Cargando…

1799. Impact of Real-Time Electronic Notifications to Pharmacists of Rapid Diagnostic Blood Culture Results

BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic tests that utilize multiplex PCR technology provide faster time to pathogen identification, but maximizing the impact on outcomes is dependent upon who is available to respond to test results. In June 2017, pharmacists began receiving in-basket notifications of positive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caulder, Liz, Beardsley, James, Palavecino, Elizabeth, Dyke, Erica Van, Johnson, James, Ohl, Christopher, Luther, Vera, Williamson, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253631/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1455
_version_ 1783373540902305792
author Caulder, Liz
Beardsley, James
Palavecino, Elizabeth
Dyke, Erica Van
Johnson, James
Ohl, Christopher
Luther, Vera
Williamson, John
author_facet Caulder, Liz
Beardsley, James
Palavecino, Elizabeth
Dyke, Erica Van
Johnson, James
Ohl, Christopher
Luther, Vera
Williamson, John
author_sort Caulder, Liz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic tests that utilize multiplex PCR technology provide faster time to pathogen identification, but maximizing the impact on outcomes is dependent upon who is available to respond to test results. In June 2017, pharmacists began receiving in-basket notifications of positive results from the institution’s FilmArray BCID assay. The objective of this study was to determine the impact on antibiotic utilization associated with this method of communicating results. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, before-and-after study at an academic medical center with an established stewardship program. Inclusion criteria: Adult patients age ≥18 admitted to an ICU or oncology unit with ≥1 positive blood culture containing a gram-positive organism identified by FilmArray BCID. Patients with polymicrobial infection, concomitant infection caused by a different organism, antibiotics started before admission, or death prior to organism identification were excluded. Data were collected during a 4-month period before (PRE) and a 4-month period after (POST) implementation of in-basket notifications. Stewardship metrics and other outcome measures were compared between the two groups. Pharmacists received no targeted stewardship training on how to respond to results. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients met study criteria (49 PRE and 43 POST). Patients were age 62 ± 16, male (55%), and 77 (84%) were located in an ICU. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 4 and Pitt Bacteremia Score was 1. Sixty-seven patients were considered to have noncontaminant bloodstream infection. Median results for these patients are listed in the table. Patients with contaminants (n = 25) had 3.5 and 7 antibiotic-free days in the PRE and POST groups, respectively (P = 0.34). CONCLUSION: In-basket notifications did not significantly improve antibiotic utilization or clinical outcomes. Active interventions and antimicrobial stewardship initiatives are needed in combination with rapid diagnostic tests. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62536312018-11-28 1799. Impact of Real-Time Electronic Notifications to Pharmacists of Rapid Diagnostic Blood Culture Results Caulder, Liz Beardsley, James Palavecino, Elizabeth Dyke, Erica Van Johnson, James Ohl, Christopher Luther, Vera Williamson, John Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic tests that utilize multiplex PCR technology provide faster time to pathogen identification, but maximizing the impact on outcomes is dependent upon who is available to respond to test results. In June 2017, pharmacists began receiving in-basket notifications of positive results from the institution’s FilmArray BCID assay. The objective of this study was to determine the impact on antibiotic utilization associated with this method of communicating results. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, before-and-after study at an academic medical center with an established stewardship program. Inclusion criteria: Adult patients age ≥18 admitted to an ICU or oncology unit with ≥1 positive blood culture containing a gram-positive organism identified by FilmArray BCID. Patients with polymicrobial infection, concomitant infection caused by a different organism, antibiotics started before admission, or death prior to organism identification were excluded. Data were collected during a 4-month period before (PRE) and a 4-month period after (POST) implementation of in-basket notifications. Stewardship metrics and other outcome measures were compared between the two groups. Pharmacists received no targeted stewardship training on how to respond to results. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients met study criteria (49 PRE and 43 POST). Patients were age 62 ± 16, male (55%), and 77 (84%) were located in an ICU. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 4 and Pitt Bacteremia Score was 1. Sixty-seven patients were considered to have noncontaminant bloodstream infection. Median results for these patients are listed in the table. Patients with contaminants (n = 25) had 3.5 and 7 antibiotic-free days in the PRE and POST groups, respectively (P = 0.34). CONCLUSION: In-basket notifications did not significantly improve antibiotic utilization or clinical outcomes. Active interventions and antimicrobial stewardship initiatives are needed in combination with rapid diagnostic tests. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253631/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1455 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Caulder, Liz
Beardsley, James
Palavecino, Elizabeth
Dyke, Erica Van
Johnson, James
Ohl, Christopher
Luther, Vera
Williamson, John
1799. Impact of Real-Time Electronic Notifications to Pharmacists of Rapid Diagnostic Blood Culture Results
title 1799. Impact of Real-Time Electronic Notifications to Pharmacists of Rapid Diagnostic Blood Culture Results
title_full 1799. Impact of Real-Time Electronic Notifications to Pharmacists of Rapid Diagnostic Blood Culture Results
title_fullStr 1799. Impact of Real-Time Electronic Notifications to Pharmacists of Rapid Diagnostic Blood Culture Results
title_full_unstemmed 1799. Impact of Real-Time Electronic Notifications to Pharmacists of Rapid Diagnostic Blood Culture Results
title_short 1799. Impact of Real-Time Electronic Notifications to Pharmacists of Rapid Diagnostic Blood Culture Results
title_sort 1799. impact of real-time electronic notifications to pharmacists of rapid diagnostic blood culture results
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253631/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1455
work_keys_str_mv AT caulderliz 1799impactofrealtimeelectronicnotificationstopharmacistsofrapiddiagnosticbloodcultureresults
AT beardsleyjames 1799impactofrealtimeelectronicnotificationstopharmacistsofrapiddiagnosticbloodcultureresults
AT palavecinoelizabeth 1799impactofrealtimeelectronicnotificationstopharmacistsofrapiddiagnosticbloodcultureresults
AT dykeericavan 1799impactofrealtimeelectronicnotificationstopharmacistsofrapiddiagnosticbloodcultureresults
AT johnsonjames 1799impactofrealtimeelectronicnotificationstopharmacistsofrapiddiagnosticbloodcultureresults
AT ohlchristopher 1799impactofrealtimeelectronicnotificationstopharmacistsofrapiddiagnosticbloodcultureresults
AT luthervera 1799impactofrealtimeelectronicnotificationstopharmacistsofrapiddiagnosticbloodcultureresults
AT williamsonjohn 1799impactofrealtimeelectronicnotificationstopharmacistsofrapiddiagnosticbloodcultureresults