Cargando…

2425. Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes Among Patients With Monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen observed in nosocomial infections. Due to biofilm production and intrinsic resistance to numerous antimicrobials, organism eradication is difficult and morbidity and mortality remain high. Unfortunately, study outcomes are often c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klinker, Kenneth, Nys, Cara, Venugopalan, Veena, Cherabuddi, Kartikeya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253602/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2078
_version_ 1783373533872652288
author Klinker, Kenneth
Nys, Cara
Venugopalan, Veena
Cherabuddi, Kartikeya
author_facet Klinker, Kenneth
Nys, Cara
Venugopalan, Veena
Cherabuddi, Kartikeya
author_sort Klinker, Kenneth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen observed in nosocomial infections. Due to biofilm production and intrinsic resistance to numerous antimicrobials, organism eradication is difficult and morbidity and mortality remain high. Unfortunately, study outcomes are often confounded by co-infecting organisms. Therefore, clinical and microbiologic outcome data for monomicrobial infections is warranted. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective chart review of adult patients receiving treatment for S. maltophilia between January 2012 and October 2016. Polymicrobial infections and cystic fibrosis patients were excluded. Primary endpoint was clinical cure (CC) at end of therapy. Secondary endpoints included microbiological eradication (ME), 28-day mortality, and resistance selection. An exploratory analysis was performed in patients receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) or levofloxacin (LVX). RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included in the analysis. The population was 60 years of age, predominantly female (62%) with median APACHE score of 16. Infection onset occurred 6 days after admission with 71% located in the ICU. Approximately 2/third of ICU patients were intubated. Primary site of infection was the lung (92%). Treatment strategies included TMP/SMX (45 patients) or LVX (31 patients). Overall, CC, ME, and 28-day mortality was observed in 79%, 82%, and 14%, respectively. Adverse events were uncommon with three patients receiving TMP/SMX requiring alternate therapy. Comparative analysis revealed similar baseline characteristics except higher APACHE scores (18 vs. 14; P = 0.03) and frequency of mechanical ventilation in the TMP/SMX group (64% vs. 30%; P = 0.007). CC was similar between TMP/SMX and LVX (82% vs. 74%, respectively (P = 0.4)). ME was observed in 84% and 77%, respectively (P = 0.5). Resistance selection to primary treatment was observed in 29% (2/7) and 86% (6/7), respectively (P = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Use of TMP/SMX or LVX for S. maltophilia infections resulted in high CC rates. No differences in primary or secondary outcomes were observed; however, a trend toward resistance selection with LVX was identified. Larger studies assessing outcomes and resistance selection are warranted to further delineate treatment. DISCLOSURES: K. Klinker, Melinta Therapeutics: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. Nabriva Therapeutics: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62536022018-11-28 2425. Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes Among Patients With Monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections Klinker, Kenneth Nys, Cara Venugopalan, Veena Cherabuddi, Kartikeya Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen observed in nosocomial infections. Due to biofilm production and intrinsic resistance to numerous antimicrobials, organism eradication is difficult and morbidity and mortality remain high. Unfortunately, study outcomes are often confounded by co-infecting organisms. Therefore, clinical and microbiologic outcome data for monomicrobial infections is warranted. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective chart review of adult patients receiving treatment for S. maltophilia between January 2012 and October 2016. Polymicrobial infections and cystic fibrosis patients were excluded. Primary endpoint was clinical cure (CC) at end of therapy. Secondary endpoints included microbiological eradication (ME), 28-day mortality, and resistance selection. An exploratory analysis was performed in patients receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) or levofloxacin (LVX). RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included in the analysis. The population was 60 years of age, predominantly female (62%) with median APACHE score of 16. Infection onset occurred 6 days after admission with 71% located in the ICU. Approximately 2/third of ICU patients were intubated. Primary site of infection was the lung (92%). Treatment strategies included TMP/SMX (45 patients) or LVX (31 patients). Overall, CC, ME, and 28-day mortality was observed in 79%, 82%, and 14%, respectively. Adverse events were uncommon with three patients receiving TMP/SMX requiring alternate therapy. Comparative analysis revealed similar baseline characteristics except higher APACHE scores (18 vs. 14; P = 0.03) and frequency of mechanical ventilation in the TMP/SMX group (64% vs. 30%; P = 0.007). CC was similar between TMP/SMX and LVX (82% vs. 74%, respectively (P = 0.4)). ME was observed in 84% and 77%, respectively (P = 0.5). Resistance selection to primary treatment was observed in 29% (2/7) and 86% (6/7), respectively (P = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Use of TMP/SMX or LVX for S. maltophilia infections resulted in high CC rates. No differences in primary or secondary outcomes were observed; however, a trend toward resistance selection with LVX was identified. Larger studies assessing outcomes and resistance selection are warranted to further delineate treatment. DISCLOSURES: K. Klinker, Melinta Therapeutics: Consultant, Speaker honorarium. Nabriva Therapeutics: Scientific Advisor, Consulting fee. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253602/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2078 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Klinker, Kenneth
Nys, Cara
Venugopalan, Veena
Cherabuddi, Kartikeya
2425. Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes Among Patients With Monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections
title 2425. Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes Among Patients With Monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections
title_full 2425. Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes Among Patients With Monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections
title_fullStr 2425. Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes Among Patients With Monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections
title_full_unstemmed 2425. Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes Among Patients With Monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections
title_short 2425. Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes Among Patients With Monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections
title_sort 2425. clinical and microbiologic outcomes among patients with monomicrobial stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253602/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.2078
work_keys_str_mv AT klinkerkenneth 2425clinicalandmicrobiologicoutcomesamongpatientswithmonomicrobialstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfections
AT nyscara 2425clinicalandmicrobiologicoutcomesamongpatientswithmonomicrobialstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfections
AT venugopalanveena 2425clinicalandmicrobiologicoutcomesamongpatientswithmonomicrobialstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfections
AT cherabuddikartikeya 2425clinicalandmicrobiologicoutcomesamongpatientswithmonomicrobialstenotrophomonasmaltophiliainfections