Cargando…

1425. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin in Critically Ill Trauma, Surgical, and Burn Patients

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic pharmacokinetics (PK) differ between critically ill and noncritically ill patients, as do the bacteria causing infection, yet dosing regimens are derived from noncritically ill populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the adequacy of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ivins-O’Keefe, Kelly, Akers, Kevin S, Schlotman, Taylor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253536/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1256
_version_ 1783373518026571776
author Ivins-O’Keefe, Kelly
Akers, Kevin S
Schlotman, Taylor
author_facet Ivins-O’Keefe, Kelly
Akers, Kevin S
Schlotman, Taylor
author_sort Ivins-O’Keefe, Kelly
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antibiotic pharmacokinetics (PK) differ between critically ill and noncritically ill patients, as do the bacteria causing infection, yet dosing regimens are derived from noncritically ill populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the adequacy of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin dosing in critically ill trauma, surgery, and burn patients for treating common nosocomial pathogens. METHODS: Time–concentration curves derived from plasma samples in critically ill patients receiving ciprofloxacin 400 mg IV q12h (N = 11) or q8h (N = 5) or levofloxacin 750 mg IV q24h (N = 9) were used to calculate individual PK parameters and create population PK models. Monte-Carlo simulations were performed to assess the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) to achieve the target pharmacodynamic index (PDI) of AUC:MIC ≥ 125, using Gram-negative MIC distributions from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. RESULTS: The fit of both the ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin population models was improved with the addition of CrCl as a covariate. Despite simulating higher dosing regimens, such as ciprofloxacin 600 mg q8h and 800 mg q8h and levofloxacin 1,125 mg q24h and 1,500 mg q24h, only a single dosing regimen/Gram-negative species combination demonstrated a CFR ≥90%. This result was consistent with the finding that the maximum MICs at which individual patients achieved the target PDI were well below the CLSI breakpoints of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin for Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter of ≤1 and ≤2 mg/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION: In critically ill trauma, surgical, and burn patients, standard dosing regimens of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin failed to achieve PDIs sufficient to treat optimally Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter isolates with MICs up to the CLSI breakpoints. When increased doses were simulated, the CFR of all but one dose/species combination remained suboptimal. Individualized dosing guided by therapeutic drug monitoring may be an appropriate next step to improve fluoroquinolone efficacy in these critically ill patients. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62535362018-11-28 1425. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin in Critically Ill Trauma, Surgical, and Burn Patients Ivins-O’Keefe, Kelly Akers, Kevin S Schlotman, Taylor Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antibiotic pharmacokinetics (PK) differ between critically ill and noncritically ill patients, as do the bacteria causing infection, yet dosing regimens are derived from noncritically ill populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the adequacy of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin dosing in critically ill trauma, surgery, and burn patients for treating common nosocomial pathogens. METHODS: Time–concentration curves derived from plasma samples in critically ill patients receiving ciprofloxacin 400 mg IV q12h (N = 11) or q8h (N = 5) or levofloxacin 750 mg IV q24h (N = 9) were used to calculate individual PK parameters and create population PK models. Monte-Carlo simulations were performed to assess the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) to achieve the target pharmacodynamic index (PDI) of AUC:MIC ≥ 125, using Gram-negative MIC distributions from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. RESULTS: The fit of both the ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin population models was improved with the addition of CrCl as a covariate. Despite simulating higher dosing regimens, such as ciprofloxacin 600 mg q8h and 800 mg q8h and levofloxacin 1,125 mg q24h and 1,500 mg q24h, only a single dosing regimen/Gram-negative species combination demonstrated a CFR ≥90%. This result was consistent with the finding that the maximum MICs at which individual patients achieved the target PDI were well below the CLSI breakpoints of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin for Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter of ≤1 and ≤2 mg/mL, respectively. CONCLUSION: In critically ill trauma, surgical, and burn patients, standard dosing regimens of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin failed to achieve PDIs sufficient to treat optimally Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter isolates with MICs up to the CLSI breakpoints. When increased doses were simulated, the CFR of all but one dose/species combination remained suboptimal. Individualized dosing guided by therapeutic drug monitoring may be an appropriate next step to improve fluoroquinolone efficacy in these critically ill patients. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253536/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1256 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Ivins-O’Keefe, Kelly
Akers, Kevin S
Schlotman, Taylor
1425. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin in Critically Ill Trauma, Surgical, and Burn Patients
title 1425. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin in Critically Ill Trauma, Surgical, and Burn Patients
title_full 1425. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin in Critically Ill Trauma, Surgical, and Burn Patients
title_fullStr 1425. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin in Critically Ill Trauma, Surgical, and Burn Patients
title_full_unstemmed 1425. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin in Critically Ill Trauma, Surgical, and Burn Patients
title_short 1425. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ciprofloxacin and Levofloxacin in Critically Ill Trauma, Surgical, and Burn Patients
title_sort 1425. population pharmacokinetic analysis of ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin in critically ill trauma, surgical, and burn patients
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253536/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1256
work_keys_str_mv AT ivinsokeefekelly 1425populationpharmacokineticanalysisofciprofloxacinandlevofloxacinincriticallyilltraumasurgicalandburnpatients
AT akerskevins 1425populationpharmacokineticanalysisofciprofloxacinandlevofloxacinincriticallyilltraumasurgicalandburnpatients
AT schlotmantaylor 1425populationpharmacokineticanalysisofciprofloxacinandlevofloxacinincriticallyilltraumasurgicalandburnpatients