Cargando…

288. Expediting Discharge in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Clinical and Economic Comparison Between Vancomycin and Oritavancin

BACKGROUND: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) have a high economic burden secondary to prolonged hospitalizations and high rates of recurrent infections. Utilizing oritavancin rather than vancomycin, select inpatients may be discharged earlier in their hospitalization with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whittaker, Cristen, Nhan, Ethan, Ganapathiraju, Pavan, Garrett, Sandra, Reilly, Joseph, Trivedi, Manish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253589/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.299
_version_ 1783373530762575872
author Whittaker, Cristen
Nhan, Ethan
Ganapathiraju, Pavan
Garrett, Sandra
Reilly, Joseph
Trivedi, Manish
author_facet Whittaker, Cristen
Nhan, Ethan
Ganapathiraju, Pavan
Garrett, Sandra
Reilly, Joseph
Trivedi, Manish
author_sort Whittaker, Cristen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) have a high economic burden secondary to prolonged hospitalizations and high rates of recurrent infections. Utilizing oritavancin rather than vancomycin, select inpatients may be discharged earlier in their hospitalization with anticipated decreased infection recurrences and cost avoidance. METHODS: All inpatients administered oritavancin to expedite discharge and/or vancomycin for the treatment of ABSSSI between May 2017 and January 2018 were included in this retrospective evaluation. The primary endpoint was to determine the 30-day ABSSSI recurrence rate between treatment arms. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate financial expenditures associated with utilization of oritavancin when compared with vancomycin, and to assess for potential risk factors associated with poor outcomes. A financial analysis was performed for patients based on their DRG (diagnosis-related group) applying hospital-specific expenditures provided by the finance department. Data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test, χ(2) test, or t-test as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients receiving oritavancin and 50 patients receiving vancomycin were identified as meeting inclusion criteria. Nine of 50 patients (18%) returned for recurrent infections in the vancomycin arm while only 2 of 51 (4%) returned in the oritavancin arm (P = 0.0279). Out of the 11 patients with recurrent infections, 6 were current intravenous drug users (55%), 3 left against medical advice at their initial visit (27%) and 7 had an emergency department visit in the prior 30 days for the same infection (64%). Overall, there were 111.7 hospitalization days avoided in 51 patients receiving oritavancin, resulting in an estimated cost avoidance of $217,206 compared with conventional treatment with vancomycin. CONCLUSION: Utilizing oritavancin to expedite discharge in hospitalized patients appears to be an effective and financially beneficial treatment for ABSSSI. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62535892018-11-28 288. Expediting Discharge in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Clinical and Economic Comparison Between Vancomycin and Oritavancin Whittaker, Cristen Nhan, Ethan Ganapathiraju, Pavan Garrett, Sandra Reilly, Joseph Trivedi, Manish Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) have a high economic burden secondary to prolonged hospitalizations and high rates of recurrent infections. Utilizing oritavancin rather than vancomycin, select inpatients may be discharged earlier in their hospitalization with anticipated decreased infection recurrences and cost avoidance. METHODS: All inpatients administered oritavancin to expedite discharge and/or vancomycin for the treatment of ABSSSI between May 2017 and January 2018 were included in this retrospective evaluation. The primary endpoint was to determine the 30-day ABSSSI recurrence rate between treatment arms. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate financial expenditures associated with utilization of oritavancin when compared with vancomycin, and to assess for potential risk factors associated with poor outcomes. A financial analysis was performed for patients based on their DRG (diagnosis-related group) applying hospital-specific expenditures provided by the finance department. Data were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test, χ(2) test, or t-test as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients receiving oritavancin and 50 patients receiving vancomycin were identified as meeting inclusion criteria. Nine of 50 patients (18%) returned for recurrent infections in the vancomycin arm while only 2 of 51 (4%) returned in the oritavancin arm (P = 0.0279). Out of the 11 patients with recurrent infections, 6 were current intravenous drug users (55%), 3 left against medical advice at their initial visit (27%) and 7 had an emergency department visit in the prior 30 days for the same infection (64%). Overall, there were 111.7 hospitalization days avoided in 51 patients receiving oritavancin, resulting in an estimated cost avoidance of $217,206 compared with conventional treatment with vancomycin. CONCLUSION: Utilizing oritavancin to expedite discharge in hospitalized patients appears to be an effective and financially beneficial treatment for ABSSSI. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253589/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.299 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Whittaker, Cristen
Nhan, Ethan
Ganapathiraju, Pavan
Garrett, Sandra
Reilly, Joseph
Trivedi, Manish
288. Expediting Discharge in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Clinical and Economic Comparison Between Vancomycin and Oritavancin
title 288. Expediting Discharge in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Clinical and Economic Comparison Between Vancomycin and Oritavancin
title_full 288. Expediting Discharge in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Clinical and Economic Comparison Between Vancomycin and Oritavancin
title_fullStr 288. Expediting Discharge in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Clinical and Economic Comparison Between Vancomycin and Oritavancin
title_full_unstemmed 288. Expediting Discharge in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Clinical and Economic Comparison Between Vancomycin and Oritavancin
title_short 288. Expediting Discharge in Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Clinical and Economic Comparison Between Vancomycin and Oritavancin
title_sort 288. expediting discharge in acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a clinical and economic comparison between vancomycin and oritavancin
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253589/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.299
work_keys_str_mv AT whittakercristen 288expeditingdischargeinacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsaclinicalandeconomiccomparisonbetweenvancomycinandoritavancin
AT nhanethan 288expeditingdischargeinacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsaclinicalandeconomiccomparisonbetweenvancomycinandoritavancin
AT ganapathirajupavan 288expeditingdischargeinacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsaclinicalandeconomiccomparisonbetweenvancomycinandoritavancin
AT garrettsandra 288expeditingdischargeinacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsaclinicalandeconomiccomparisonbetweenvancomycinandoritavancin
AT reillyjoseph 288expeditingdischargeinacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsaclinicalandeconomiccomparisonbetweenvancomycinandoritavancin
AT trivedimanish 288expeditingdischargeinacutebacterialskinandskinstructureinfectionsaclinicalandeconomiccomparisonbetweenvancomycinandoritavancin