Cargando…

297. Risk Factors for Infections in Open Fractures

BACKGROUND: Open fractures are more prone to get infected. Known risk factors are high grade Gustilo and patients’ co-morbidities, while early antibiotic administration and surgical debridement decrease the risk of infection. There is little data regarding the preferred antimicrobial therapy, timing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reisfeld, Sharon, Labnawi, Islam, Shadmi, Nurit, Stein, Michal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253549/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.308
_version_ 1783373521094705152
author Reisfeld, Sharon
Labnawi, Islam
Shadmi, Nurit
Stein, Michal
author_facet Reisfeld, Sharon
Labnawi, Islam
Shadmi, Nurit
Stein, Michal
author_sort Reisfeld, Sharon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Open fractures are more prone to get infected. Known risk factors are high grade Gustilo and patients’ co-morbidities, while early antibiotic administration and surgical debridement decrease the risk of infection. There is little data regarding the preferred antimicrobial therapy, timing, and duration of treatment, especially in the era of antimicrobial resistance. The aim of our study was to compare patients with and without infections after open fractures, and identify risk factors for infections, including timing of antimicrobial first dose and its duration. METHODS: A historical cohort study was conducted in a secondary hospital. All adult patients admitted to the hospital with an open fracture of the limbs, between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016 were included in the study. Epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological data were collected and analyzed. Microbiological infection was defined by positive wound cultures during first 30 days, and clinical infection as defined by the treating physician. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients were included in the study. One hundred sixty patients (95%) were treated with a first generation cephalosporine, and 55 (33%) were also treated with aminoglycosides. Microbiological infection was identified in 12 (7%) patients, and clinical infection in 27 (16%) patients. All patients received the first dose of antimicrobial therapy within 15 hours of admission (median 1.29 hours). Early administration of the first dose of antimicrobial therapy did not reduce the risk of infection (median of 1.06 hours for patients who developed infection vs. 1.31 hours for patients that did not develop infection, P = 0.58). Duration of treatment was not correlated to the risk of infection (1–3 days vs. 4–7 days, P = 0.6). In multivariate logistic regression, only location of fracture in the lower limbs was associated with an increased risk of infection (OR 4.654, CI 1.407–15.398), and Gustilo grade 1 or 2 were associated with decreased risk of infection (OR 0.301, CI 0.104–0.872). CONCLUSION: In our cohort, neither early administration of antimicrobial therapy, nor prolonged duration of treatment, reduced the risk of infection in open fractures. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62535492018-11-28 297. Risk Factors for Infections in Open Fractures Reisfeld, Sharon Labnawi, Islam Shadmi, Nurit Stein, Michal Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Open fractures are more prone to get infected. Known risk factors are high grade Gustilo and patients’ co-morbidities, while early antibiotic administration and surgical debridement decrease the risk of infection. There is little data regarding the preferred antimicrobial therapy, timing, and duration of treatment, especially in the era of antimicrobial resistance. The aim of our study was to compare patients with and without infections after open fractures, and identify risk factors for infections, including timing of antimicrobial first dose and its duration. METHODS: A historical cohort study was conducted in a secondary hospital. All adult patients admitted to the hospital with an open fracture of the limbs, between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016 were included in the study. Epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological data were collected and analyzed. Microbiological infection was defined by positive wound cultures during first 30 days, and clinical infection as defined by the treating physician. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients were included in the study. One hundred sixty patients (95%) were treated with a first generation cephalosporine, and 55 (33%) were also treated with aminoglycosides. Microbiological infection was identified in 12 (7%) patients, and clinical infection in 27 (16%) patients. All patients received the first dose of antimicrobial therapy within 15 hours of admission (median 1.29 hours). Early administration of the first dose of antimicrobial therapy did not reduce the risk of infection (median of 1.06 hours for patients who developed infection vs. 1.31 hours for patients that did not develop infection, P = 0.58). Duration of treatment was not correlated to the risk of infection (1–3 days vs. 4–7 days, P = 0.6). In multivariate logistic regression, only location of fracture in the lower limbs was associated with an increased risk of infection (OR 4.654, CI 1.407–15.398), and Gustilo grade 1 or 2 were associated with decreased risk of infection (OR 0.301, CI 0.104–0.872). CONCLUSION: In our cohort, neither early administration of antimicrobial therapy, nor prolonged duration of treatment, reduced the risk of infection in open fractures. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253549/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.308 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Reisfeld, Sharon
Labnawi, Islam
Shadmi, Nurit
Stein, Michal
297. Risk Factors for Infections in Open Fractures
title 297. Risk Factors for Infections in Open Fractures
title_full 297. Risk Factors for Infections in Open Fractures
title_fullStr 297. Risk Factors for Infections in Open Fractures
title_full_unstemmed 297. Risk Factors for Infections in Open Fractures
title_short 297. Risk Factors for Infections in Open Fractures
title_sort 297. risk factors for infections in open fractures
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253549/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.308
work_keys_str_mv AT reisfeldsharon 297riskfactorsforinfectionsinopenfractures
AT labnawiislam 297riskfactorsforinfectionsinopenfractures
AT shadminurit 297riskfactorsforinfectionsinopenfractures
AT steinmichal 297riskfactorsforinfectionsinopenfractures