Cargando…

1795. Safety Outcomes of the Use of β-Lactam Therapy in Patients With Documented β-Lactam Allergy

BACKGROUND: In patients with a true penicillin allergy, the reported cross-reactivity to cephalosporin and carbapenem antibiotics are approximately 3% and 1%, respectively. Although true β-lactam allergies are rare, providers are reluctant to challenge patients with other β-lactams, which significan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bjork, Lauren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253545/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1451
_version_ 1783373520137355264
author Bjork, Lauren
author_facet Bjork, Lauren
author_sort Bjork, Lauren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In patients with a true penicillin allergy, the reported cross-reactivity to cephalosporin and carbapenem antibiotics are approximately 3% and 1%, respectively. Although true β-lactam allergies are rare, providers are reluctant to challenge patients with other β-lactams, which significantly limits empiric treatment reigmens. This study aims to determine the safety outcomes of patients with a previously documented β-lactam allergy who were challenged with β-lactam therapy at a small community hospital in Brooklyn, New York. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all β-lactam allergic patients at Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center who received a β-lactam from January 2014 to July 2017. Patients were included if they were at least 18 years old with a documented β-lactam allergy upon admission and received at least one dose of a β-lactam antibiotic. Allergic reaction was determined by assessing both pharmacist and provider notes in the electronic health record. Orders for antihistamines, corticosteroids, and/or epinephrine in addition to the discontinuation of the β-lactam and provider documentation were considered an allergic reaction. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were analyzed with 36 not meeting inclusion criteria. Of the 72 patients included, two patients (2.78%) experienced an allergic reaction to a β-lactam. Both patients recovered within 72 hours without the use of epinephrine. One of the allergic reactions was attributed to ceftriaxone, while the other was attributed to cefepime. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were cefepime (34.7%), ceftriaxone (27.8%), and meropenem (15.3%). Eleven patients had a documented severe β-lactam allergy, one of which experienced a rash after receiving β-lactam therapy. None of the five patients with documented anaphylactic allergy experienced a reaction. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that there is a low risk of utilizing β-lactams in patients with a reported β-lactam allergy. The two observed allergic reactions were due to a third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin, which was unexpected as previous literature suggests higher cross-reactivity to the earlier generation cephalosporin antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62535452018-11-28 1795. Safety Outcomes of the Use of β-Lactam Therapy in Patients With Documented β-Lactam Allergy Bjork, Lauren Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: In patients with a true penicillin allergy, the reported cross-reactivity to cephalosporin and carbapenem antibiotics are approximately 3% and 1%, respectively. Although true β-lactam allergies are rare, providers are reluctant to challenge patients with other β-lactams, which significantly limits empiric treatment reigmens. This study aims to determine the safety outcomes of patients with a previously documented β-lactam allergy who were challenged with β-lactam therapy at a small community hospital in Brooklyn, New York. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all β-lactam allergic patients at Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center who received a β-lactam from January 2014 to July 2017. Patients were included if they were at least 18 years old with a documented β-lactam allergy upon admission and received at least one dose of a β-lactam antibiotic. Allergic reaction was determined by assessing both pharmacist and provider notes in the electronic health record. Orders for antihistamines, corticosteroids, and/or epinephrine in addition to the discontinuation of the β-lactam and provider documentation were considered an allergic reaction. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were analyzed with 36 not meeting inclusion criteria. Of the 72 patients included, two patients (2.78%) experienced an allergic reaction to a β-lactam. Both patients recovered within 72 hours without the use of epinephrine. One of the allergic reactions was attributed to ceftriaxone, while the other was attributed to cefepime. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were cefepime (34.7%), ceftriaxone (27.8%), and meropenem (15.3%). Eleven patients had a documented severe β-lactam allergy, one of which experienced a rash after receiving β-lactam therapy. None of the five patients with documented anaphylactic allergy experienced a reaction. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that there is a low risk of utilizing β-lactams in patients with a reported β-lactam allergy. The two observed allergic reactions were due to a third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin, which was unexpected as previous literature suggests higher cross-reactivity to the earlier generation cephalosporin antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253545/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1451 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Bjork, Lauren
1795. Safety Outcomes of the Use of β-Lactam Therapy in Patients With Documented β-Lactam Allergy
title 1795. Safety Outcomes of the Use of β-Lactam Therapy in Patients With Documented β-Lactam Allergy
title_full 1795. Safety Outcomes of the Use of β-Lactam Therapy in Patients With Documented β-Lactam Allergy
title_fullStr 1795. Safety Outcomes of the Use of β-Lactam Therapy in Patients With Documented β-Lactam Allergy
title_full_unstemmed 1795. Safety Outcomes of the Use of β-Lactam Therapy in Patients With Documented β-Lactam Allergy
title_short 1795. Safety Outcomes of the Use of β-Lactam Therapy in Patients With Documented β-Lactam Allergy
title_sort 1795. safety outcomes of the use of β-lactam therapy in patients with documented β-lactam allergy
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253545/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1451
work_keys_str_mv AT bjorklauren 1795safetyoutcomesoftheuseofblactamtherapyinpatientswithdocumentedblactamallergy