which are end product metabolites of physiological and pathophysiological processes. Many disease processes can be identified by examining metabolome patterns in clinical samples from patients. The purpose of this study was to identify Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) based on differences in VOCs in stool, blood and breath of patients with CDI and controls without. METHODS: Patients aged >18 years at Cleveland Clinic with CDI (> 3 watery stools in the preceding 24 hours and stool PCR positive for C. difficile), and matched controls (for age, sex, and date of PCR test) were included. Stool and plasma samples (within 24 hours of collection) and fresh breath samples were collected. Headspace gas from clinical samples was tested using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) on a VOICE200 instrument (Syft Technologies Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand). The MS assay comprised of 22 common analytes: 2-propanol, acetaldehyde, acetone, acetonitrile, acrylonitrile, benzene, carbon disulfide, dimethyl sulfide, ethanol, isoprene, pentane, 1-decene, 1-heptene, 1-nonene, 1-octene, 3-methyl hexane, 2-nonene, ammonia, ethane, hydrogen sulfide, triethyl amine, and trimethyl amine. VOC analysis findings were classified as positive or negative using the K-nearest neighbors (KNN) method. Model accuracy was evaluated by k-fold cross-validation with 5-folds. Sensitivity and specificity were determined and receiver-operating characteristics curves generated for each sample type. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with CDI and 31 controls were studied. The optimal KNN classifier model was achieved with k = 7, 5, and 9, for breath, plasma, and stool samples, respectively. The sensitivity/specificity for detection of CDI were 87.1%/77.4%, 66.7%/63.6%, and 61.3%/36.4%, for breath, stool, and plasma samples, respectively. Model accuracy was no better if positives were limited to those with C. difficile PCR CT <30 cycles. CONCLUSION: VOC analysis of fresh breath, but not plasma or stool samples ≤24 hours old, by the method studied had good sensitivity and moderate specificity for identifying patients with CDI. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62535112018-11-28 2010. Volatile Organic Compounds Patterns in Breath, Plasma, and Stool in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection: A Cross-Sectional Proof of Concept Study John, Teny Mathew Shrestha, Nabin Procop, Gary W Grove, David Leal, Sixto Jacob, Ceena Neena Butler, Robert Dweik, Raed Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are hydrocarbon compounds which are end product metabolites of physiological and pathophysiological processes. Many disease processes can be identified by examining metabolome patterns in clinical samples from patients. The purpose of this study was to identify Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) based on differences in VOCs in stool, blood and breath of patients with CDI and controls without. METHODS: Patients aged >18 years at Cleveland Clinic with CDI (> 3 watery stools in the preceding 24 hours and stool PCR positive for C. difficile), and matched controls (for age, sex, and date of PCR test) were included. Stool and plasma samples (within 24 hours of collection) and fresh breath samples were collected. Headspace gas from clinical samples was tested using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) on a VOICE200 instrument (Syft Technologies Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand). The MS assay comprised of 22 common analytes: 2-propanol, acetaldehyde, acetone, acetonitrile, acrylonitrile, benzene, carbon disulfide, dimethyl sulfide, ethanol, isoprene, pentane, 1-decene, 1-heptene, 1-nonene, 1-octene, 3-methyl hexane, 2-nonene, ammonia, ethane, hydrogen sulfide, triethyl amine, and trimethyl amine. VOC analysis findings were classified as positive or negative using the K-nearest neighbors (KNN) method. Model accuracy was evaluated by k-fold cross-validation with 5-folds. Sensitivity and specificity were determined and receiver-operating characteristics curves generated for each sample type. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with CDI and 31 controls were studied. The optimal KNN classifier model was achieved with k = 7, 5, and 9, for breath, plasma, and stool samples, respectively. The sensitivity/specificity for detection of CDI were 87.1%/77.4%, 66.7%/63.6%, and 61.3%/36.4%, for breath, stool, and plasma samples, respectively. Model accuracy was no better if positives were limited to those with C. difficile PCR CT <30 cycles. CONCLUSION: VOC analysis of fresh breath, but not plasma or stool samples ≤24 hours old, by the method studied had good sensitivity and moderate specificity for identifying patients with CDI. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253511/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1666 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
John, Teny Mathew
Shrestha, Nabin
Procop, Gary W
Grove, David
Leal, Sixto
Jacob, Ceena Neena
Butler, Robert
Dweik, Raed
2010. Volatile Organic Compounds Patterns in Breath, Plasma, and Stool in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection: A Cross-Sectional Proof of Concept Study
title 2010. Volatile Organic Compounds Patterns in Breath, Plasma, and Stool in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection: A Cross-Sectional Proof of Concept Study
title_full 2010. Volatile Organic Compounds Patterns in Breath, Plasma, and Stool in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection: A Cross-Sectional Proof of Concept Study
title_fullStr 2010. Volatile Organic Compounds Patterns in Breath, Plasma, and Stool in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection: A Cross-Sectional Proof of Concept Study
title_full_unstemmed 2010. Volatile Organic Compounds Patterns in Breath, Plasma, and Stool in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection: A Cross-Sectional Proof of Concept Study
title_short 2010. Volatile Organic Compounds Patterns in Breath, Plasma, and Stool in Patients with Clostridium difficile Infection: A Cross-Sectional Proof of Concept Study
title_sort 2010. volatile organic compounds patterns in breath, plasma, and stool in patients with clostridium difficile infection: a cross-sectional proof of concept study
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253511/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1666
work_keys_str_mv AT johntenymathew 2010volatileorganiccompoundspatternsinbreathplasmaandstoolinpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectionacrosssectionalproofofconceptstudy
AT shresthanabin 2010volatileorganiccompoundspatternsinbreathplasmaandstoolinpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectionacrosssectionalproofofconceptstudy
AT procopgaryw 2010volatileorganiccompoundspatternsinbreathplasmaandstoolinpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectionacrosssectionalproofofconceptstudy
AT grovedavid 2010volatileorganiccompoundspatternsinbreathplasmaandstoolinpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectionacrosssectionalproofofconceptstudy
AT lealsixto 2010volatileorganiccompoundspatternsinbreathplasmaandstoolinpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectionacrosssectionalproofofconceptstudy
AT jacobceenaneena 2010volatileorganiccompoundspatternsinbreathplasmaandstoolinpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectionacrosssectionalproofofconceptstudy
AT butlerrobert 2010volatileorganiccompoundspatternsinbreathplasmaandstoolinpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectionacrosssectionalproofofconceptstudy
AT dweikraed 2010volatileorganiccompoundspatternsinbreathplasmaandstoolinpatientswithclostridiumdifficileinfectionacrosssectionalproofofconceptstudy