Cargando…

1914. Adherence to the Sepsis Bundle in Hospital-Onset vs. Community-Onset Sepsis

BACKGROUND: Every hour of delay between onset of sepsis and administration of the sepsis bundle increases sepsis mortality. Hospital-onset sepsis is known to have higher mortality than community-onset sepsis, but the differences in care between cases of hospital-onset and community-onset sepsis have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baghdadi, Jonathan, Uslan, Daniel Z, Bell, Douglas, Wong, Mitchell
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253552/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1570
_version_ 1783373521832902656
author Baghdadi, Jonathan
Uslan, Daniel Z
Bell, Douglas
Wong, Mitchell
author_facet Baghdadi, Jonathan
Uslan, Daniel Z
Bell, Douglas
Wong, Mitchell
author_sort Baghdadi, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Every hour of delay between onset of sepsis and administration of the sepsis bundle increases sepsis mortality. Hospital-onset sepsis is known to have higher mortality than community-onset sepsis, but the differences in care between cases of hospital-onset and community-onset sepsis have not been characterized. The purpose of this study was to examine adherence to the sepsis bundle when sepsis arises in different areas of the hospital (ward, intensive care unit [ICU], or peri-operative area) compared with community-onset sepsis. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using clinical data from four University of California hospitals. Admissions for sepsis from 2014 to 2016 were identified by diagnosis codes. Generalized linear models were used to estimate likelihood of adherence in terms of relative risk (RR). Time-to-event analysis involved Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan–Meier curves. RESULTS: Overall, the sepsis bundle was administered in accordance with guidelines in 11.1% of cases. On multivariable analysis, cases of hospital-onset sepsis were less likely to receive the sepsis bundle within the recommended time frame (adjusted RR 0.57, P < 0.001) than were cases of community-onset sepsis, including a lower likelihood of having blood cultures drawn (adjusted RR 0.75, P < 0.001), serum lactate checked (adjusted RR 0.48, P < 0.001), or broad-spectrum antibiotics administered within 3 hours (adjusted RR 0.65, P < 0.001). Among the cases of hospital-onset sepsis, those arising in the ICU were more likely than those arising on the ward or in the perioperative area to receive the sepsis bundle within the recommended time frame (RR 1.83, P = 0.002). On time-to-event analysis, hospital-onset was associated with significant delays for all 3-hour bundle components except intravenous fluids. CONCLUSION: Developing sepsis in one of the inpatient hospital areas was associated with a delay in guideline-adherent sepsis care. The ward and perioperative area experienced the longest delays. Further research is needed to determine whether these delays in care contribute to the increased mortality associated with hospital-onset sepsis. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62535522018-11-28 1914. Adherence to the Sepsis Bundle in Hospital-Onset vs. Community-Onset Sepsis Baghdadi, Jonathan Uslan, Daniel Z Bell, Douglas Wong, Mitchell Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Every hour of delay between onset of sepsis and administration of the sepsis bundle increases sepsis mortality. Hospital-onset sepsis is known to have higher mortality than community-onset sepsis, but the differences in care between cases of hospital-onset and community-onset sepsis have not been characterized. The purpose of this study was to examine adherence to the sepsis bundle when sepsis arises in different areas of the hospital (ward, intensive care unit [ICU], or peri-operative area) compared with community-onset sepsis. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using clinical data from four University of California hospitals. Admissions for sepsis from 2014 to 2016 were identified by diagnosis codes. Generalized linear models were used to estimate likelihood of adherence in terms of relative risk (RR). Time-to-event analysis involved Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan–Meier curves. RESULTS: Overall, the sepsis bundle was administered in accordance with guidelines in 11.1% of cases. On multivariable analysis, cases of hospital-onset sepsis were less likely to receive the sepsis bundle within the recommended time frame (adjusted RR 0.57, P < 0.001) than were cases of community-onset sepsis, including a lower likelihood of having blood cultures drawn (adjusted RR 0.75, P < 0.001), serum lactate checked (adjusted RR 0.48, P < 0.001), or broad-spectrum antibiotics administered within 3 hours (adjusted RR 0.65, P < 0.001). Among the cases of hospital-onset sepsis, those arising in the ICU were more likely than those arising on the ward or in the perioperative area to receive the sepsis bundle within the recommended time frame (RR 1.83, P = 0.002). On time-to-event analysis, hospital-onset was associated with significant delays for all 3-hour bundle components except intravenous fluids. CONCLUSION: Developing sepsis in one of the inpatient hospital areas was associated with a delay in guideline-adherent sepsis care. The ward and perioperative area experienced the longest delays. Further research is needed to determine whether these delays in care contribute to the increased mortality associated with hospital-onset sepsis. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253552/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1570 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Baghdadi, Jonathan
Uslan, Daniel Z
Bell, Douglas
Wong, Mitchell
1914. Adherence to the Sepsis Bundle in Hospital-Onset vs. Community-Onset Sepsis
title 1914. Adherence to the Sepsis Bundle in Hospital-Onset vs. Community-Onset Sepsis
title_full 1914. Adherence to the Sepsis Bundle in Hospital-Onset vs. Community-Onset Sepsis
title_fullStr 1914. Adherence to the Sepsis Bundle in Hospital-Onset vs. Community-Onset Sepsis
title_full_unstemmed 1914. Adherence to the Sepsis Bundle in Hospital-Onset vs. Community-Onset Sepsis
title_short 1914. Adherence to the Sepsis Bundle in Hospital-Onset vs. Community-Onset Sepsis
title_sort 1914. adherence to the sepsis bundle in hospital-onset vs. community-onset sepsis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253552/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1570
work_keys_str_mv AT baghdadijonathan 1914adherencetothesepsisbundleinhospitalonsetvscommunityonsetsepsis
AT uslandanielz 1914adherencetothesepsisbundleinhospitalonsetvscommunityonsetsepsis
AT belldouglas 1914adherencetothesepsisbundleinhospitalonsetvscommunityonsetsepsis
AT wongmitchell 1914adherencetothesepsisbundleinhospitalonsetvscommunityonsetsepsis