Cargando…

237. Antibiotic Assessment at Discharge-Room for Stewardship Intervention

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is minimal literature detailing the utility or approach to antibiotic stewardship interventions at the transition of care. We sought to evaluate the utility of a stewardship approach where appropriateness of choice and duration of oral antibiotics prescribed at the time...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Balasubramanian, Prakash, Lata, Paul, Peters, Meredith, Crnich, Christopher, Barnett, Susanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253575/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.248
_version_ 1783373527428104192
author Balasubramanian, Prakash
Lata, Paul
Peters, Meredith
Crnich, Christopher
Barnett, Susanne
author_facet Balasubramanian, Prakash
Lata, Paul
Peters, Meredith
Crnich, Christopher
Barnett, Susanne
author_sort Balasubramanian, Prakash
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, there is minimal literature detailing the utility or approach to antibiotic stewardship interventions at the transition of care. We sought to evaluate the utility of a stewardship approach where appropriateness of choice and duration of oral antibiotics prescribed at the time of discharge was assessed and, when indicated, recommendations for change provided. METHODS: Between June 2017 and April 2018, an antimicrobial stewardship team, comprising of a pharmacist and infectious disease provider, reviewed the electronic health record (EHR) of patients discharged on oral antibiotics from the Medical Service at the William S Middleton VA Hospital for appropriateness of antibiotic choice and total duration of therapy. Depending on availability of team members, reviews occurred twice weekly and included patients discharged within the previous 4 days. If an antibiotic was felt to be inappropriate, the case was discussed with the prescribing service and/or pharmacist. Recommendations were documented in the form of a note placed in the EHR with an emphasis on education. These interventions were logged and information regarding prescribing team/provider, antibiotic, indication, and type of intervention was collected. Intervention types included (but were not limited to) antibiotic stop, change of antibiotic, dose, or duration, and laboratory recommendations. RESULTS: Stewardship rounds evaluated 463 patients discharged on oral antibiotics from the Medical Service over 177 hospital days. Forty-one interventions were logged in 38 (8.2%) patients, i.e., approximately 1 intervention for every 12 patients discharged on oral antibiotics. The most common intervention type was antibiotic stop (49%), followed by a change in duration (15%). Interventions occurred most commonly in patients treated for COPD (27%), UTI (22%), and pneumonia (15%). Azithromycin (27%), cefpodoxime (12%), and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (12%) were the antibiotics most frequently intervened upon. CONCLUSION: Assessing postdischarge antibiotic therapy with feedback to prescribers is an additional area where Stewardship programs can focus to better optimize usage of antimicrobials. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62535752018-11-28 237. Antibiotic Assessment at Discharge-Room for Stewardship Intervention Balasubramanian, Prakash Lata, Paul Peters, Meredith Crnich, Christopher Barnett, Susanne Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Currently, there is minimal literature detailing the utility or approach to antibiotic stewardship interventions at the transition of care. We sought to evaluate the utility of a stewardship approach where appropriateness of choice and duration of oral antibiotics prescribed at the time of discharge was assessed and, when indicated, recommendations for change provided. METHODS: Between June 2017 and April 2018, an antimicrobial stewardship team, comprising of a pharmacist and infectious disease provider, reviewed the electronic health record (EHR) of patients discharged on oral antibiotics from the Medical Service at the William S Middleton VA Hospital for appropriateness of antibiotic choice and total duration of therapy. Depending on availability of team members, reviews occurred twice weekly and included patients discharged within the previous 4 days. If an antibiotic was felt to be inappropriate, the case was discussed with the prescribing service and/or pharmacist. Recommendations were documented in the form of a note placed in the EHR with an emphasis on education. These interventions were logged and information regarding prescribing team/provider, antibiotic, indication, and type of intervention was collected. Intervention types included (but were not limited to) antibiotic stop, change of antibiotic, dose, or duration, and laboratory recommendations. RESULTS: Stewardship rounds evaluated 463 patients discharged on oral antibiotics from the Medical Service over 177 hospital days. Forty-one interventions were logged in 38 (8.2%) patients, i.e., approximately 1 intervention for every 12 patients discharged on oral antibiotics. The most common intervention type was antibiotic stop (49%), followed by a change in duration (15%). Interventions occurred most commonly in patients treated for COPD (27%), UTI (22%), and pneumonia (15%). Azithromycin (27%), cefpodoxime (12%), and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (12%) were the antibiotics most frequently intervened upon. CONCLUSION: Assessing postdischarge antibiotic therapy with feedback to prescribers is an additional area where Stewardship programs can focus to better optimize usage of antimicrobials. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253575/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.248 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Balasubramanian, Prakash
Lata, Paul
Peters, Meredith
Crnich, Christopher
Barnett, Susanne
237. Antibiotic Assessment at Discharge-Room for Stewardship Intervention
title 237. Antibiotic Assessment at Discharge-Room for Stewardship Intervention
title_full 237. Antibiotic Assessment at Discharge-Room for Stewardship Intervention
title_fullStr 237. Antibiotic Assessment at Discharge-Room for Stewardship Intervention
title_full_unstemmed 237. Antibiotic Assessment at Discharge-Room for Stewardship Intervention
title_short 237. Antibiotic Assessment at Discharge-Room for Stewardship Intervention
title_sort 237. antibiotic assessment at discharge-room for stewardship intervention
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253575/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.248
work_keys_str_mv AT balasubramanianprakash 237antibioticassessmentatdischargeroomforstewardshipintervention
AT latapaul 237antibioticassessmentatdischargeroomforstewardshipintervention
AT petersmeredith 237antibioticassessmentatdischargeroomforstewardshipintervention
AT crnichchristopher 237antibioticassessmentatdischargeroomforstewardshipintervention
AT barnettsusanne 237antibioticassessmentatdischargeroomforstewardshipintervention