Cargando…

1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts

BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin (FOS) and NTF (NTF) are IDSA guideline approved drugs for acute cystitis in women. However, their activity against multi drug-resistant Gram-negatives may be driving increased use among inpatients with more complicated UTI. We evaluated trends in inpatient prescribing of these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Kalpana, Goetz, Matthew B, Jones, Makoto, Strymish, Judith M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253901/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1353
_version_ 1783373600579911680
author Gupta, Kalpana
Goetz, Matthew B
Jones, Makoto
Strymish, Judith M
author_facet Gupta, Kalpana
Goetz, Matthew B
Jones, Makoto
Strymish, Judith M
author_sort Gupta, Kalpana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin (FOS) and NTF (NTF) are IDSA guideline approved drugs for acute cystitis in women. However, their activity against multi drug-resistant Gram-negatives may be driving increased use among inpatients with more complicated UTI. We evaluated trends in inpatient prescribing of these UTI-specific agents in the predominantly male population of the national VA system over a 7-year period. METHODS: All inpatient bar coded administrations for FOS and NTF at every VA facility nationwide from 2011 to 2017 were captured through a data analytics platform which extracts data from the VA Data warehouse. Antibiotic days of therapy and rates per 1,000 patient-days (DOT/1,000CD) were extracted by year and compared using Mantel-Haenszel chi square for linear trend (MH OR). Demographics were captured via administrative data. RESULTS: Prescriptions from over 65 million patient-days spanning 7 years and all inpatient units in 129 VA facilities were included. Approximately 90% of patients were male with a mean age range of 55–64 years. FOS use increased from 128 prescriptions in 2011 to a high of 1,230 in 2016 and 1,003 in 2017 (figure). At the maximum in 2016, prescription rates increased almost 10-fold compared with 2011 (MH OR 9.8, P < 0.001). NTF prescriptions declined from 26,590 in 2011 to 19,343 in 2017. Rates decreased 25% from 2.8 to 2.1, MH OR 0.75, P < 0.001. In 2017, FOS and NTF usage rates were highest in rehabilitation/spinal cord units (table). CONCLUSION: In this large nationwide cohort, FOS use increased almost 10-fold among predominantly male inpatients while NTF use declined slightly. NTF is still used orders of magnitude more than FOS, even after adjusting for extended days of activity of FOS. Both agents retain activity against many MDR GNRs but differences in efficacy, tissue penetration, familiarity and availability likely influence the choice for oral UTI-specific treatment. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6253901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62539012018-11-28 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts Gupta, Kalpana Goetz, Matthew B Jones, Makoto Strymish, Judith M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin (FOS) and NTF (NTF) are IDSA guideline approved drugs for acute cystitis in women. However, their activity against multi drug-resistant Gram-negatives may be driving increased use among inpatients with more complicated UTI. We evaluated trends in inpatient prescribing of these UTI-specific agents in the predominantly male population of the national VA system over a 7-year period. METHODS: All inpatient bar coded administrations for FOS and NTF at every VA facility nationwide from 2011 to 2017 were captured through a data analytics platform which extracts data from the VA Data warehouse. Antibiotic days of therapy and rates per 1,000 patient-days (DOT/1,000CD) were extracted by year and compared using Mantel-Haenszel chi square for linear trend (MH OR). Demographics were captured via administrative data. RESULTS: Prescriptions from over 65 million patient-days spanning 7 years and all inpatient units in 129 VA facilities were included. Approximately 90% of patients were male with a mean age range of 55–64 years. FOS use increased from 128 prescriptions in 2011 to a high of 1,230 in 2016 and 1,003 in 2017 (figure). At the maximum in 2016, prescription rates increased almost 10-fold compared with 2011 (MH OR 9.8, P < 0.001). NTF prescriptions declined from 26,590 in 2011 to 19,343 in 2017. Rates decreased 25% from 2.8 to 2.1, MH OR 0.75, P < 0.001. In 2017, FOS and NTF usage rates were highest in rehabilitation/spinal cord units (table). CONCLUSION: In this large nationwide cohort, FOS use increased almost 10-fold among predominantly male inpatients while NTF use declined slightly. NTF is still used orders of magnitude more than FOS, even after adjusting for extended days of activity of FOS. Both agents retain activity against many MDR GNRs but differences in efficacy, tissue penetration, familiarity and availability likely influence the choice for oral UTI-specific treatment. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253901/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1353 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Gupta, Kalpana
Goetz, Matthew B
Jones, Makoto
Strymish, Judith M
1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts
title 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts
title_full 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts
title_fullStr 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts
title_full_unstemmed 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts
title_short 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts
title_sort 1524. are providers shifting from ntf to fosfomycin for inpatient uti? big data reveals small shifts
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253901/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1353
work_keys_str_mv AT guptakalpana 1524areprovidersshiftingfromntftofosfomycinforinpatientutibigdatarevealssmallshifts
AT goetzmatthewb 1524areprovidersshiftingfromntftofosfomycinforinpatientutibigdatarevealssmallshifts
AT jonesmakoto 1524areprovidersshiftingfromntftofosfomycinforinpatientutibigdatarevealssmallshifts
AT strymishjudithm 1524areprovidersshiftingfromntftofosfomycinforinpatientutibigdatarevealssmallshifts