Cargando…
1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts
BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin (FOS) and NTF (NTF) are IDSA guideline approved drugs for acute cystitis in women. However, their activity against multi drug-resistant Gram-negatives may be driving increased use among inpatients with more complicated UTI. We evaluated trends in inpatient prescribing of these...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253901/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1353 |
_version_ | 1783373600579911680 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Kalpana Goetz, Matthew B Jones, Makoto Strymish, Judith M |
author_facet | Gupta, Kalpana Goetz, Matthew B Jones, Makoto Strymish, Judith M |
author_sort | Gupta, Kalpana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin (FOS) and NTF (NTF) are IDSA guideline approved drugs for acute cystitis in women. However, their activity against multi drug-resistant Gram-negatives may be driving increased use among inpatients with more complicated UTI. We evaluated trends in inpatient prescribing of these UTI-specific agents in the predominantly male population of the national VA system over a 7-year period. METHODS: All inpatient bar coded administrations for FOS and NTF at every VA facility nationwide from 2011 to 2017 were captured through a data analytics platform which extracts data from the VA Data warehouse. Antibiotic days of therapy and rates per 1,000 patient-days (DOT/1,000CD) were extracted by year and compared using Mantel-Haenszel chi square for linear trend (MH OR). Demographics were captured via administrative data. RESULTS: Prescriptions from over 65 million patient-days spanning 7 years and all inpatient units in 129 VA facilities were included. Approximately 90% of patients were male with a mean age range of 55–64 years. FOS use increased from 128 prescriptions in 2011 to a high of 1,230 in 2016 and 1,003 in 2017 (figure). At the maximum in 2016, prescription rates increased almost 10-fold compared with 2011 (MH OR 9.8, P < 0.001). NTF prescriptions declined from 26,590 in 2011 to 19,343 in 2017. Rates decreased 25% from 2.8 to 2.1, MH OR 0.75, P < 0.001. In 2017, FOS and NTF usage rates were highest in rehabilitation/spinal cord units (table). CONCLUSION: In this large nationwide cohort, FOS use increased almost 10-fold among predominantly male inpatients while NTF use declined slightly. NTF is still used orders of magnitude more than FOS, even after adjusting for extended days of activity of FOS. Both agents retain activity against many MDR GNRs but differences in efficacy, tissue penetration, familiarity and availability likely influence the choice for oral UTI-specific treatment. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6253901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62539012018-11-28 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts Gupta, Kalpana Goetz, Matthew B Jones, Makoto Strymish, Judith M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Fosfomycin (FOS) and NTF (NTF) are IDSA guideline approved drugs for acute cystitis in women. However, their activity against multi drug-resistant Gram-negatives may be driving increased use among inpatients with more complicated UTI. We evaluated trends in inpatient prescribing of these UTI-specific agents in the predominantly male population of the national VA system over a 7-year period. METHODS: All inpatient bar coded administrations for FOS and NTF at every VA facility nationwide from 2011 to 2017 were captured through a data analytics platform which extracts data from the VA Data warehouse. Antibiotic days of therapy and rates per 1,000 patient-days (DOT/1,000CD) were extracted by year and compared using Mantel-Haenszel chi square for linear trend (MH OR). Demographics were captured via administrative data. RESULTS: Prescriptions from over 65 million patient-days spanning 7 years and all inpatient units in 129 VA facilities were included. Approximately 90% of patients were male with a mean age range of 55–64 years. FOS use increased from 128 prescriptions in 2011 to a high of 1,230 in 2016 and 1,003 in 2017 (figure). At the maximum in 2016, prescription rates increased almost 10-fold compared with 2011 (MH OR 9.8, P < 0.001). NTF prescriptions declined from 26,590 in 2011 to 19,343 in 2017. Rates decreased 25% from 2.8 to 2.1, MH OR 0.75, P < 0.001. In 2017, FOS and NTF usage rates were highest in rehabilitation/spinal cord units (table). CONCLUSION: In this large nationwide cohort, FOS use increased almost 10-fold among predominantly male inpatients while NTF use declined slightly. NTF is still used orders of magnitude more than FOS, even after adjusting for extended days of activity of FOS. Both agents retain activity against many MDR GNRs but differences in efficacy, tissue penetration, familiarity and availability likely influence the choice for oral UTI-specific treatment. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6253901/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1353 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Gupta, Kalpana Goetz, Matthew B Jones, Makoto Strymish, Judith M 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts |
title | 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts |
title_full | 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts |
title_fullStr | 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts |
title_full_unstemmed | 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts |
title_short | 1524. Are Providers Shifting from NTF to Fosfomycin for Inpatient UTI? Big Data Reveals Small Shifts |
title_sort | 1524. are providers shifting from ntf to fosfomycin for inpatient uti? big data reveals small shifts |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6253901/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptakalpana 1524areprovidersshiftingfromntftofosfomycinforinpatientutibigdatarevealssmallshifts AT goetzmatthewb 1524areprovidersshiftingfromntftofosfomycinforinpatientutibigdatarevealssmallshifts AT jonesmakoto 1524areprovidersshiftingfromntftofosfomycinforinpatientutibigdatarevealssmallshifts AT strymishjudithm 1524areprovidersshiftingfromntftofosfomycinforinpatientutibigdatarevealssmallshifts |